Recent comments in /f/history
[deleted] t1_j6lkcgm wrote
Reply to What Secrets Lie Beneath This 17th-Century French Aristocrat's Smile? by Professional_Bite725
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j6lk494 wrote
Reply to What Secrets Lie Beneath This 17th-Century French Aristocrat's Smile? by Professional_Bite725
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j6ljwav wrote
Reply to What Secrets Lie Beneath This 17th-Century French Aristocrat's Smile? by Professional_Bite725
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j6lizgl wrote
Reply to What Secrets Lie Beneath This 17th-Century French Aristocrat's Smile? by Professional_Bite725
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j6li48k wrote
Reply to What Secrets Lie Beneath This 17th-Century French Aristocrat's Smile? by Professional_Bite725
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j6lhxjd wrote
Reply to What Secrets Lie Beneath This 17th-Century French Aristocrat's Smile? by Professional_Bite725
[removed]
Refrigerator_Either t1_j6lgbi0 wrote
Basically, how is this era of rule from Ming dynasty relevant today? And what about the opium use? Yeah, mainly Im curious in similarities, between the opiate thing we have going in America, and how it went back in the Ming or Qing dynasty eras? How do they correlate?
[deleted] t1_j6lftxj wrote
Reply to What Secrets Lie Beneath This 17th-Century French Aristocrat's Smile? by Professional_Bite725
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j6kkp0f wrote
Reply to comment by Ok-Goose-6320 in What's the earliest case of iron-smelting with hard evidence? by Ok-Goose-6320
[removed]
Ok-Goose-6320 OP t1_j6kj5rd wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in What's the earliest case of iron-smelting with hard evidence? by Ok-Goose-6320
Sounds like a religion more than a science.
I suggest you start a thread about the historicity of this, if you're so confident in it. Link me if you do decide to start one.
[deleted] t1_j6kebhh wrote
Reply to comment by Ok-Goose-6320 in What's the earliest case of iron-smelting with hard evidence? by Ok-Goose-6320
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j6kdwqi wrote
Reply to comment by Ok-Goose-6320 in What's the earliest case of iron-smelting with hard evidence? by Ok-Goose-6320
[removed]
Ok-Goose-6320 OP t1_j6kc81x wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in What's the earliest case of iron-smelting with hard evidence? by Ok-Goose-6320
? Yeah, because they were capped with gold and covered in limestone. They shined brilliantly as a result.
So it reflects sunlight, which can be used for power... but not in any useful or focused way.
[deleted] t1_j6kbwse wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in What's the earliest case of iron-smelting with hard evidence? by Ok-Goose-6320
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j6k819a wrote
Reply to comment by Ok-Goose-6320 in What's the earliest case of iron-smelting with hard evidence? by Ok-Goose-6320
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j6k7dyy wrote
Reply to comment by Ok-Goose-6320 in What's the earliest case of iron-smelting with hard evidence? by Ok-Goose-6320
[removed]
Ok-Goose-6320 OP t1_j6k0foc wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in What's the earliest case of iron-smelting with hard evidence? by Ok-Goose-6320
Err... generating power from pyramids? I thought it sounded that style.
Pyramids are decent lightning rods, like anything tall and pointy (and massive)... but there's no way to gather that power. Mountains also "generate a lot of power," but there's no way to harness that to a useful purpose, either.
The pyramids were tombs.
Forsaken_Champion722 t1_j6jyw74 wrote
Reply to comment by Head-Sherbet-9675 in Simple/Short/Silly History Questions Saturday! by AutoModerator
Women in some Muslim countries walk around completely covered in the scorching heat.
c4hokian t1_j6jvjpd wrote
Reply to comment by throwawayphaccount in Bookclub and Sources Wednesday! by AutoModerator
If you've read GGS read 1491
[deleted] t1_j6jubp0 wrote
Reply to comment by Ok-Goose-6320 in What's the earliest case of iron-smelting with hard evidence? by Ok-Goose-6320
[removed]
Mitzvahgolem_613 t1_j6jr5x2 wrote
Reply to What proof is there that Dr. John Kellogg (that Kellogg) circumcised himself at age 37? by dazzlingupstairz
Kellogg was kinda bizarre and into eugenics I understand . Correct me if I am wrong.
Ok-Goose-6320 OP t1_j6jdv7g wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in What's the earliest case of iron-smelting with hard evidence? by Ok-Goose-6320
A semi conductor tech? How does that work? Could you explain that, please?
​
I expect neither Anatolia nor CA could've produced a lot of high quality iron/steel, or else the iron age would've started. Iron was also noted to be very expensive, sometimes worth more than gold, through that era.
Late Hittites were accepting iron as tribute in minas, so it was treated like a precious metal. Possibly a way they were getting iron was as a byproduct of the bronze/copper industry, collected semi-smelted iron nuggets that were a defect in the copper ore.
[deleted] t1_j6jb8rt wrote
Reply to Can someone explain to me why exactly Wu Tzu Hsu (6c. BC) was executed? by AlwaysBored10711
[removed]
dpdxguy t1_j6j3pmr wrote
Reply to comment by DaFugYouSay in The Chickens and the Bulls: The Rise and Incredible Fall of a Vicious Extortion Ring That Preyed on Prominent Gay Men in the 1960s by PhillipCrawfordJr
>nobody would have bothered blackmailing them in the first place.
The article clearly states that the extortion ring went after targets big and small.
However, it also seems clear that the primary reason the police went after the extortion ring was that it was making the police look bad to the powers that be. IOW, it's the police that would not have bothered if (some of) the victims had not been wealthy and powerful
[deleted] t1_j6ln3rv wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in What Secrets Lie Beneath This 17th-Century French Aristocrat's Smile? by Professional_Bite725
[removed]