Recent comments in /f/movies

Muffinman908 t1_j6ex97z wrote

The directors cut is the worse version, no question, particularly for a first time viewer. In addition to messing up the pacing of the theatrical cut, it feels the need to spoil all of the ambiguity and mystery of the film by over-explaining all of the metaphysics/supernatural elements.

27

SLAB_ROCKGROIN t1_j6ex5k4 wrote

I kinda loathe them too. Most of them are very lazy as horror movies. Quite often they tried to hide the poor quality of the film by making it found footage and I mean in the sense that it feels unnecessary and tacked on just to hide the badness of it. I understand they are often low budget and thats fine but it doesnt make them any better and you can do wonders with a low budget, even as so simply that you have a fresh take on it but most of them are very cookie cutter average.

3

Just2epical OP t1_j6ex0a4 wrote

Ohhh yeah I thought that was odd that they basically explained it but yeah, also I saw alot of hype for the soundtrack but can't say I noticed anything great? Appreciate u answering tho I honestly was so confused watching the movie expecting something better

3

heybigbuddy t1_j6ewzhl wrote

There a handful a find okay, and for me it comes down to this: there has to be a good reason why the story is being told this way. For instance, if the story is told through a handheld camera that’s running for the whole film (like, say, Cloverfield), there has to be a good rationale for that. Most films that use these trips don’t seem to consider them at all, sort of how sitcoms started adopting The Office-style framing. A movie like [REC] comes to mind as doing this successfully, because the characters are reporters and film as much as they can because they think they might expose something suspicious or hidden. Almost every other time, though, it’s just wanting to use shaky cams and limited perspective and security footage regardless of what might be best or most effective.

3

SvJosip1996 t1_j6ew2td wrote

A Tale of two Kitties

It bore no resemblance to the Charles Dickens novel of the same name and was actually closer to Mark Twain’s The Prince and the Pauper. Movie couldn’t even get the source material right 😂

I have positive memories of watching it with my neighborhood friends as a kid … but then again I also said The Phantom Menace was my favorite movie around the same time period.

2

michael_corleone111 t1_j6evyvi wrote

On a related note..

I've always found it hard to pick between a 5-point scale and a a 10-point scale.

A 5-point scale makes it easier to rate movies, but it also makes it harder to distinguish between them as each point covers a wider range of quality. A 10-point scale, while being more precise, makes it harder to decide what to rate a movie.

3

Samael13 t1_j6evo6p wrote

The theatrical cut is way better than the Director's Cut of Donnie Darko; some of the extra scenes should have been included as extras on the discs, but the director's cut really messes up the pacing and flow, has a worse soundtrack, imo.

12