Recent comments in /f/massachusetts

Linux-Is-Best t1_j6en5ud wrote

I work full-time and would be out of work before 4.

Monday I'll be working 6-3 (9 hours). Anyone who works 7-3 (8 hours) or 8-4 (8 hours) could do it too. I imagine someone working part-time could also easily make that schedule.

Arguably, if the protest lasted longer than 1 hour, someone working 9-5 could still show up.

−70

UniWheel t1_j6eij5j wrote

>This is why I don't go to the mall.

I won't deny that I felt lucky that I managed to get my twice a year desire to visit the Hampshire Mall out of my system a week previous.

But the reality is that there's more danger in driving to the mall than in being there - road fatalities in MA are twice as common as homicides, and the majority of homicide victims were (even if through no fault of their own) parties to an existing conflict - death as an uninvolved homicide victim like this is horrifying in its violence and randomness, but extremely rare in the scope of risks we face in our everyday lives.

We should absolutely not accept shootings or other homicides at any rate.

But driving carefully and defensively makes more practical difference than refusing to do ordinary things would.

6

UniWheel t1_j6egyfx wrote

>And now seeing this just puts my fear and worry into reality.

We absolutely should not accept things like this happening.

But in terms of managing fear it's useful to keep two things in mind:

  1. Road fatalities in Massachusetts are twice as common as homicides; you're more likely to be killed on the way to the mall than once there
  2. Homicides in Massachusetts are less than half the national average

And those numbers are looking at homicides overall, which are dominated by situations where there is an existing and known (even if one-sided) conflict between the parties. A bystander being killed is shocking and horrifying, but it is also even less common - the rate of "random" homicides is really very very low in terms of the risks we face when going about our lives.

3