Recent comments in /f/massachusetts

cajloapo t1_j42jpak wrote

It’s piddly twiddly widdly winks

Festering capitalism and wealth inequality blow that out of the water, you’re just spinning wheels on bandaid concessions. It helps maybe short term but not much overall

Bernie was right

This is is hostile society that half of the people here push forth just because they bought into the idea that they need to hollow their humanhood out so the wealthy asshole can get 5 more jets or sports cars

1

net1994 OP t1_j42hfoq wrote

1/12/23 UPDATE:

Just got the new bill since the one discussed here. It's for a 3 week period and the bill came to $133 for just 52 therms used with an actual read-not estimated. FINALLY the reading was accurate and matched up to the daily readings I had been doing on the meter. We literally have not turned on the heat since the last bill. In fact for this cycle, we used about 50% less gas than the Dec 2021 bill.

With that said, I'm not sure if I still have any "leg to stand on" in trying to dispute the insanely high last bill. How can I tell them something was/is wrong even though the most recent bill was accurate? Thoughts?

1

IntelligentMeal40 t1_j42hbig wrote

I don’t know how it works in Massachusetts but I’m in New Hampshire the shelters are pretty much always full. I also know that a lot of the housing authorities have stopped taking waitlist applications for section 8 because it’s a wait list is about nine years long in most places. Public housing is probably a shorter wait, but it still takes a couple years.

6

IntelligentMeal40 t1_j42h2pf wrote

Yeah if there’s a car I don’t get it. If they don’t have transportation it absolutely makes sense to me that someone will need to be around where they get services, where their doctors office is, whatever. But when I worked in Chelsea Massachusetts and I ended up moving in with my friend in Maine I drove to work until I found a new place to work closer to home. I didn’t live in my car. WTF?

1

GimmeDatZig t1_j42ga58 wrote

Not all, but most. I live on the border Vermont, and if you saw the amount of idiots on the highway with Connecticut plates that are in such a hurry to get to the ski lodges, then, yeah, you would understand. New Yorkers too.

1

Notmystationbro t1_j42cy0y wrote

1

Banea-Vaedr t1_j42afn7 wrote

>I’m guessing we’re going to ignore hundreds of major riots and mass-marches… But yes, Northern Whites and their philosophy did push it through Congress.

Marches mean nothing when you don't have the guns to make it work. Selma was a tactical disaster, for example. What it did was draw support from people with guns who would otherwise not have been sympathetic.

>There is a right side of history: The side that won.

The side that won so far. There is no permanent victory. It's entirely possible that in 200 years, the fall of the nazi regime is discussed as the greatest tragedy ever to befall mankind.

1

Codspear t1_j429772 wrote

> They didn’t do that. Sympathetic White Northerners and the 101st Airbourne did. If you don’t have the force to back up your proclamations, they don’t matter.

I’m guessing we’re going to ignore hundreds of major riots and mass-marches… But yes, Northern Whites and their philosophy did push it through Congress.

> History is not a narrative or a grand march to a leftist utopia.

In case you didn’t notice, I’m critiquing you from the right.

> It doesnt end. There are no “sides of history”. If Hitler stayed out of France and we’d be singing the praises of the Nazis for standing up to the genocidal Soviets.

There is a right side of history: The side that won.

2