Heads, you win twenty dollars, tails you lose fifty dollars.

No thanks.

You're at fault when you rear end someone. Whatever excuse you make for why it happened is essentially irrelevant. The idea if you were following the 2 car lengths rule you'd have plenty of time to break.

You should watch the video of a cop taking a man's life savings under civil forfeiture. It took him 8 months to get his money back.

I agree that urban sprawl and all of its secondary effects such as light and air pollution, should be constrained. At the same time, urban apartments can never be cheap enough to make it worth living there and a public transit only environment would make it hard to escape cities.

Good point, thanks. I don't plan on any heirs but I am watching my family dealing with the fallout of my grandparents' estate. Seems like a massive burden to leave them all with even if it is equity they can use. It's still unclear to me whether it's worth it to me personally.

Considering she (Dookhan) was convicted in 2012, they really are taking their sweet time with this. What is the interest rate?

Nothing stopping you from forming an LLC with the purpose of developing dense housing. Get some investors, some lawyers and start building

Money go brrrrrr

That’s because you’ve been fooled into thinking MA is progressive or liberal

> should they be entitled to keep the gains from their illicit activities?

Your family member, morally speaking, should get their money back. Asset forfeiture should be illegal.

But those who are convicted of a crime (cough legally cough) should have assets seized.

Just look at the Motel Caswell.

The office did give the other person a citation, but I was still found at fault because I was the "last car in line". The person without the break lights hit the car in front of him, and then I hit that person. Worst part was, I just paid off my car the day before!

Get a dashcam before dashing your car ‘accidentally’ lmao

Go see an accountant, this is going to be messy and they’ll need the help.

The issue is that the state has a housing shortage of ~108,000 units. The amount we are building isn't enough to put a meaningful dent in that, so rent keeps rising. If we actually built enough to erase that deficit, rent would indeed stabilize as the supply of housing would accurately reflect the demand.

But that doesn't mean we shouldn't build what we are already building simply because it's not enough. If we stopped building what we are currently building, the deficit would get even worse and the rate of rent increase would be even worse than it already is.

Lmao … jfc… no, they definitely do not care about that.

Just look at the swarm of low level pushers enabling cop corruption, wealth disparity, on and on. The puritans here are conservative. Just because the sea of red rot that is American shifts a frame of reference doesn’t mean much. Yet here we are with all the swindled crying out about how liberal it is/ they thought it to be. Typical murrica. Heads up their asses. Clueless and beaten down. “Be grateful for what you have though1!!!!! 🥴

No doubt and I’m thankful for that, my family member turned it around.

However, should they be entitled to keep the gains from their illicit activities?

“But how do you know it was the money they received that made them do what they did? Bribes are legal.”

No brake lights you should have had the cop cite them on site

My #1 rule, stand back one car length per every ten miles an hour you're going for safe distance. More in incliment weather.

>Instead they were given a clear second chance with no history.

Just a reminder, the state did that and the blame falls squarely on the state.

Cool, we’ll there’s your answer

Downvote central here I go:

I'm out on that....urban sprawl should not be left unchecked....people who like cities great but not everything should be a city......developers are predatory...period...we've done enough damage to our world to just keep paving everything over and saying isn't is lovely...

Kevin McCarthy, R, 20th California