Recent comments in /f/movies
SneezingRickshaw t1_j6nrr9v wrote
Reply to comment by Nick_The_Knight_ in Why Film Festivals Are Steering Clear of Controversial Movies by BobRobot77
Neither of those sentences are related to something I said. You should reread my comment.
What makes the McCarthy era different is not the target. I’m not talking about the target. I’m talking about the severity of the censorship and that State censorship is so much worse than simple public pressure.
And I didn’t call you anti-mask. I’m saying you’re exaggerating what’s happening now (or downplaying what happened then) because you’re comparing it to something incomparably worse. They’re not on the same level, you’re engaging in hyperbole.
But if you have so much trouble understanding such a simple comment, I don’t know how much good my advice on reading more about McCarthy would do, you need to dramatically improve your reading comprehension skills before that. Friendly advice.
scottybomb t1_j6nrqcm wrote
Reply to Do You Think The D&D Movie Will Tank? by cpassmore79
Well, the D&D fan-base has started to get heavily into the actual play model, and I feel that's what they were going with here. With successes like "Critical Role" and the like, you can do original characters in a familiar "D&D" setting, and the fans will buy in. They're your core demographic - and if they like the movie, that could start to draw in other genre fans.
That said, the movie isn't going to perform well because the company which owns the IP just did something which alienated their entire fan-base months prior to the release.
Zachariot88 t1_j6nrnvd wrote
Reply to comment by tinoynk in What tv series would have worked better as a film? by antonimbus
Westworld previously WAS two movies.
UnderwoodsNipple t1_j6nrlzh wrote
Reply to comment by Dottsterisk in The Flaw in Dutch’s Predator (1987) Trap by [deleted]
Yes I've seen the scene, I literally just described it. You're also just repeating what I said. I know he disguised the spikes, I know he's trying to get it to move down the path in a very obvious manner. That doesn't negate what I said, it really just supports it. The way the Predator notices the spikes, it would have had to seriously crouch down to be unaware of this trap. And it gives Dutch a cocky 'I know what you're doing' look before it walks around.
Point being, the original trap is extremely obvious and Dutch is being extremely obvious in wanting the Predator to move down that path.
Dutch doesn't move, he doesn't panic, he seems to know exactly what's gonna happen and he waits for the Predator to get into place, making sure it's underneath and then kicks off the trap. Your counter suggestion seems to be that he just got extremely lucky that he placed his counterweight exactly in the spot the Predator ended up moving to by circumventing the original trap.
I'll concede that there's an original trap he would have sprung if the Predator had kept going but I'm sorry I'm not buying this idea that Dutch is surprised and caught off guard when it doesn't fall for the original trap. The whole idea here is 'You thought you were the top hunter, but I outsmarted you!'.
You might be confusing the scene being shot to heighten tension for the audience with Dutch just getting lucky because at the end of the day, we the audience are meant to think "oh shit, what is he gonna do now?".
JohnnyQuestions36 t1_j6nrldw wrote
That new show the Patient
Zachariot88 t1_j6nrgd3 wrote
Reply to comment by antonimbus in What tv series would have worked better as a film? by antonimbus
The most baffling part of that show is that they set up a very emotional scene with Bucky and his neighbor for his atonement arc, then don't show us. So... we needed to see Anthony Mackie apply for bank loans and fix a boat, but not see a man find out >!his friend murdered his son!<? What?!
