Recent comments in /f/headphones
blorg t1_iycm1c8 wrote
Reply to Hifiman Edition XS disappointment by Leather_Vegetable10
You can install Equalizer APO and use it with any soundcard including the Sound BlasterX G6. Besides that though if you are coming from the Fidelio you probably want to start with a bass boost, the X2HR are quite bassy for an open back.
Tanachip t1_iycly8u wrote
Reply to comment by Lapralapso in Going from the Sennheiser HD 560S to the HD 800S by Lapralapso
Please don’t go into debt for headphones.
blorg t1_iyclvld wrote
/r/headphones soundstage testing playlist: https://open.spotify.com/playlist/3nRSh6qyYtTeHfhGM5Q5Iq
GZoST t1_iyclvdd wrote
Reply to Is this min-maxing obsession or are there benefits to be had by tweaking things on the OS or digital side and using 'audiophile' footers? by Orangutan_Ulti
Bullshit on top of nonsense with a healthy dose of idiocy.
Sources, DACs and amps are solved problems as long as you buy stuff made by engineers who use measurements for validating their designs and not by audiophiles with golden ears.
Headphones and speakers are more problematic, especially since there are the headphone + head or speakers + room interaction. Optimizing this interaction makes sense. However, that's not with audiophile tweaks but EQ and, for speakers, room treatment (e.g. absorbers).
therealPaulPlay t1_iyclns6 wrote
Reply to comment by reasec in Headphones for a 5y old by reasec
I think thats a great choice :) I hope you‘ll enjoy them
[deleted] t1_iyckqko wrote
[deleted]
GZoST t1_iyck46s wrote
What do you consider "serious saving"? If this means eating ramen for months, or otherwise limiting even remotely important things then don't do it. You are enjoying your music and the heavens won't open when using the HD800(s) (I use a HD800, triangulating in regard to the HD560s based on my experience with other headphones that others rate about the same).
Having said that, if you can afford to save without it messing with your life, the HD800 (+ EQ) may well be worth it. There is lots of music where I'm absolutely fine with my work headphones (SHP 9600, because comfort), my out-and-about Galaxy Buds or the trying-out-the-current-low-end Moondrop Chu or Salnotes Zero. But for classical, especially symphonic, music I pretty much always use the best headphones/IEMs available to me and usable in the situation (so most of the time the HD800) because it helps my enjoyment. The technical improvements such as better instrument separation and placement make it easier to understand what is happening and to just get lost in the music.
atwl77 t1_iycjwiu wrote
Reply to what features could future amps/dacs have that can make them better than what's available today? by 2ndRoundExit
For dac/amps with preamp outputs, a separate volume knob for main out and headphone out would be nice... like how most audio interfaces do.
facts_guy2020 t1_iycjpja wrote
Arya are your best bet, I felt edition xs was lacking.
Nothing comes close to the experience of arya, its like sitting in a well treated room.
Like every sound, instrument has its own space and nothing ever fights to be in front, if they seem bright then you need more power.
denoxster t1_iycjcx7 wrote
I would say go for it and buy used, in case you change your mind, you don't lose too much.
reasec OP t1_iycizr6 wrote
Reply to comment by therealPaulPlay in Headphones for a 5y old by reasec
I settled on Final UX3000, they look great spec wise and even design is good. Thank you very much!
aandres_gm t1_iyciw7v wrote
Reply to comment by Orangutan_Ulti in Is this min-maxing obsession or are there benefits to be had by tweaking things on the OS or digital side and using 'audiophile' footers? by Orangutan_Ulti
The PC gets thirsty at times, bro. Gotta let it sip on the lemonade.
reasec OP t1_iycivlq wrote
Reply to Headphones for a 5y old by reasec
Thank you all for your suggestions, i will pick final ux3000.
