Recent comments in /f/history
AlisonChrista t1_j4bzkl7 wrote
Reply to comment by akuthia in Simple/Short/Silly History Questions Saturday! by AutoModerator
This is honestly a very good question. The US has no official religion, and yet it’s more of a theocracy than the UK in practice. I believe it has more to do with actual practice than anything else. A “pure theocracy” basically says that the monarch is divinely selected. In a way, this used to be the thinking in many parts of the UK, although I don’t believe it has ever been known as a theocracy. The UK now has religious freedom, and as far as I know, there are very few religious laws handed down from the monarchy. So you could argue it’s a theocracy by a literal definition, but not in practice. Being head of the Church of England is primarily a handed-down tradition, with very little power over religion overall.
akuthia t1_j4bvmss wrote
Given that the King/Queen of the UK is also the head of the Church of England, why is the UK not considered a theocracy?
Stalins_Moustachio t1_j4boxve wrote
Reply to comment by Shehvar in Simple/Short/Silly History Questions Saturday! by AutoModerator
Based on the qualifiers lf being a land owning, nobility class trained in combat, I would say India had the Rajputs, who can definitely be seen as Indian"knights". Also, although more Nepali than Indian, I would maybe add Gurkhas here too.
Shehvar t1_j4bnkyp wrote
Is there an Indian equivalent of a Japanese Samurai or a European knight?
Suspicious-Post-5866 t1_j4bn8p8 wrote
Why hasn’t AI solved this!??
28nov2022 t1_j4blv5f wrote
Reply to comment by Thibaudborny in Simple/Short/Silly History Questions Saturday! by AutoModerator
Yes my bad thats what i meant. Thank you, i understand it's a bit of a hypothetical question.
InspectorG-007 t1_j4bl7xr wrote
Reply to comment by stegu2 in New archival findings on the earliest ownership of the Voynich Manuscript by stegu2
If none of those, perhaps an Alchemical Manuscript. They used tons of allegory and code.
Thibaudborny t1_j4bk0tp wrote
Reply to comment by getBusyChild in Simple/Short/Silly History Questions Saturday! by AutoModerator
So in 1943, Germany had about 240 uboats, of which 118 were operational at sea, which was apparently their peak number during the war. How do you suggest they monitor the entire northern Atlantic like that, though? They were not reigning supreme in that sense.
Thibaudborny t1_j4bj0in wrote
Reply to comment by 28nov2022 in Simple/Short/Silly History Questions Saturday! by AutoModerator
Japan invaded China years before WW II, in 1937 Your premise in that sense is not correct. If you mean, prior to WW II, would depend on if & how China got out of its civil war & how the USSR/USA took up position.
AChurchForAHelmet t1_j4bgerc wrote
Reply to comment by stegu2 in New archival findings on the earliest ownership of the Voynich Manuscript by stegu2
That's very interesting, I'd basically just dismissed it as a fraud at this point!
I do wonder what the hell it's one about though, you got any good bets?
I always thought it might be some sort of esoteric manual given the waxing and waning fortunes of such material, writing it in code would probably be of use to anyone who knew what it said
stegu2 OP t1_j4bez50 wrote
Reply to comment by waveuponwave in New archival findings on the earliest ownership of the Voynich Manuscript by stegu2
Yes, there are still thousands of letters of physicians and scholars scattered in archives through Europe that have not been indexed. I believe that there might be a letter out there where Carl Widemann or someone else is mentioning the manuscript who certainly already looked interesting to a 16th century scholar. I spend almost two years and tracked down a lot of previous unknown letters but without any direct mention so far.
stegu2 OP t1_j4beh5c wrote
Reply to comment by AChurchForAHelmet in New archival findings on the earliest ownership of the Voynich Manuscript by stegu2
No, really a LOT of statistical analysis on the writing has been done in the last year which rule out that the text was just meaningless gibberish. It has properties of a language, but it could either be an an unknown language, an unknown short hand system, an unknown cipher or a mixture of these (the latter impossible to crack).
stegu2 OP t1_j4be7jn wrote
Reply to comment by Another_mikem in New archival findings on the earliest ownership of the Voynich Manuscript by stegu2
Analysis of the book binding, the illustrations and some color annotations in German narrow down the area to the wider Alpine region. Could be southern Germany, northern Italy, hard to say.
In my opinion the content is much less spectacular than most people think: A recent study shows that is probably dealing with "women medicine", i.e. fertility, abortion, sexuality etc. There a numerous examples that these topics have been censored or encrypted in manuscripts of the time.
28nov2022 t1_j4be6fs wrote
If during WW2 Japan limited their aggression to Manchuria without advancing onto China, could Japan have kept Manchuria?
getBusyChild t1_j4bcprz wrote
WW2 Questions:
Did the Soviets ever bomb, like Britain and the US did, German cities? If so why do we never hear about it.
How did the Germans not discover Churchill was on a destroyer to meet FDR off the coast of Canada in 1941 when U Boats reigned supreme? If not occasionally sitting off the coast of the US, and Canada? Wouldn't a small fleet, not protecting anything, and heading in the wrong direction not raise suspicions?
AChurchForAHelmet t1_j4b4scb wrote
Reply to comment by stegu2 in New archival findings on the earliest ownership of the Voynich Manuscript by stegu2
Congratulations, that's really cool!
I've got to ask since you've studied it more than a little I'm assuming, do you think it's a fraud?
[deleted] t1_j4b0z8v wrote
Reply to comment by GuruBuckaroo in New archival findings on the earliest ownership of the Voynich Manuscript by stegu2
[removed]
waveuponwave t1_j4avpq4 wrote
Really interesting!
So assuming it really belonged to Leonhard Rauwolf... his life seems fairly well researched (just judging from Wikipedia). Do you think there's a chance to trace the ownership of the manuscript even further?
[deleted] t1_j4av5nu wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j4av52y wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j4av4gq wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j4av3zl wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j4av3fy wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j4av211 wrote
Reply to comment by MaleficentDistrict22 in What was the State of Arabic Language Literature in the Ottoman Empire? by McGillis_is_a_Char
Thanks for proving you know nothing of the Caucasus or ancient literature.
CH4LOX2 t1_j4c1eey wrote
Reply to Bookclub and Sources Wednesday! by AutoModerator
I am a History undergrad and originally picked the major because I was passionate about the topic. I quickly got caught up with life though and ended up not learning much during my time in university and ultimately ignored my original passion for the subject. Recently through some podcasts and a growing interest in geopolitics, this passion has been somewhat reignited and I'm looking to bolster a broader knowledge of the subject.
I'm looking for book recommendations that are history essentials. Magnum opuses that everyone interested in history should read, both classics and more recent works. Thanks!