Too busy trying to convince me I’m actually two people to read my comment and see the change?

I don’t own a house.

Do you get your tinfoil hats custom-fitted?

Lol, it's just a coincidence, brah. I'm a musician and my username is how to write a G-clef in music -- a J, a P, and a jellyroll.

By the way, did you buy a house with a backyard yet? You gotta let 'em sleep back there.

1. That homeless shelters have that rule, among several, is not evidence that these individuals were not in the shelters because of that rule.

2. Medically, no. It is not.

3. Bad rule but as we have seen, irrelevant unless you can prove that’s the issue.

But also, where then should they go?

It could change but it had not.

I believe Lupa Zoo has a capybara, you may also try Forest Park Zoo. And for the record (for those opposed) a capybara that’s been raised in a zoo is going to be plenty social and happy to receive human attention, I promise you. Look into their temperament and behaviors, they’re like giant chill Guinea pigs.

>“Willing to become sober”. > >1. Prove this.

Ok, can you list the requirements for the homeless shelters around that area?

>2. That’s not just a matter of a simple decision.

It is though.

>3. So what if they were not?

As we have witnessed, they are not allowed in the homeless shelters (for safety reasons).

And that context can never change? u/LetMeSleepNoEleven declares the context parameters for all future comments? No one can post to a public forum under you if they don’t follow your rules? Of course not.

I know you never said they shouldn’t sleep in your yard, which is why I specifically mentioned “on your property” to make that abundantly clear, which you also had an issue with.

Irrelevant.

Posting on Reddit doesn't really advance your cause.

“Willing to become sober”.

1. Prove this.
2. That’s not just a matter of a simple decision.
3. So what if they were not?

[deleted]

The questions you asked me were within the established context. I never said that homeless people should not sleep in my yard.

Quite the opposite.

>What land would you propose? What land is not “someone else’s”?

If those people were willing to become sober, there are plenty of places that would take them in.

They decided not to be sober, so they need to find a place that can accommodate them.

Is it OK for homeless people to pollute that river?

Going from their pen to the truck? Truck to viewing location? What happens if the truck breaks down? Isn’t the notion a little naive-putting these animals at risk for whose pleasure?

Yes, and? Are we not allowed to deviate from what you and the other commenters were discussing? The conversation can’t flow from that topic?

You were clearly not caring about anyone else’s security or liability other than your own, so I addressed that with a better example.

My response, which I quoted, was in the context of them living on your property. That was clear from the response.

[deleted]

Yourself among them.

My response, which you quoted, was in the context of them living in my house. That was clear from the exchange.

No I didn’t.

I quoted part of your comment and asked you a follow up question related to that quoted piece. In my response I directly stated “on your property” not anything to do with in your house. See my original response to you,

> I’m fully aware you understand that my security is at risk if random people live in my house but Walmart’s security is not at risk if they live next to the parking lot.

>Why would you have security and liability issues from allowing a group to live on your property, but Walmart would not? Walmart is absolutely at risk if people are living on their property, and they continue to allow them to do so.

I have never suggested they live in your house, nor have I suggested that is equivalent. I simply asked why you cared about your liability while ignoring the liability on the Walmart property.

I still have no idea why you think the person you keep linking is me, is your tin foil hat too tight? Or is it just easier to blame that instead of addressing what I said?

> Peabody

Also on the coastline.

You'd be using like 10x more electricity with baseboard.

I’d assume in truck of sorts, we haven’t yet mastered teleportation

But how would they get from the zoo to the school?