Recent comments in /f/massachusetts

Linux-Is-Best t1_j6nx91i wrote

Hello,

YES, I am aware the poor dog was missing in New Hampshire. But I am also mindful that dogs (and cats) can easily cross country reasonably quickly in the wilderness. This is why an exception is made for missing or found animals from Vermont and New Hampshire. We'll also make a minor exception for towns bordering along Massachusetts from within New York, Connecticut, and Rhode Island.

While we are on the topic of pets and I have your attention, posting concerning breeding or sales of animals will not be allowed, but adoption is.

I would also like to point out that r/MassPets is also another Subreddit (I have cross-posted this there, on the OP's behalf).

1

flamethrower2 t1_j6nvnc5 wrote

It won't really do anything because the powers that be will repeal or amend it either on the effective date or shortly thereafter. They are not prohibited from doing so, although their political opponents (if any) will use that against them every election thereafter.

Even under a Republican governor, the assembly could easily do anything on which there was broad agreement among leaders, even over the governor's objection.

1

lurkandpounce t1_j6ns3b2 wrote

No, I was suggesting that instead of repealing it we ADD a new section that provides for an effective mechanism for public employees to force the handling of issues that would otherwise require a strike by other (effective - important) means.

Work stoppage by public employees like police, fire, ambulance and all other essential services could have catastrophic consequences. This approach assures both the services are not interrupted AND the issues are expeditiously handled.

−2