Of course they didn’t read the article. You expect a right wing apologist to read anything that contradicts the opinions they want?

[removed]

Yeah, I agree. It's just wild when someone tries to do this on a public forum where the posts are all available to anyone who cares to look.

Conservatives are on conspiracy theories like freaking cocaine, man.

They’re just sea-lioning

Lol 😆 Still have never heard of someone falling into a curbside receptical

They existed concurrently with Bradlee's (and, for that matter, Rich's.)

Kind of like when right wing news outlets go around spreading claims of fraud and corruption with no evidence?

You cited the SJC’s actions and now you are upset that I referenced that same resource?

You think you can bully other people around because they don’t conform to your ideology. That’s what this is about and it is coming out right now. People of your ilk made the political right into what they are the day today.

Love the keyboard detectives work here. It's all a big conspiracy!

[deleted]

[removed]

Sounds like you also shared this post on facebook

Wow I forgot about Zayer’s. Did they exist with Bradley’s or were they after?

> I am addressing each point.

Ok now you're just straight-up lying and/or delusional. It is comical that you'd think this will fly when your posts are still visible. Like, we can see that you didn't do that, dude. We can see it.

EDIT: You do know that blocking me doesn't mean that other people can't see your lies, right? Your posts are still there, dude! Everyone else knows what you're doing.

> The townies here hate anything that resembles conservative thought.

I haven't seen anything that resembles thought from Conservatives in years, and it is honestly depressing. Everyone suffers from this.

Way to move the goalposts dude. There is a world that you agree with the evaluation but disagree with the consequence. Or is your brain too mushy to contemplate that?

Maybe just take a breather here and realize your position is full of holes

Edit: did you serious just block me because you couldn’t take the discussion?

Friend, I am being charitable here. If someone can't stop spouting absolute nonsense, especially when their job requires them to appear neutral and rational, the options are, "idiot," or, "asshole." There's no third option there. Sorry, I'm just calling it like it is. I don't mean to offend your delicate sensibilities.

A slap on the wrist so that people would leave them alone? So you agree with a reprimand and not a firing? Okay then.

Did you not read the whole article? He specifically calls Biden corrupt and traitorous and accuses him of taking kickbacks from China and Ukraine. He takes a shot at Pelosi. He rants about Hunter's laptop, refers to Trump as the most investigated president in history, and makes the whole "orange man bad" joke. This isn't a judge demonstrating conservative thought. This is a judge showing clear bias based on unfounded accusations and conspiracies. As a judge, evidence should be his basis of decisions, not his political bias. This doesn't just affect the judge either. Showing impartiality can cause a loss of faith in the whole MA court system. He deserves to be reprimanded.

If that happened,then maybe

Ok, so you're going to ignore that it was the SJC that said this judge was out of line. Got it.

[deleted]

These are politicians… I don’t know why people think it is unlikely that Biden has some connection to China. Even if it isn’t meaningful. I voted for Jill Stein who had connections to Russia. Trump had connections to Russia. A judge couldn’t remark about Trump’s possible connection to Putin? Why??

This is purely political. The townies here hate anything that resembles conservative thought.

>A judge’s very mild personal opinion about Joe Biden and China has absolutely nothing to do with their job.

I hardly think accusing POTUS of treason is "mild". And spreading unproven conspiracies shows a lack of critical thinking and judgement skills needed for his position. Especially since he's reciting Trump's exact words in some of his posts. Whether it affects his job or not will be determined by his decisions. We have seen out of Texas that biased political affiliation can in fact affect a judge's decisions though. At the very least, he can be 100% fair and impartial in every decision he makes, but his posts show he has a political bias and will leave doubt in a lot of people's minds.