Recent comments in /f/history

Froakiebloke t1_j3wsvo5 wrote

Does anybody have any recommendations for Canadian political history (or Australian, for that matter)? Civilisation VI has introduced me to Wilfrid Laurier and I’d like to know more about the country and that whole era generally, but in the UK Canadian history is totally absent from any mainstream bookshops.

Similarly, does anyone know any good political histories for late c19th European countries, esp. France Germany and Italy? I’m talking about proper high politics, prime ministers and elections etc

4

doylej0011 t1_j3ws50v wrote

Literally did everywhere you listed, tho could go back. No photos online to the immense scale of Petra any justice, I walked around the site for 8+ hours and could have done another whole Day

The most friendly locals of anywhere I've traveled (30+ countries). Great weather, incredible history, good food and super easy to get around. I rented a car and it wasn't to expensive and the roads where better then at home (UK) tho the is a lack of signs for speed bumps, that are just black lumps of tarmac.

Ps. Did see a local on a sport bike on the outskirts of Amman when coming back from Jerash. Tho didn't see any rental motorbikes

21

ElMachoGrande t1_j3vg8ju wrote

I agree. I lived and worked there for a couple of years, and has visited several times since, and will go back again.

Not only is it some amazing geography and history and snorkling, the people are great as well. I've never been to a country (and I've been in 30+ countries) which made me feel so adopted. If I for some reason ever choose to leave Sweden, Jordan will be the place I go to.

My dream is to travel Jordan and revisit all the sites on a motorcycle, and, of course, King's Highway would be a must. I don't know about the legal status of motorcycles there now, though. When I lived there, only government and companies could have motorcycles (an old leftover from the civil war).

Sadly, they miss a lot of tourists. People tend to see the middle east as one place, and don't understand that Jordan is calm, even if there are conflicts in other parts of the middle east. I was in Petra a couple of years after the WTC incident, and there was almost no tourists there. I think I saw less than 10 tourists in an entire day, and before you would see thousands.

I thoroughly recommend visiting. Amman, Petra, Karak, Jerash, King's Highway, Wadi Rum, Dead Sea, Aqaba. You can see all that in 2 weeks, and it is so much worth it.

98

War_Hymn t1_j3v8ldp wrote

>Grenades were never 3-4lbs, what you are talking about is mortar/cannon shells.

I'm pretty sure a mortar or howitzer shell during the Napoleonic Wars weighed much heavier than 3-4 pounds. A shell for a 6 inch howitzer of the French Gribeauval system would had fired a shell that weighed at least 20 pounds. For a large 12 inch siege mortar, it would had been around 150 pounds.

4

Lilslysapper t1_j3us94p wrote

Jordan is such a cool and historic place. I’m glad the military took me there, and I’m hopeful I can go back someday to do more sightseeing. One of the things that stuck out to me was seeing some random Roman-style ruins on the side of the highway. Not a tourist spot, no signs saying what it was, just an ancient settlement lost to time.

254

PBlove t1_j3urqvg wrote

Also they were used.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CxlRJsQ7p2k&t=105s

(Yes the battle from this movie is 17th century, but they were used in similar ways earlier too.)

The big problem is black powder. That shit lights up like no one's business, and so in a musket line... They would be dangerous.

So they were really more of a sometimes weapon, especially when cannons breached a wall grenades would be used to help gain a foot hold in the breach. But the point remains people didn't walk around with them. They were provided when needed for a particular task (until they became reliable, and fit with the infantry doctrines being used ... ... Which took a while

1