NoSirI_DontLikeIt t1_j6nrezq wrote
Reply to Do You Think The D&D Movie Will Tank? by cpassmore79
I wouldn't be surprised.
cpassmore79 OP t1_j6nrak1 wrote
Reply to comment by stumpdawg in Do You Think The D&D Movie Will Tank? by cpassmore79
In terms of writing female characters, Danica was ahead of her time. Focused, driven, doing her own thing. Not following Cadderly around fawning over him. She's great.
chadisdangerous t1_j6nr33i wrote
Reply to Do You Think The D&D Movie Will Tank? by cpassmore79
That movie has bomb written all over it
Greedy-Creme-995 t1_j6nr2we wrote
Reply to comment by Greedy-Creme-995 in Do You Think The D&D Movie Will Tank? by cpassmore79
Yes big flop
Dark-Myst t1_j6nr2d4 wrote
Reply to comment by G-bone714 in The last hour of Cast Away is devastating and beautiful by PastMiddleAge
No, it's her dentist. No more behind his back than a regular checkup.
stumpdawg t1_j6nqxw7 wrote
Reply to Do You Think The D&D Movie Will Tank? by cpassmore79
I'd love a cleric quintet movie or show
Greedy-Creme-995 t1_j6nqx4q wrote
Reply to Do You Think The D&D Movie Will Tank? by cpassmore79
Yes
_jollyearlyjazz_ t1_j6nqnfy wrote
Reply to Has anyone ever seen a dream sequence that actually depicted a dream accurately? by Jordie1010
There is a Joel Haver video that does an awesome representation of a dream
Beethovens_Stool t1_j6nqlfo wrote
ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT FILMS OF ALL TIME
smenti t1_j6nql8w wrote
Reply to comment by ThrowThrow117 in The last hour of Cast Away is devastating and beautiful by PastMiddleAge
Small steps man. You got this.
[deleted] OP t1_j6nqdbg wrote
Reply to comment by lucia-pacciola in Is the Wikipedia for Silence of the Lambs wrong? by [deleted]
[deleted]
DanontheMoon t1_j6nq774 wrote
Reply to comment by Streets-Ahead- in What tv series would have worked better as a film? by antonimbus
That's the exception 👍
PuzzleheadShine t1_j6nq6xi wrote
Reply to comment by Choice-Valuable313 in Is the Wikipedia for Silence of the Lambs wrong? by [deleted]
For sure, I certainly wouldn't want to suggest Wikipedia is infallible, I just felt the original commenters remarks a little unfair. Totally agree with you!
Nord4Ever t1_j6nq2bx wrote
Reply to Best "American in Asia" movies? by Ebbemonster
Last Samurai
Agamemnon420XD t1_j6nq23g wrote
Reply to comment by ethanwnelson in Taxi Driver influence on Drive by swxtchblade3
To be fair, Taxi Driver is an odd movie. It’s hard to like Travis Bickle, but truth be told the movie is EXTREMELY cool, like the cinematography is just epic, like the driving scenes and the scenes with the guns, and Travis’ plight is relatable but he is also clearly lost his mind, though hopefully he regained it after killing those shitty pimps and getting Iris home safely. Honestly I just love the speeches in the movie, like his speech, where he’s like fumbling over his words and trying to sound cool; ‘Listen up you cocksuckers, here is a man who would not stand for it any longer.’ Or like Palantine’s speech where he’s just like, ‘WE are the people. We’re tired of this. We demand change. No longer will the few control the many.’ Like it’s such a cookie-cut joke of a political speech, it’s hilarious, in a morbid way. Scorsese is really a genius.
Manu442 t1_j6npyv7 wrote
Reply to comment by Nord4Ever in Pamela Anderson A Love Story by Totorose04
Uh yea, in the USA it's on Hulu... I think. In Canada, it's on Disney Plus
AnUnbeatableUsername t1_j6npwff wrote
I have to assume he was a better actor than his brother. It would be kind of impressive if he was worse.
mojito_sangria t1_j6npuuj wrote
Without the last hour, the movie would be a cliched adaptation of Robinson Crusoe.
With the last hour of Chuck’s emotional reunion with his (ex)wife and reintegration into the world, the movie is brought up to an instant classic
Longshot318 t1_j6nryhd wrote
Reply to comment by OldRestaurant7964 in What tv series would have worked better as a film? by antonimbus
I'm not sure that turning it into a movie is what would have improved it. Better direction and green screen would have been a start, no matter what format it was put out in.