>Maybe the owner is a victim.

I'm not sure how you jumped to this conclusion from a listing of a lost dog.

Please don’t burn or destroy things

Completely agree - but wanted to share that it was not just a hoe Rogan trend. I feel horrible for the victim but it should be done safely not alone in the ocean at night. :(

It’s about understanding mental health and how dramatically it can change a person’s behavior. When someone is depressed, you don’t turn your back on them and this is that to the millionth degree.

It could be a coping mechanism. To fully embrace the anger and frustration he's likely feeling right now might drive him mad. But I do think people should entertain forgiveness more often than they seem to in this world. I'm not saying this woman shouldn't be punished, but punishment never brings back the victims or heals the family of the victims. Holding onto anger and hate is self-destructive.

[deleted]

The show is trying to finally put an end to the "where does Western Mass start" debate. It starts ten miles west of Boston.

Look at the state of our public school system and come back.

He looks kind of chill and happy.

You'd think if he was abused the SPCA wouldn't be so motivated to reunite him with his owners.

> There's a reason 9A exists, and it's to prevent labor unions - who do not hold public office of any kind - from holding public services hostage as a negotiating tactic.

Public workers need to be able to bargain for good working conditions. Otherwise, they're just going to quit and public services will end up being run entirely by a churn of bad or inexperienced employees who really hate their jobs. If their bargaining power is insufficient without the ability to strike legally, then they need that option returned to their quiver.

As with anything, we need a system of checks and balances in place in order to create a healthy work environment.

Can you post to missing dog MA?

https://www.facebook.com/missingdogsmass?mibextid=LQQJ4d

Nah let’s just lose all our teachers and not solve a single thing instead because rhetoric bad.

I also live in reality and cops love to “silent strike” and leave those gaps wide open while striking is illegal. It doesn’t matter at all to them.

^this is the correct answer

This law was passed in 1919 during the first red scare because they feared communists.

That’s why it should be specific.

That’s why we need a ballot initiative to repeal it

They do this already. It's called a, "sick-out," and they can't really be punished for it because they're the ones who would do the punishing.

Our policing system needs a complete overhaul.

✊🏽😤

The problem is not that they are not allowed strikes, which is necessary because many public employees are essential and failure to work could literally kill people...

What they do NOT have is an effective alternative that forces the gov't to act on legitimate grievances. That should be added to the law.

Looks better than last time I was in Natick

If we passed it via ballot initiative the legislature would meddle like always and add their own stupid spin on it like they are legal except in cases of emergency. Then every strike is an emergency

[deleted]

[deleted]

Be suspicious of adjectivenoun### usernames with low karma. I feel like I've seen a handful of posts by accounts like these that barely make sense and can't/won't give clear answers.