Recent comments in /f/history
RandomChungus69420 t1_j65b0j6 wrote
Reply to Bookclub and Sources Wednesday! by AutoModerator
Guy Sajer’s “Forgotten Soldier” - Truth, Fiction, or a mix of both?
After reading this one for the first time, it left a deep effect on me. It became one of my top 5 war memoirs. I was surprised to learn, after the fact, that the book is surrounded by a lot of controversy about minor details in his recollection or in the presentation of Sajer’s comrade’s names.
It is never fully stated to what degree certain recollections are fact or fiction (e.g., changing of names to protect identities).
It seems as though there are vocal swaths of people who claim it is totally fabricated, while others say it is intentionally a blend of fact and fiction, and still others say it’s simply a result of failed memory recall on the part of the author in some instances mixed with deliberate alteration of names/identities.
I haven’t located much in the way of the author addressing these allegations. Thoughts?
[deleted] t1_j659w3o wrote
Reply to Bookclub and Sources Wednesday! by AutoModerator
[removed]
Remote_Doughnut_5261 t1_j65791j wrote
Reply to Bookclub and Sources Wednesday! by AutoModerator
Hi I am looking for books or pieces about or pertaining to the history of academia and maybe also of the students’ movement.
I read Kant’s “Conflict between the Philosophy and the Theology Faculty,” as well as Blanqui’s “Declaration of the Provisional Committee for Schools.” I found both pieces supremely interesting and I want more.
Laowaii87 t1_j656yl3 wrote
Reply to comment by baumpop in Longest ‘dako’ iron sword at 2.6m, along with a unique shield-shaped mirror, found in 4th-century Japanese burial mound — Finds indicate that the technology of the Kofun period (300-710 AD) was more advanced than previously thought by marketrent
I have to prove you wrong? No bud, that’s not how it works. You claim one thing, and refer to a baseless claim from a video for a source, and then i have to back up not believing you?
Irichcrusader t1_j655slh wrote
Reply to comment by Stalins_Moustachio in Bookclub and Sources Wednesday! by AutoModerator
Sounds really interesting. I haven't touched Napoleonic history in a long time but that's definitely something that would add a lot of detail that isn't normally covered. If you're interested in the Egyptian campaign then I would highly recommend Napoleon in Egypt by Paul Strathem.
Irichcrusader t1_j6554tr wrote
Reply to comment by Kyfighter11 in Bookclub and Sources Wednesday! by AutoModerator
There's a lot of great history YouTube channels out there but, in my experience, the best ones are those who niche down and can really get into the meat of a topic or era. What historical periods are you interested in?
For instance, I really like early modern Europe history (16th to 17th century) and SandRhoman History is really great for that. The Historian's Craft is also great if you love classical (Greek & Roman history).
Rob-Study-8562 OP t1_j6526zb wrote
A new discovery of a statue of Hercules near the Appian Way, apparently dates back to the Roman Imperial period. It’s a significant find.
Canuck_Lives_Matter t1_j6515yo wrote
Reply to comment by Bem-ti-vi in Dozens of pre-Hispanic Zapotec tombs found in San Pedro Nexicho in Mexico by MeatballDom
Mine's more entertaining.
Bem-ti-vi t1_j650wya wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Dozens of pre-Hispanic Zapotec tombs found in San Pedro Nexicho in Mexico by MeatballDom
Hernan Cortes was a conquistador in North America, not South America.
He also took over the Aztec Empire with around 800 Spanish soldiers and tens of thousands of Indigenous allies. Not just 200 people.
baumpop t1_j64sbi6 wrote
Reply to comment by Laowaii87 in Longest ‘dako’ iron sword at 2.6m, along with a unique shield-shaped mirror, found in 4th-century Japanese burial mound — Finds indicate that the technology of the Kofun period (300-710 AD) was more advanced than previously thought by marketrent
So is what you're telling me.
Bust me off your source for 13th century coloquialisms.
plantanus69 t1_j64rjxk wrote
Reply to comment by Uschnej in Russian political parties after Feb 1917? by drain_clerk
I should clarify my use of the word “orthodox”. Im not referring to a single set of beliefs that are “Marxist orthodoxy”, that doesn’t really exist; there are several different orthodoxies within Marxism (consider for example that there were both orthodox Stalinists and orthodox Maoists, despite those having very different ideals).
