Recent comments in /f/movies

kiwi-66 t1_j9is3rc wrote

SPOILER ALERT:

Gladiator is literally a remake of a 1964 epic called The Fall of the Roman Empire.

Anyway, both movies take lots of liberties with the facts. The central plot is one example. In both movies, Commodus has a rivalry with Livius/Maximus and ends up duelling him to the death (this didn't happen in real life). Also, the rival has a romance with Lucilla (Commodus' sister) which is also fiction.

Nevertheless, both movies are worth a watch if you're not that interested about historical accuracy and just want a decent movie.

1

h00n23 t1_j9irrnq wrote

I am Asian not even white why are you assuming my race? Thank you is my english good enough to sound like white American .

Most people here don't want to watch lgb shows or movie. I am just telling you truth. Nothing else what is my mistake if truth is bitter for you? Do you want me to lie? Lgbq is very big minority even in USA. I have family there lol

If you want to do huge business then you need to make something that conservative also enjoy. In many Asian countries conservative are majority. And big percentage of USA

I am seeing American media becoming less popular everyday in my and other Asian countries because of wokism.i myself mostly watch Asian media these days I don't care about race of actor as long they're attractive and good actor. Zendaya is brown and i like her she is cute.

1

Auran82 t1_j9iqjr8 wrote

In my opinion, the plot is too complex for a kids movie, but the actual writing is way too toddler level for most adults to enjoy. Most of the time the resolution for any issues they came across (that were almost always caused by someone doing something dumb) were basically Paw Patrol level.

And I mean seriously, if Andy had watched that movie Woody would have been riding around on a Sox the Cat toy.

3

AloneCan9661 t1_j9iqeua wrote

You know what I mean and your violent reaction shows that you wouldn’t even listen to anything I had to say.

Two women kissing, let alone people kissing shouldn’t be in a movie geared for kids…Disney has gone all out on this and their results have proved to be disastrous.

−1

securitywyrm t1_j9iq6bh wrote

A thought for a better movie

It's a movie about the actors FILMING the movie of Buzz Lightyear, a kinda stock childrens cartoon fare of the 80s. However the Buzz actor is a "method actor" and gets too much of an ego, tensions flare, and people have to pull together and have some heart to heart moments to get the movie finished, "because it's not about us, it's about the kids who will be inspired by it."

And then after-credits scene of adult Andy working at NASA

2

Thrug t1_j9ipyh8 wrote

> It's not the audiences' fault for not understanding the movie. It's Pixar's fault for not understanding their own character.

This reeks of "do you guys not have phones" arrogance. Sad to see Pixar go the way of Blizzard, but with this attitude it's almost guaranteed they won't recover.

2

longshot24fps t1_j9ipqt4 wrote

Better for them to have done this as a standalone movie with a new character at a lower budget. I Ben if it failed, they would have lost a lot less $$ and not punched a hole in their Toy Story franchise.

“We asked too much of the audience” reeks of condescension: it’s not our fault you didn’t want to buy tickets to our movie. Toy story is the gold standard of Pixar and Disney animated franchises. Lightyear was an ok movie, but they chose to cut ties with Buzz Lightyear, a character they’d spent decades building. For a beloved animated character, altering the look and replacing the voice is guaranteed to throw an audience. Nothing against Chris Evans, but imagine replacing Tom Hanks with him for Woody with similar changes. It’s just not Woody any more. Yes, Pixar says this is the movie Andy watched, but they’re not fooling anyone.

Pixar has made some of the best animated films ever. I hope they get their mojo back.

1

boot2skull t1_j9ipfgd wrote

I think you can have the serious Buzz or source material Buzz, but it had to be first, not the other way around. We love toy Buzz. We want toy Buzz. We want Buzz and Woody together. I don’t think we’re interested in source material Buzz now that we’ve had Toy Buzz. Besides, did Lightyear even match the tone of what we imagine the source material to be like to create a toy like Buzz?

Seems like a Star Wars problem, where you let the IP live in our heads too long, then add to it. You are going to have to be perfect to make most of the fans happy, and even then, not everyone will be happy. You can gauge how old a person is by how offended they are by each trilogy.

3