Raytheon-6 OP t1_iyciv2q wrote
Reply to comment by ogiovannesouza in I'm not an audiophile, but these are the best bluetooth headphones I've ever tried by Raytheon-6
100% worth it.
atwl77 t1_iycis0p wrote
They should be tight enough to not freely rotate on their own, and require some deliberate effort to rotate. If you aren't constantly rotating them every now and then, you should be fine.
Doccks71 t1_iycibsz wrote
Buy a used HD 800 for 600-700 US
UnnecessaryMovements t1_iyci1wf wrote
Reply to Is this min-maxing obsession or are there benefits to be had by tweaking things on the OS or digital side and using 'audiophile' footers? by Orangutan_Ulti
That's the reason I never came back to Head Fi. Those pseudoscience and the Tyll and NwAvGuy drama.
Arisa_kokkoro t1_iycfzzb wrote
holy shit
ExtendedOrb420 t1_iycfqjz wrote
Reply to comment by G1cin in My opinion on the DT 770 Pros from somebody who has only used gaming headphones. by G1cin
I tried auto-eq and ngl I think it sucks, but that obviously just means I didn't like whatever target they were going for. I recommend trying the oratory1990 eq, that way you can even play with the bass if you don't find it enough using equaliser apo and peace.
Yelov t1_iycfq6j wrote
>to the point where you could never go back to the 560S' under any circumstance once you have listened to the 800S' for a while
I don't think you'd prefer the HD800S for literally everything. For example, HD800(S) is fantastic for orchestral music etc, but it's not that well suited for metal, rap etc. You could however EQ them and probably get a sound where you enjoy them for more genres.
At the same time, HD800 is the most comfortable pair of headphones I've tried and it's the only one that has made me go "wow, this is a different class of audio quality". Specifically the perceived detail and soundstage is amazing. The tonality is hit or miss though, that's why I mentioned EQ. Trying them out yourself is the best thing you could do.
hurtyewh t1_iycfo5s wrote
Reply to Just EQ in resolution. by TheFrator
I know there are grainy garbage headphones like the MDR-7506, but when a decent one or an IEM is well EQ'd it can be a ridiculous improvement. Like say EarFun Free Pro 2 with Oluv's firmware EQ vs a Dusk doesn't show me anything more really. That said an LCD-5 impresses the hell out of me compared to the LCD-X's etc that I'm more used to. I don't think it's just about tuning, but when distortion etc are below audible levels then EQ can take you 99% there I'd say.
That said your ears are useless for EQ of that caliber so practically doesn't help much past a measured preset.
Gofa_Kirselph t1_iycfe4w wrote
Reply to comment by Orangutan_Ulti in Is this min-maxing obsession or are there benefits to be had by tweaking things on the OS or digital side and using 'audiophile' footers? by Orangutan_Ulti
Man, as if this hobby wasn’t esoteric enough. That’s why people think we’re insane
SirDemonLord t1_iycf2s1 wrote
Not really worth it. They're great headphones, however one Sennheiser is more than enough even for the most demanding listener.
If you're looking for an alternative, check out Beyerdynamic, Audeze, or something else. There's a funny saying going around that "if you've heard one Sennheiser's, you've heard them all" and it doesn't stray that far away from the truth.
I've owned Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro, Sennheiser HD600, Focal Clear Pro, Sennheiser HD800 and Kennerton Vali. I've sold the Beyerdynamic's (they were neat) and returned the Focal's (warranty return due to faulty construction).
From the above, I can tell that the price difference between HD560, HD600, HD650 (the reasonable range) and HD800, HD800S does not justify the purchase. Once again, they're all great headphones on their own.
AGuyWhoLikesSocks t1_iycer57 wrote
Reply to Topping L30 II - Good shtuff by _FinalPantasy_
I have a Topping L30 II coming in the mail because I'm getting real tired of my Herasy's scratchy pot... And with Amazon's extended return policy, I really saw no downside.
Hopefully I'm in the same boat and enjoy it too!
[deleted] t1_iycmd3b wrote
Reply to Finding obscure musicians by UnnecessaryMovements
[removed]