Recent comments in /f/newhampshire

Lucky_Device3182 t1_j29k9ry wrote

That is literally what the post did. Everyone has more or less agreed on the basic understanding of gender until the last decade… if I said I am looking for only straight men to work? You would 100% believe that is discriminatory. Get down off the SJW high horse and try and see what other people are say.

12

utopianbears t1_j29k5cw wrote

Continuing to prove my point that you guys don’t seem to understand BASIC systemic issues around gender/sex. On the most entry level understanding we can agree women/LGBTQIA are a small ratio of workers in this industry, by supporting their work we are not discriminating against you. 💀💀💀

−4

utopianbears t1_j29iyrw wrote

Had to look up SJW ya’ll will really try to sidestep facts and misdirect any conversation with buzzwords - instead of being afraid of trans people LOL maybe understand your fear/anger is a product of a sheltered existence and you just haven’t met many to have a real world understanding. Maybe go outside instead of digesting conservative clickbait and let people live their lives without politicizing /perpetuating inaccurate violent stereotypes onto them.

3

Lucky_Device3182 t1_j29hgqj wrote

If I said “I’m looking for contractors that are only straight because LGBTQ+ people making me uncomfortable”. People would lose their mind lol… the issue is exclusionary language. Some people don’t like to be judged based on immutable characteristics such as their sexual orientation or gender.

17

occasional_cynic t1_j29fk1u wrote

'real safety concerns' = things I agree with.

'ignorance' = things I do not agree with.

> maybe spend some time looking at statistics of men who commit sexual assault versus a trans person

Crime statistics (especially with perpetrators) actually do not factor in gender identity at all, but your continued ignorance will be well received on Reddit as long as it it complies with what all the other SJW's want to hear.

6

utopianbears t1_j29exgs wrote

lol yes let’s definitely compare ignorance with real safety concerns, great job 👍🏼 also literally google is free - maybe spend some time looking at statistics of men who commit sexual assault versus a trans person. In actuality, trans people are at way higher risk of being attacked or murdered but please continue this dangerous narrative with no statistical backing - so embarrassing.

−1

Dank_Turtle t1_j29ag7l wrote

What a wild comment section. I think the thing the angry people are failing to miss, which always happens, is that people in marginalized groups support each other, because who else is going to? This isn't about excluding, this is about specifically wanting to include and support their own. Non marginalized groups don't have a reason to do that, they're already openly accepted anywhere without it even having to be a thought and that's what the people outwardly seeking to support their group are looking to do.

All these angry comments come from a place where they feel excluded, holy shit maybe you kinda understand how OP feels

12

Qbncgr t1_j299b2k wrote

Reply to comment by fire_drier in Tree Stand by RidingBeen

If you can’t access the entire perimeter of your property, you can post a portion of it. The “no hunting” can be the entire property or just certain parcels. This allows you to post certain areas, such as a pasture, dog walking area, or an area around house/barn.

You could also post “no hunting without permission”. This allows you to control access while still allowing hunting.

2