What I mean is that the Bolshevik/Menshevik split was about Lenin’s assertion that every member of their then-unified party must be fully committed the party platform in its entirety, while the Mensheviks wanted a more inclusive membership that allowed people who more generally believed in some Marxist principles and weren’t die hard career revolutionaries fully committed to every ideal of Lenin’s. “Orthodox” here just means absolute adherence to a set of ideals.
[deleted] t1_j64k5jd wrote
Reply to comment by bobrobor in A firefighter's 1943 photos of the Warsaw Ghetto uprising have been found by Geek-Haven888
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j64i6y6 wrote
[deleted]
BigGreenBallOfLuck t1_j64gdiv wrote
All I want to know... Is there any liquid I can drink? No? Not interested lol (sarcasm, not ignorance)
Laowaii87 t1_j64g46o wrote
Reply to comment by baumpop in Longest ‘dako’ iron sword at 2.6m, along with a unique shield-shaped mirror, found in 4th-century Japanese burial mound — Finds indicate that the technology of the Kofun period (300-710 AD) was more advanced than previously thought by marketrent
Exactly "i've even heard stories of" that's not a source, that is hearsay
enfiel t1_j64g2oh wrote
Reply to comment by dai_rip in The Forgotten History of Gay Entrapment: Routine arrests were the linchpin of a social system intended to humiliate LGBTQ people by PhillipCrawfordJr
No, I'm just saying you can't compare that to nazi treatment.
madpiratebippy t1_j64fyx6 wrote
Don’t let the Victorians know they’ll eat it!
Bentresh t1_j64bile wrote
Reply to comment by Stalins_Moustachio in Bookclub and Sources Wednesday! by AutoModerator
I second this. The Met publications are almost uniformly excellent, and their volume on the MK is an up-to-date and beautifully illustrated overview.
The Middle Kingdom of Ancient Egypt: History, Archaeology and Society by Wolfram Grajetzki and Daily Life in Ancient Egypt by Kasia Szpakowska are also well worth a read. The latter focuses on the well-documented Middle Kingdom pyramid town of Lahun.
Eldrxtch t1_j649v6y wrote
Reply to comment by offu in Dozens of pre-Hispanic Zapotec tombs found in San Pedro Nexicho in Mexico by MeatballDom
this also makes me think of Homer’s Iliad. That was an ancient Greek writing about even more ancient greeks
Eldrxtch t1_j649qvl wrote
Reply to comment by offu in Dozens of pre-Hispanic Zapotec tombs found in San Pedro Nexicho in Mexico by MeatballDom
and Olmec, Chichimec, Purhépecha
KeeperofQueensCorgis t1_j646rjb wrote
Reply to comment by mobyhex in Bookclub and Sources Wednesday! by AutoModerator
> The Best and the Brightest
Is this the book that tries to explain how the US got itself into the situation it did in Vietnam despite having the 'best and the brightest' minds in the country in charge?
War_Hymn t1_j646hrz wrote
Reply to comment by Ok-Goose-6320 in What's the earliest case of iron-smelting with hard evidence? by Ok-Goose-6320
I don't see how having bronze tools or weapons would had protect them from germs that they had little immunity to. Before the Spanish even stepped foot in the Incan Empire, smallpox and other Old World diseases had already spread via regional trade network and killed millions of their subjects (including the Incan emperor himself). The reduction in population and the political turmoil it caused was enough to weaken this powerful state to a point where a couple hundred Spanish conquistadors was able to conquer it.
Even if they managed to kill every European they laid eyes on, these diseases would had eventually depleted their population and weaken their political/economic systems enough that the next wave of Europeans would eventually succeed in taking over.
>Presumably because their fires weren't hot enough to reliably cast high quality bronze.
Except they were casting copper or arsenic bronze (they never figured out tin-bronze) before the Europeans arrived. They just didn't have a lot of copper deposits, so stone tools were more economical and widespread.
baumpop t1_j645ve9 wrote
sundayscome t1_j644v6n wrote
Reply to Bookclub and Sources Wednesday! by AutoModerator
Can someone pls recommend a book on India before British imperialism? Quick google searches have shown me books that quickly set up the context but focus more on British rule.
Clingykoala1994 t1_j65bnew wrote
Reply to comment by creativeoutsider101 in Bookclub and Sources Wednesday! by AutoModerator
Stephen fry is a favorite of mine. Great story teller