Recent comments in /f/history
GOLDIEM_J t1_j9sv5os wrote
Reply to comment by Doctor_Impossible_ in Weekly History Questions Thread. by AutoModerator
So do you believe that the issue was entirely a moral one for the British? Or was it just for the international PR?
throway_nonjw t1_j9sop3a wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in When a builder found a dirty old boot under Hobart barracks, little did he know he'd stumbled upon rare treasure - Major find for early colonial history in Australia. by ArtOak
Cloth, especially cheap-made cloth used by the working class, would probably fall apart and rot, I guess.
[deleted] t1_j9soilv wrote
Jubililly t1_j9soer4 wrote
Reply to comment by No-Strength-6805 in Bookclub and Sources Wednesday! by AutoModerator
I will - Thank you!
maximillian_arturo t1_j9snh0n wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in When a builder found a dirty old boot under Hobart barracks, little did he know he'd stumbled upon rare treasure - Major find for early colonial history in Australia. by ArtOak
I mean fabric doesn't hold up as well as metal. Same reason why all old manuscripts are written on stone or clay. Cause the manuscripts that were written on less durable materials, like papyrus, just deteriorate over time.
And people don't really see the need to hold on to old, worn clothing. If you find it 20 years after people stop wearing it, it's just old clothes. It doesn't become interesting for a couple hundred years. At that point most of it will have been thrown out, repurchased, or just disintegrated.
Similar to the jeans that were worn by original gold miners out west in the US. There are people who search through old mine shafts just searching for denim. It's valuable because there aren't many that have made it.
AlamutJones t1_j9smbyr wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in When a builder found a dirty old boot under Hobart barracks, little did he know he'd stumbled upon rare treasure - Major find for early colonial history in Australia. by ArtOak
I mean, extant complete or near-complete textiles are rare. They don’t last long without being cared for
[deleted] t1_j9slwgc wrote
[deleted] t1_j9sloq3 wrote
Reply to comment by Cleistheknees in Homo sapiens may have brought archery to Europe about 54,000 years ago by Yazan_Research
[deleted]
Thelastpieceofthepie t1_j9slboo wrote
Not just wrestling check out how many duels
[deleted] t1_j9sjl3y wrote
Reply to comment by Khtie in Homo sapiens may have brought archery to Europe about 54,000 years ago by Yazan_Research
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9sinqf wrote
[deleted] t1_j9sifl6 wrote
[deleted] t1_j9shhil wrote
Jewrisprudent t1_j9sg2t1 wrote
Reply to comment by ToasterSmokes in Homo sapiens may have brought archery to Europe about 54,000 years ago by Yazan_Research
In a way it’s always exponentially advancing, it’s just when you’re in the middle of exponential growth nearly all of the absolute growth has occurred recently.
CharonsLittleHelper t1_j9sfcu1 wrote
Reply to comment by LoreChano in Homo sapiens may have brought archery to Europe about 54,000 years ago by Yazan_Research
To be pedantic - it wasn't the wheel which had to be invented. That IS obvious. It's the axel which was the big invention. Civilizations without the axel still used log rollers etc. to move big heavy things.
snail360 t1_j9seq9a wrote
Reply to comment by A_Fat_Pokemon in Homo sapiens may have brought archery to Europe about 54,000 years ago by Yazan_Research
1000th kill congratulations you have unlocked Peter Griffin Ungulate
[deleted] t1_j9semef wrote
Tomon2 t1_j9sde6t wrote
Reply to comment by AquaVada in Homo sapiens may have brought archery to Europe about 54,000 years ago by Yazan_Research
Funny you mention kangaroos, it's likely that only the tree kangaroos of PNG have been hunted with bows.
Indigenous Australians never developed bow hunting technology - instead using spears and Woomera (spear throwers), along with boomerangs to hunt large game like Australian kangaroos.
[deleted] t1_j9sd74k wrote
MongoBongoTown t1_j9sbsk6 wrote
Reply to comment by ToasterSmokes in Homo sapiens may have brought archery to Europe about 54,000 years ago by Yazan_Research
It's crazy looking at this with military tech.
A Roman Army from 250 BCE could very possibly defeat a Celtic Army from 1000 years in the future.
But...an Army from 1960 would be absolutely decimated by a modern military.
[deleted] t1_j9sblgb wrote
Reply to comment by Khtie in Homo sapiens may have brought archery to Europe about 54,000 years ago by Yazan_Research
[deleted]
Doctor_Impossible_ t1_j9t5d0u wrote
Reply to comment by raviolijr in Weekly History Questions Thread. by AutoModerator
No, and 'Britain' wasn't importing it into China. It was imported by merchants that were British, American, Indian, and Chinese. Neither the Royal Navy nor the East India Company imported opium into China before the Opium War, because it was technically illegal, despite usage being commonplace. Independent traders imported it, and handed it off to Chinese smugglers before it reached China, because foreigners, outside of some very small enclaves, were not allowed into China.