Recent comments in /f/newhampshire

hardsoft t1_jdm843j wrote

The transmission loses are pretty low and now you're talking about a lot more power conversation hardware.

You're not going directly from whatever voltage a panel array outputs to the car battery...

And I haven't seen these often in northern climates. They might make sense for small parking areas or only the perimeter of larger parking lots. Otherwise seems like they'd make snow removal a nightmare.

−1

TurretLauncher OP t1_jdm6vaa wrote

Did you even read my response? Keene Meadow Solar will use 240 acres “and avoid CO2 emissions equal to that sequestered by 88,000 acres of forest.” Hence the concern about “clearing forests that (ideally) serve as carbon sinks” is misplaced, as this project reduces CO2 emissions literally hundreds of times better than these 240 acres of cleared forest could.

0

sphennings t1_jdm68h5 wrote

Unless I see a modified plan from someone officially associated with the project this isn't relevant.

It also does nothing to address my concerns of destroying rural land to turn it into solar farms instead of converting unproductive urban and suburban strip malls and parking lots to a more productive use.

4

TurretLauncher OP t1_jdm5znn wrote

Parking canopies do provide extra benefits though. In addition to providing protection from sun, rain, etc., they can deliver power directly into parked electric vehicles. Having the power generated that close to the point of consumption eliminates all electricity transmission costs.

6

TurretLauncher OP t1_jdm5aa1 wrote

> The great thing about solar is that it can be put anywhere there's sun. I wish that would more often result in something other than rural land getting cleared in the name of environmentalism or progress.

With floating solar, no rural land would be cleared. Floating solar could be done at Goose Pond, which is very close to the planned location of Keene Meadow Solar. The primary downside is the higher installation cost for floating solar, though it would still be cost-effective.

2

piscatator t1_jdm42xt wrote

Would I prefer it if this project was not cutting down trees, absolutely. Ideally most large solar arrays in NH would be built in land that was already in “use”. However I also think about where our current power comes from and that is natural gas. Natural gas extraction can lead to contaminated water and is very carbon intensive. The same goes for oil. NH uses both but never has to deal with the environmental impact of these industries. Coal is even worse. If NH is going to start producing more of it’s own energy locally there will be some impact. Now the good thing about a solar project is that if it becomes obsolete in the future it can be disassembled and the land is not irreparably damaged. Today when you turn on your lights more than likely the power is coming from natural gas and sometimes coal. The communities where that gas and coal were extracted have been impacted by environmental damage that no one reading this will live long enough to see remediated.

7