Recent comments in /f/movies

BatmanMK1989 OP t1_j6i5wgk wrote

The relationship with JD and Turk. The amazingness of Cox. The guest stars. Never a huge Elliot fan, but this show is fantastic. Opinion of course. Not every show is for everyone. This was one of the last network comedies that was truly exceptional, IMO.

6

EdgerQuintero t1_j6i5pua wrote

My best friend works in the industry, in front of the camera. Saw him in October. He was and does work on major TV shows and movies. Asked him in 30 years of doing this professionally who was the worst to work with, and he said without hesitation. Zack Braff. I said no way, and he said he's acts like an entitled a hole and pretentious as hell. And I thought of 6 or 7 folks before I asked the question.

However, I still love Scrubs and Garden State, but it does make me look at a few scenes with a little more scrutiny.

2

SadUSee OP t1_j6i57eo wrote

Reply to comment by ShroomingMantis in Avatar: the talk by SadUSee

Thanks bro, may you be surrounded by others who support you just as well.

-edit: you guys have been a fantastic mob. I couldn't have asked for a more surely sack of anti intellectualism dogpiled with angst and ignorance. You keep watching but not understanding film, and I'll keep on giggling at the wrong parts. Keep the sudsy, slippy, movie industry alive with the charity of the cutting edge of your wit.

-edit: some of of the dumbest comments here are from my alts. Can you.vote only for the real ones? Hint, I said the stupidest things.

Hmmm

1

Grizzhead86 t1_j6i48zg wrote

Zach Braff is a genius. Wish I was here was also a really really good film. Existential crises all over his films. You can tell he really has some depth to him and has a great feel for writing. His dialogue and pacing is top notch. I think an underrated filmmaker for sure.

An aside: sucks he go so much plastic surgery I saw him a year or so ago and was like ouch!

0

MartinScorsese t1_j6i3qv0 wrote

> Just because you can give a name to a character trope doesn't mean the whole surrounding film is bad as a result.

Well, yes, except this film is entirely about one man's growth - with a young woman as the primary catalyst for it - and when said catalyst is unrealistic, then the whole endeavor rings false.

> using subtleties and symbolism

There's nothing subtle in Garden State.

> The overall result is still a good film that can elicit emotion.

Bad movies can still be manipulative.

0

rxneutrino t1_j6i30cx wrote

I do see this perspective, but I have a different take on it. Just because you can give a name to a character trope doesn't mean the whole surrounding film is bad as a result. Garden State cleverly depicts the transition into adulthood using subtleties and symbolism, even if some of the characters are cartoonish and unrealistic. This doesn't just apply to Portman's character. The overall result is still a good film that can elicit emotion.

9