Recent comments in /f/history
[deleted] t1_jbfxy0s wrote
[removed]
Stalins_Moustachio t1_jbfxt7q wrote
Reply to comment by ZiggySTRDST in Bookclub and Sources Wednesday! by AutoModerator
I've heard nothing but praise for the second book! Haven't read it myself (yet).
ocasas t1_jbfx83d wrote
Reply to comment by ubzrvnT in Humans Started Riding Horses 5,000 Years Ago, New Evidence Suggests by Magister_Xehanort
Yeah, that's how it is taught in most romance language speaking countries: Six continents one of those being America.
And yes, when we say "American history", we include North, Central and South America there. Hence why when you say 'americans had llamas?' I don't think of the US founding fathers, but of the Incas.
Don't you think it is weird to have your country co-opt the name of it's continent? America inside North America? Imagine calling someone from Louisiana 'south american', you have to get by using 'southern'.
The only other country I can't think of of this happening is South Africa, but they always use 'South' so there is no mistaking it for anything else.
dropbear123 t1_jbfx2ze wrote
Reply to Bookclub and Sources Wednesday! by AutoModerator
Finished one book a few days ago Shots From The Front: The British Soldier 1914-18 by Richard Holmes
>3/5
>Covers all the main information about the tactics and life of British soldiers during the First World War combined with lots of pictures. Good mix of areas, not just the Western Front. The photos are also good quality in the hardback version I read plus there is a lot of commentary (what it shows, whether it was staged or genuine, when it was probably taken) etc and links in the text to the photos, rather than the photos just being completely random. Of the photos my favourite is probably number 47 which shows a woman from the Women's Royal Naval Service training the soldiers on how to use the gas masks. The writing was fine but for me personally I felt there was a little bit too much on regiments and uniform details, but it is a rather short book so it didn't drag too much.
>While the book was fine and I would recommend it if you can find or see a cheap copy I was also sort of disappointed with it. I've read a quite a few of Holmes' books and really enjoyed them all (in particular 'Tommy' which is a lot more in-depth about the WWI British soldiers, 'Redcoat' about the 18th and 19th century soldiers and 'Sahib' about British soldiers in India up to WWI) but this one just didn't work as well for me and I can't really say why.
ZiggySTRDST t1_jbfw30p wrote
Reply to Bookclub and Sources Wednesday! by AutoModerator
I want to read a book on Arthur Wellesley and I’m trying to decide between Elizabeth Langford’s Years of the Sword/Pillar of State and Richard Holmes Wellington: The Iron Duke. Just wondering which people here would recommend?
tanathosX t1_jbfw1o2 wrote
Reply to comment by War_Hymn in Humans Started Riding Horses 5,000 Years Ago, New Evidence Suggests by Magister_Xehanort
>5 feet 3 inches
which is the size of 14 yo nowadays :p
[deleted] t1_jbfv71y wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in how were american actions against the soviet union were justified during the cold war? by im_in-need-of_help
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jbfufe4 wrote
SpaceShipRat t1_jbfssqc wrote
Reply to comment by StekenDeluxe in Humans Started Riding Horses 5,000 Years Ago, New Evidence Suggests by Magister_Xehanort
what comes to mind is the minoan bull rodeos, where they'd do just that, hop over a bull, do handstands, it's not a strange idea that someone would try the same kind of rodeo with horses.
Smrtihara t1_jbfsi2k wrote
Reply to Egypt archaeology: Dig unearths smiling mini-sphinx which may represent Claudius by egg_static5
Did.. you just send me to yahoo news..?
[deleted] t1_jbfrqwy wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in how were american actions against the soviet union were justified during the cold war? by im_in-need-of_help
[removed]
HermanCainsGhost t1_jbfrnqu wrote
Reply to comment by War_Hymn in Humans Started Riding Horses 5,000 Years Ago, New Evidence Suggests by Magister_Xehanort
By “populations were smaller”, I meant there were less people, not that they were of shorter stature, sorry for the confusion
Birziaks t1_jbfr61x wrote
Reply to comment by OMightyMartian in Humans Started Riding Horses 5,000 Years Ago, New Evidence Suggests by Magister_Xehanort
*nókʷts - naktis in lithuanian, or nakts in my local dialect. You can adress me as mister proto Indo-European from now on, thank you very much.
War_Hymn t1_jbfqice wrote
Reply to comment by HermanCainsGhost in Humans Started Riding Horses 5,000 Years Ago, New Evidence Suggests by Magister_Xehanort
Doesn't adult height in a demographics usually has to do with nutritional factors?
ploploplo OP t1_jbfpmgc wrote
Reply to In the summer of 1897, 20 Black U.S. Army infantrymen cycled 1,900 miles on fixed-gear, state-of-the-art bikes from Fort Missoula, Mont., to St. Louis. The Army ordered the grueling expedition to see whether soldiers could form a bicycle corps. by ploploplo
I had no idea about this 1897 expedition till I read this article about a man who reenacted the journey. On that note, kudos to him for regenerating interest in this fascinating moment in history.
[deleted] t1_jbfp42v wrote
[removed]
War_Hymn t1_jbfoxqy wrote
Reply to comment by tanathosX in Humans Started Riding Horses 5,000 Years Ago, New Evidence Suggests by Magister_Xehanort
Average male height in New Kingdom Egypt was 5 feet 3 inches.
iLynux t1_jbfoa18 wrote
Reply to comment by Rocktopod in Humans Started Riding Horses 5,000 Years Ago, New Evidence Suggests by Magister_Xehanort
What I meant was, everyone on Earth knew about night, and would've been using language to describe it, regardless of what people thousands of miles away call it. Horses were not everywhere on Earth, and so the first people to encounter and domesticate them kinda got dibs on what they were called.
War_Hymn t1_jbfntph wrote
Reply to comment by Doctor_Impossible_ in Humans Started Riding Horses 5,000 Years Ago, New Evidence Suggests by Magister_Xehanort
If you have a decent saddle. But most early horsemen (including the Macedonian companion cavalrymen that rode with Alexander the Great) had nothing more than a thick blanket or hide to cushion the back of the horse. This sort of riding took a lot more skill.
[deleted] t1_jbfn7qt wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in how were american actions against the soviet union were justified during the cold war? by im_in-need-of_help
[removed]
Birziaks t1_jbfmoos wrote
Reply to comment by jeffersonairmattress in Humans Started Riding Horses 5,000 Years Ago, New Evidence Suggests by Magister_Xehanort
No need to for that, just go to central Asia. Kumis is still widely consumed
[deleted] t1_jbfmf2z wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in how were american actions against the soviet union were justified during the cold war? by im_in-need-of_help
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jbflmo9 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in how were american actions against the soviet union were justified during the cold war? by im_in-need-of_help
[removed]
Who_dat604 t1_jbfljkt wrote
Reply to Bookclub and Sources Wednesday! by AutoModerator
The Far Land: 200 Years of Murder, Mania, and Mutiny in the South Pacific It about the mutiny of the hms bounty and the story of pitcarin Island
River of Darkness: Francisco Orellana's Legendary Voyage of Death and Discovery Down the Amazon Book by Buddy Levy
An account of orellanas journey down the Amazon the people and cheifdoms they encounter
[deleted] t1_jbfy1qp wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in how were american actions against the soviet union were justified during the cold war? by im_in-need-of_help
[removed]