Recent comments in /f/history

CH4LOX2 t1_j4c1eey wrote

I am a History undergrad and originally picked the major because I was passionate about the topic. I quickly got caught up with life though and ended up not learning much during my time in university and ultimately ignored my original passion for the subject. Recently through some podcasts and a growing interest in geopolitics, this passion has been somewhat reignited and I'm looking to bolster a broader knowledge of the subject.

I'm looking for book recommendations that are history essentials. Magnum opuses that everyone interested in history should read, both classics and more recent works. Thanks!

1

AlisonChrista t1_j4bzkl7 wrote

This is honestly a very good question. The US has no official religion, and yet it’s more of a theocracy than the UK in practice. I believe it has more to do with actual practice than anything else. A “pure theocracy” basically says that the monarch is divinely selected. In a way, this used to be the thinking in many parts of the UK, although I don’t believe it has ever been known as a theocracy. The UK now has religious freedom, and as far as I know, there are very few religious laws handed down from the monarchy. So you could argue it’s a theocracy by a literal definition, but not in practice. Being head of the Church of England is primarily a handed-down tradition, with very little power over religion overall.

4

AChurchForAHelmet t1_j4bgerc wrote

That's very interesting, I'd basically just dismissed it as a fraud at this point!

I do wonder what the hell it's one about though, you got any good bets?

I always thought it might be some sort of esoteric manual given the waxing and waning fortunes of such material, writing it in code would probably be of use to anyone who knew what it said

7

stegu2 OP t1_j4bez50 wrote

Yes, there are still thousands of letters of physicians and scholars scattered in archives through Europe that have not been indexed. I believe that there might be a letter out there where Carl Widemann or someone else is mentioning the manuscript who certainly already looked interesting to a 16th century scholar. I spend almost two years and tracked down a lot of previous unknown letters but without any direct mention so far.

14

stegu2 OP t1_j4beh5c wrote

No, really a LOT of statistical analysis on the writing has been done in the last year which rule out that the text was just meaningless gibberish. It has properties of a language, but it could either be an an unknown language, an unknown short hand system, an unknown cipher or a mixture of these (the latter impossible to crack).

20

stegu2 OP t1_j4be7jn wrote

Analysis of the book binding, the illustrations and some color annotations in German narrow down the area to the wider Alpine region. Could be southern Germany, northern Italy, hard to say.

In my opinion the content is much less spectacular than most people think: A recent study shows that is probably dealing with "women medicine", i.e. fertility, abortion, sexuality etc. There a numerous examples that these topics have been censored or encrypted in manuscripts of the time.

26

getBusyChild t1_j4bcprz wrote

WW2 Questions:

Did the Soviets ever bomb, like Britain and the US did, German cities? If so why do we never hear about it.

How did the Germans not discover Churchill was on a destroyer to meet FDR off the coast of Canada in 1941 when U Boats reigned supreme? If not occasionally sitting off the coast of the US, and Canada? Wouldn't a small fleet, not protecting anything, and heading in the wrong direction not raise suspicions?

8