Recent comments in /f/movies

Select_Action_6065 t1_j9bjwiv wrote

I hate to say it but he would need to work with a new crew. He has had the same editor his whole career. The same cinematographer for over two decades. And with few exceptions the same composer for all his movies.

They are all among the best in their fields which is why he works with them.

But to be truly innovative you have to push past your own comfort zone and beyond your limits.

Having said that I don’t think innovation is all that important. Authenticity is and he excels at that.

2

FoxOntheRun99 t1_j9bj6cw wrote

From what I read in interviews, a lot of filmmakers (current ones and younger ones) are just in awe with his grasp of filmmaking. His ability to block out and edit a scene in his head and be able to articulate it, technically and emotionally, on the spot. A lot of us would struggle to just keep up. He has a lot to offer, still.

2

LoveEffective1349 t1_j9bi9fk wrote

This fact is soo overlooked.

At 70.

After happy feet Struggling with weather and actors and studio meddling and finances…

Dude just waltzed in, slapped Hollywood in the face, said “no you idiots, like THIS!” dropped the mic and laughed all the way to fame fortune and glory.

That doesn’t happen

7

chadisdangerous t1_j9bi5ut wrote

I have to disagree, Spielberg was always as inconsistent as he is now. It's just that the highs were higher and those movies stood the test of time.

He made 1941 between Close Encounters and Raiders, he made Always the same year as Last Crusade, The Lost World the year before Saving Private Ryan, etc. And he's still making great movies now, it's just easier to dwell on crap like The BFG or Ready Player One because we're in the middle of it and not looking back 30-40 years.

5

MuNansen t1_j9bhwth wrote

He may be past the point of high innovation, but he can still put on an absolute clinic of cinematic craftsmanship. West Side Story showed that. Movie fans still have a lot to learn from the guy. I'd even compare it to Jordan's epoch with the Wizards. Yeah his physical gifts were lessened, and he didn't have a strong team, but you could almost learn more from him because it was ALL skill at that point.

1

NKevros t1_j9bh8is wrote

I have yet to see Fabelmans yet, but for me I think there's a significant difference from early Spielberg to today's Spielberg. Can't tell if it is just nostalgia glasses or what, but prior to 2000 you could pretty much swear by going to his movies and having a good time.

Within the past 20 years he's been very much hit or miss for me. Perhaps that's just because there have been so many other, better directors to come out that it has exposed that he's a "good" filmmaker and generally not an excellent one.

1

chadisdangerous t1_j9bh7o3 wrote

There aren't many filmmakers who make groundbreaking films in the first place, let alone someone who's in their 70s and is already one of the most transformative figures in the history of the industry. It's not so much a question of whether he can, it's a question of whether it's reasonable to expect him to do it again. It's probably asking too much.

That being said, though, I do think West Side Story and The Fabelmans are groundbreaking in the context of his own career. He had never made a musical before WSS and remaking an American classic is a tall order for anyone, and not only had he had never done a domestic drama as intimate as The Fabelmans but he had never made anything so nakedly personal.

So even if he isn't changing the industry he's finding new ways to make more personal films and that's exciting enough for me! And the fact that he's still making movies as good as WSS or Fabelmans is a blessing in and of itself.

3

[deleted] t1_j9bh3g2 wrote

Honestly, Spielberg came up career wise getting his start in the early 70s in an era that was coming up on the verge of innovation in film making. He finished the 70s with two big movies (Jaws and Close encounters) and a big flop (1941). Then of course, the 80s really were the decade of Spielberg as both director and producer. He also had some great things in the 90s, but it feels like he was more low-key during that period and also went a more historical and serious route.

1

IamMrEE t1_j9bgo56 wrote

I didn't watch but his last two are said to be great, it's the audience that is different where they do not see the appeal, today we have another mindset... Back then at the peak of movie making era a movie like Everything Everywhere, all at once might've just been an obscure independent movie or a flop.

The old school story format doesn't appeal so much... But Top Gun proved some things are still doable.

He just needs to find something that will appeal to today's public and generation, which is more demanding because they have everything tenfold in several mediums, movies, podcast, TV shows, skits, docu, reality TV, social network, streaming, etc...

2