There are serious methodological flaws with this survey.

Hi, care to explain some of it's flaws? It's meant to be more of a perception survey to identify what people know and what their interests would be.

Certainly. The questions don't include all the options they seem like they should, and don't have an option for "none".

Also, is Worcester the city, metro, or county?

Thanks for your criticisms, I really appreciate it. Just included some of your suggestions!

Does that mean I get an authorship credit?

Oh, also, and I should have included this, I'm not sure if you're aware but counties barely mean anything in Massachusetts

Got you, I'll change it to city.

"Metro" would probably get you a cleaner outcome if you're looking for the people in the Worcester city area and adjacent communities. People from somewhere like Gardner might select themselves out.

I might sneak your username into the website somewhere, Thanks again for all your help!

True but the provisions trickle down through local government authority, so towns within the metro area would need their own administrators to submit grant applications.

Then you want city, because the county abolished itself.

i hate to say it, but i'm pretty sure you can't use reddit to help with your government job. it is a bit unprofessional.