Recent comments in /f/headphones

Doc-85 t1_j2em9kr wrote

Reply to Ohm My Lord by ZevireTees

Holy shit, you need a whole electric substation to power these or a small scale nuclear reactor!

0

Doc-85 t1_j2eixvz wrote

Just to show how subjective this hobby is. For many people (me included) the HD600 is like hearing music enveloped in high quality velure and silk while viking ladies feed me grapes, while for some people is like Jack the hobo dressed in trash bags, in a Walmart cart, yelling for crack down the street.

6

Smoker1965 t1_j2eihl7 wrote

Really a loaded question. I have both and I have to say I am not giving up either.

The HD600 is such a good headphone either on tubes or one of the many DACs/AMPs out there.

The 109 is easier to drive and has a fantastic soundstage. I find myself just listening to them like I'm not wearing headphones at all.

If I had to choose, I would take the 109 ONLY because it's easier to drive and I can use it across more devices.

One last thing, remember you are talking about a headphone that is two to about three times the price (depending on the deals). It's a great headphone but the 600s on a good tube amp is magic in my humble opinion.

2

PH-GH95610 t1_j2ef65g wrote

In my experience, it depends on tube. Some of them play perfect after 15-20 hours burn in but some tubes need much more. And during the listening session after they are burn in, I use to heat them for 15-20 minutes without signal and then another 10-15 minutes with signal and after this time they reach their best sound. I use Voskhod tubes - amazing sound sonically and really big sound stage.

1

ptword t1_j2edpqv wrote

Most full size headphones at these prices don't really sound that good. If you were expecting anything close to truly crystal clear and distortion free sound, no full size headphone, besides maybe a couple of ultra-expensive top-tier models, achieves that goal. Most headphones genuinely sound like crap. The HD600 is one of the least offending affordably priced products, but it's still not gonna be a massive jump from an HD599. The difference in sound quality isn't THAT big.

You'll get far better sound quality with IEMs at those prices.

−4

TransducerBot t1_j2ebe73 wrote

This submission has automatically been removed due to the following rule:

>Rule 2: Ask purchase and shopping questions in the Shopping, Setup, and Technical Help Desk > > Requests for product opinions, comparisons, and general purchase advice must be made in the dedicated Shopping, Setup, and Technical Help Desk instead of a new post.

Portable audio related purchase advice may also be asked in r/HeadphoneAdvice but please familiarize yourself with their rules first.

What questions are considered purchase advice?

  • A request for product suggestions, comparison requests, or opinion requests fall under the purchase advice rule. These can often be found by searching first.

  • Any suggestion or comparison request pertaining to headphones, IEMs, DACs, amps, or other accessories should be directed to the purchase help thread or r/headphoneadvice.

  • Asking the subreddit to help make a decision to buy a product does fall under this rule (e.g. "should I get dekoni pads for my HD650?").

Why does this rule even exist?

I'm certain that my post wasn’t asking for product opinions or purchase advice!

  • Thanks for reading the above and making it this far.

  • I'm a bot and I sometimes make mistakes. If you've read this message and still believe that it doesn't apply, please message the r/headphones moderators

1