Recent comments in /f/headphones

ChipsAhoiMcCoy t1_j20z2sd wrote

Just my two cents, I don’t think you want to be sweating on ear pads. You’ll have to replace them very often, and could possibly cause actual damage to the drivers if I had to guess.

Best practice to just use earbuds with water resistance instead.

2

mcjasonb t1_j20wapo wrote

Flattest is probably somewhere close to the Etymotic ER4SR. Most people will say that they have no bass though. They measure flat in the bass with a rise where the lack of ear gain would be.

3

SupOrSalad t1_j20vrj9 wrote

Sorry for just dropping the video earlier and dipping, I was at work but really wanted to chip in on this topic.

Ok so first, it's good to have an idea how we hear and what the driver is doing in regard to pressure waves when generating sound. https://imgur.com/a/AYU9ciU So in this image it depicts individual frequency waves and then they are combined in an analog signal for the driver to create them, they are all added (and subtracted) together into a single waveform that the driver follows. That creates the pressure waves that our ears pick up and extract information from. Now when applying that to frequency response, the varying SPL of differing frequencies has a direct affect on the shape of the waveform due to differing amplitude in various frequencies.

With that in mind it's also good to know about things like auditory masking. When multiple close together frequencies are played, if one is substantially louder than other similar frequencies being played, our brain filters the quieter ones out. The range of frequencies masked is dependent on how loud the peak is. So with headphones that have substantial variation in it's FR, it may sound either more "detailed" or less "detailed" than another based on it's FR. Personally I believe this is also one of the factors that causes the perception of "fast or slow" headphones, despite their drivers not actually responding in a "fast or slow manner" (in the sense its often described).

That said, it's not discounting headphones, different drivers, and the research or quality put into them. Different headphones and drivers may have their own unique frequency response due to various factors, and EQing is more like bending that overall tonality, but specifical characteristics of the FR that may make them sound unique will still be present.

So no you can't just look at a graph and know exactly how it will sound, or use a FR graph to EQ it perfectly to you because of differences in transfer function and acoustic impedance. Even if they measure the same on a graph, it may differ at your eardrum.

To summarize, FR at your eardrum in theory contains all the information you need, but actually extracting that information from FR is not reliable and FR made on standardized rigs is better used as a tool, but still trust your ears first

8

Umlautica t1_j20uqas wrote

This post has been removed. Please note the following rule:

>Rule 2: Ask purchase and shopping questions in the Shopping and Setup Help Desk at https://reddit.com/r/headphones/about/sticky > >Requests for product opinions, comparisons, and general purchase advice must be made in the dedicated Shopping and Setup Help Desk instead of a new post.

If the above link leads you to the wrong place: the post can usually be found on the top r/headphones, and titled Shopping and Setup Help Desk.

You may also use r/headphoneadvice but please search their resources before posting.

1

SmartOpinion69 t1_j20uhgu wrote

if a company can make a closed back version of an open back headphone and it sounds about right, then that is a success. ZMF pulled it off with the verite which is great. however, sennheiser failed massively with the HD820

12

DevilsPajamas t1_j20u0ho wrote

Reply to comment by baneand in STAX X9000, the clear winner by MashMayoru

head-fi and specialized reddit groups like this and facebook are different beasts. Facebook you get spieled on cheap chinese crap, here you get spieled on extravagant headphone setups that most people would never be able to afford.

4

DevilsPajamas t1_j20tul7 wrote

Yeah, you just have to realize that after a point, and that point depends entirely on each individual, you get to where you see huge diminishing returned after a certain price point. If you already have a ndh 30, I would imagine you are pretty much there. If you are happy where you are at then stay there. If not you might need to look at where in the line you can improve things, like whatever headphone amp you have. Throwing thousands of dollars on headphones is something I know I can't afford... I wish I could though, lol.

0

TadCat216 t1_j20t4ii wrote

Frequency response graphs show the most important single metric of a piece of audio equipment—the linear distortion. Linear distortion is far more easily audible and objectionable than nonlinear distortions. I don’t think anyone claims that FR is ‘everything’ but it is definitely the most important thing.

1

MachineTeaching t1_j20sg1d wrote

The 900 Pro X are excellent for the money.

But honestly, the biggest caveat is that sound is subjective and ultimately only you will know what you like. It's definitely possible that other headphones in the same price bracket will blow you away way more. I would rather try that, maybe some Sennheiser or Hifiman headphones, than jumping to the 1990 straight away.

Although if you generally like the 900 Pro X, the 1990s are definitely a good choice.

2