Recent comments in /f/headphones

GreatStuffOnly OP t1_j4wg6y6 wrote

Man, as others have said, I have no doubt that their higher end headphones are constructed more solidly. But I just needed the feature for this pair. Wireless, mic, with acceptable audio quality. I don’t want to put BT in there since I already know this is the only pair. Don’t know any other pair that does this for any cost.

1

TheFrator t1_j4wefrn wrote

> It in itself isn't a major problem, its more what it might say about their processes, business model and/or customer care that concerns me.

Yeah and given OP's experience with one of their inexpensive products it seems like Audeze does more harm than good. Like what if OP gets a higher headphone budget and can afford something like an LCD-X and now they will automatically avoid it. Seems like a quick way to save $100 now but lose more in the future.

Anyway, my experience with Audeze CS has been solid but I'm a degenerate with an astronomically expensive headphone so their more inclined to help me.

3

f3llyn t1_j4wdtxi wrote

I don't know how they managed to do it, it's pretty much magic.

Unfortunately my experience with IEMs is limited to the two that I have and both are outside your budget so I can't give you any good suggestions.

But if you follow this sub you'll see there is a new IEM coming out basically every other week that is somehow the most budget friendly and also best IEM. So I think you have a lot of options to choose from, probably even more than headphones.

1

TheOddestOfSocks t1_j4wd5on wrote

Yea good point. If it's a deliberate design decision then I certainly don't have enough knowledge to debate that. As you said, I'm just basing my assumption on the competition successfully producing high end headphone with easily replaceable pads. It in itself isn't a major problem, its more what it might say about their processes, business model and/or customer care that concerns me.

4

Pangolin_Unlucky t1_j4waduy wrote

2 or 3 units that people posted about. I actually find it way more unacceptable than the post. The fact that it was even a possibility for an eye-watering $4,500 headphone is unacceptable. One of the reason why I’m such a fan of meze is that they treat the build quality of their product above what is expected for their price point. Yeah sound is number one, but it shouldn’t be excuse for cutting corner for build quality, which is also why I will never buy Hifiman again.

3

TheFrator t1_j4w9tx7 wrote

> That's seriously shows a lack of forethought... Or a distinct anti consumer design.

The pads are still replaceable albeit more of a pain to replace. They even wrote an article explaining why they glue on pads (article) but that doesn't explain why other companies can accomplish non-glued on pads while they can't / won't. Anyway I view it like some speaker manufactures really going on and on about how inert their speaker cabinets are.

3