Recent comments in /f/history
Cxlow91 t1_j9rkyqm wrote
Whatever the sapiens do in the bedroom is their business
[deleted] t1_j9rh8ur wrote
Reply to comment by Cleistheknees in Homo sapiens may have brought archery to Europe about 54,000 years ago by Yazan_Research
[deleted]
einsteinfrankenstein t1_j9rfr88 wrote
Reply to Bookclub and Sources Wednesday! by AutoModerator
What are some popular and fairly unbiased introduction to world history for people who are generally not interested in history?
Trying to get someone (a non-Westerner who has been living here since an early age) interested in reading about history, but I do know they're not interested except for a mild curiosity about world history. They're through a stage in their life where they may want to use history to make sense of their life. But I'm not familiar with books on world history myself, only with specific areas (e.g., science history).
Now, I know there is no escaping that history will have its biases, and that a book written by an English-speaking author in a Western country and for Western readership will likely have some degree of pro-Western biases. And that a popular world history book of only a few hundred pages will necessarily simplify history and leave out important events.
But some works of history are based on stronger scholarship than others, which have a political agenda or are written by people without the necessary educational background. So it's not all the same, but at the same time no work is "perfect."
So I want to ask for your help in getting some recommendations. Appreciate it.
blahblahrasputan t1_j9rej2p wrote
Reply to comment by AquaVada in Homo sapiens may have brought archery to Europe about 54,000 years ago by Yazan_Research
Australian Aboriginals didn't use a bow and arrow though. Or is that not what you meant?
A_Fat_Pokemon t1_j9rdhgi wrote
Reply to comment by snail360 in Homo sapiens may have brought archery to Europe about 54,000 years ago by Yazan_Research
One-shot 100 ungulates to unlock a new camo for the bow
AangAndTheFireLord t1_j9rchzw wrote
Reply to comment by DisciplineFancy4290 in Homo sapiens may have brought archery to Europe about 54,000 years ago by Yazan_Research
That was a sick expansion pack for sure.
Cleistheknees t1_j9raapp wrote
Reply to comment by snail360 in Homo sapiens may have brought archery to Europe about 54,000 years ago by Yazan_Research
I don’t think your mom would appreciate you talking about her like that
[deleted] t1_j9r9zg0 wrote
[removed]
snail360 t1_j9r6qtb wrote
Reply to comment by Cleistheknees in Homo sapiens may have brought archery to Europe about 54,000 years ago by Yazan_Research
actually I could easily one shot any large ungulate
MeatballDom t1_j9r5kne wrote
Reply to comment by GEARHEADGus in Weekly History Questions Thread. by AutoModerator
it can be tough, but the first place to start would be in the works of the most recent studies on the topic published for an academic audience. Look for ones that are published by University of _____ Press, and the like. Usually there will be a historiography in the introduction or first chapter. This isn't a universal rule, but it's the quickest way.
Now if you are studying to be a historian, building your own is good practice and a skill you'll need to get down before you get to the postgraduate level. Again, you'd want to start with the most recent academic works published by university presses and the like. Things that are peer-reviewed, and written for an academic audience. See who they keep mentioning, who they keep citing, and note whether it's in agreement, or disagreement. Then trace that back, who are those people citing, who are they discussing, and again their thoughts. What new evidence or approaches are they bringing to the table? Eventually it will become evident who the big dogs are, the most impactful works, study those ones well. Build an annotated bibliography to help keep things sorted (and to remind you of what you've already read and the gist of it) and then once you have that solid foundation it's about then approaching it from the start and showing how the field grew, and changed, over time and what's now missing and how your own research will fit into that gap.
Cleistheknees t1_j9r3b6v wrote
Reply to comment by AquaVada in Homo sapiens may have brought archery to Europe about 54,000 years ago by Yazan_Research
Large game is far more amenable to persistence predation, and non-fatal injuries are a vital part of that hunting style. It’s almost impossible to drop a large ungulate with a single shot, even with the most advanced compound bows available today, with carbon fiber shafts and titanium heads and all kinds of TactiCool gizmos.
-Vayra- t1_j9r3ai2 wrote
Reply to comment by 2spicy4dapepper in Homo sapiens may have brought archery to Europe about 54,000 years ago by Yazan_Research
The question is more when. Did it come with the first migrations out of Africa? Or did it come in later migrations? Or was the concept independently developed n Europe? Or somewhere else (Eurasian steppes would be a good bet) and brought from there to Europe instead of from Africa?
[deleted] t1_j9r2kqu wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Homo sapiens may have brought archery to Europe about 54,000 years ago by Yazan_Research
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9r2e99 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Homo sapiens may have brought archery to Europe about 54,000 years ago by Yazan_Research
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9r261r wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Homo sapiens may have brought archery to Europe about 54,000 years ago by Yazan_Research
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9r21lf wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Homo sapiens may have brought archery to Europe about 54,000 years ago by Yazan_Research
[removed]
LongjumpingNatural22 t1_j9r0hrk wrote
Reply to comment by 1questions in Researchers explore 300-year-old time capsule from pirate ship sunk off Cape Cod by ArtOak
personality is far more important when it comes to drunken sailors
wildskipper t1_j9qzl2e wrote
Reply to comment by AnaphoricReference in Homo sapiens may have brought archery to Europe about 54,000 years ago by Yazan_Research
Hunters coming from tropical rainforest environments would also have access to types of wood far harder than the more common hard woods. I could only speculate that some of this might have been suitable for making some impressively sharp arrows/spears.
clamshellconundrum t1_j9qz8oe wrote
Reply to comment by GSilky in Homo sapiens may have brought archery to Europe about 54,000 years ago by Yazan_Research
Tooling marks are very obvious from natural rock formations.
[deleted] t1_j9qylbl wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Homo sapiens may have brought archery to Europe about 54,000 years ago by Yazan_Research
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9qxq8s wrote
Reply to comment by GSilky in Homo sapiens may have brought archery to Europe about 54,000 years ago by Yazan_Research
[removed]
Blue-Purity t1_j9qxfae wrote
Cmon guys it’s 2023. They’re LGBTQ sapiens.
jlfern t1_j9qx0wt wrote
Reply to comment by poweradmincom in Researchers explore 300-year-old time capsule from pirate ship sunk off Cape Cod by ArtOak
Sweden is certainly on my list of places to revisit but I don't think it's happening this year sadly
cylonfrakbbq t1_j9qwg2o wrote
They still are pulling up stuff from the Wydah. The new museum (not the old one in P Town) is fantastic. Tons of artifacts on display (from pirate weapons to dinner implements to actual treasure) and you can even see artifacts trapped inside concretions that they are slowly trying to free.
LoreChano t1_j9rnnh7 wrote
Reply to comment by DisciplineFancy4290 in Homo sapiens may have brought archery to Europe about 54,000 years ago by Yazan_Research
The most amazing thing is how did they even come up with bows and arrows in the first place. An atlatl is kind of obvious, maybe, it's just an extension of your arm, someone might have realized it eventually. But a bow? That's much harder and much less obvious. Humanity took millennia to invent much more obvious things such as the wheel or monjolos.
Using wood's elastic proprieties is not obvious at all. Choosing the right kind and shape is essential. Bows also have no "prototype stage", a bow either works perfectly or it is useless. Someone 50k years ago came up with completely useful bows capable or hunting at least small animals. This person must've been a genius.