After_Hovercraft7822 t1_ixwl1eo wrote
Reply to comment by WeDriftEternal in Why are many animated movies rated PG for things that would be considered Y7 on TV? by sgavary
I’m not sure what you’re trying to say. How are ratings “vanity plates”? How are they ineffective?
They’re ratings. They tell the viewer what type of content to expect so they can judge if it’s appropriate. That’s what ratings are for. They’re as functional as any other label.
In the 90s, the FCC absolutely wanted to get involved, off the heels of Tipper Gore’s (she was the Vice First Lady, which held more of a cultural tone-setter role here in the US up until the mid-00s) efforts to “protect the children”. The US has long history of government agencies and law enforcement enforcing “decency” laws and ordinances over film, TV, radio, and music. In almost every medium (except arguably radio), an advocacy group was formed, pooled their influence, pushed back, and ended up forming a voluntary ratings board (ESRB, MPAA, parental advisory labels, etc etc).
WeDriftEternal t1_ixwlfuk wrote
No, TV ratings are just fake there to make it seem like they exist. They are not real. Its a vanity plate, its not like actual real or has effect, outside of some carriage deals, which I have to assume at this point you don't know what content covenants and such are.
The FCC was never going to get involved. Never. The networks made a fake "ratings" system just to get the religious folks off their ass, it was all fake situation to shut people up. The networks knew it, the FCC did, the religious people knew it. Smoke and mirrors. It was "ok, if we just fake it will everyone shut up? Yeah? Ok"
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments