Recent comments in /f/nottheonion
[deleted] t1_j4ep11k wrote
Reply to comment by BirdsbirdsBURDS in A woman is ordered to repay her employer for time theft by fartingfreddy1
[removed]
chernobyl169 t1_j4eote3 wrote
Reply to comment by MrLumpykins in A woman is ordered to repay her employer for time theft by fartingfreddy1
Welp, if you think time billing is fraud, good luck going after the lawyer that's charging you in hour increments for two-minute phone calls. Three short calls in half an hour? That's three billable hours. Whether you think it's fraud is irrelevant - the law does not, because the people that are in the business of law make a lot of money from that being the case.
"Time theft" only exists for employees. This is by design to protect wealth, like most laws regarding money. It's not fraud to bill for a made-up amount of time, it's literally how all time billing except for employee wages is done. Only "wage earners" are paid by the minute. Some employers actually calculate down to the six second interval (tenth of a minute). Meanwhile, the overnight parking garage gets to round up to the nearest four hour increment. Who's really "committing" anything here - the lady getting her job done quickly, or the folks claiming they overpaid after the job is done?
ElSapio t1_j4enpk7 wrote
Reply to comment by bubba7557 in A woman is ordered to repay her employer for time theft by fartingfreddy1
They only had her download it after she wasn’t doing her work.
Kittenscute t1_j4en5bh wrote
Reply to comment by omally_360 in Idaho Republican Apologizes for Comparing Women to Farm Animals by wallstreetegg
> I don’t believe the explanation is as simplistic as that, what a sad
narrow view you have, no wonder your country is so polarized as it is.
It really is, if you vote for bigots, you agree enough with their bigoted views. If you didn't agree with their bigoted views, you wouldn't vote for them.
This is a universal fact, and has nothing to do with America specifically.
> what a sad narrow view you have
What's sad is you unironically defend bigots. Also makes you a disgusting excuse of a human being btw.
epistemic_epee t1_j4elpv8 wrote
Reply to comment by johnsolomon in UK schools ban physical contact, prevent students from holding hands, hugging by phoenix0153
>So what, are these kids gonna get punished if they clap a buddy on the shoulder after winning a game or hug a friend when they're down? Sounds like they're just going to foster some really socially awkward teenagers
>Students are not allowed to touch each other whilst on site. The only exceptions will be in Performing Arts, sporting activities and PE lessons, when this is required. This will help to create a calm and orderly atmosphere and ensure that there is no confusion about play fighting or anything more serious.
While the internet is largely against the policy, the parents seem to be really for it. I'm somewhat curious what led up to this.
TupperCoLLC t1_j4elp10 wrote
Reply to comment by beaucoupBothans in Paul Ryan says he 'had too much power' as House speaker by bomberesque1
I’ve read it like 3 times and I still don’t get it
Programmdude t1_j4ekk18 wrote
Reply to comment by Ordarne in A woman is ordered to repay her employer for time theft by fartingfreddy1
I think productivity monitoring is bullshit. I'll agree it's nice in theory, but it's usually impossible to pull off in a fair or mostly fair way.
I'm a software developer, and I can spend a day going off in a direction that ends up being useless. Some jobs look easy but end up being very difficult and vice versa.
A friend does something to do with approving loans. Some clients are simply more difficult and complicated than others, in ways that can't be predicted by performance measuring software.
To be honest, I think the only jobs where it can work are those that have someone doing something identical in a repetitive manner, though robots have replaced most of those, or jobs that are small enough that you can mostly fit the time required to a simple equation, such as those that pack groceries for delivery.
ElectricMan324 t1_j4ek0mw wrote
Reply to comment by poboy212 in Paul Ryan says he 'had too much power' as House speaker by bomberesque1
They both literally said that they "compromised" with the lunatic fringe of the party in order to keep them under control, in their opinion. Remember Michelle Bachmann? Old Boehner said that he knew she was nuts but tried to work with her because he was afraid of her growing power.
If they had acted differently and worked with Dems to box in the crazies when they were a minority, maybe things would have turned out differently. People like Ryan and Boehner were worse than the tea party/MAGA people in my opinion. They KNEW there was a problem but decided that the party was more important than the country.
That decision directly led us down the crazy train to Trump and 1/6.
bigbangbilly t1_j4ejkh7 wrote
Reply to comment by Mr_Vacant in His excellency Rollan Roberts II announces his bid for President of the United States by JawaPunter
>uniform says he's from the Ohio State University Marching Band
I though the name make him sound like European royalty
printers_rock t1_j4ej9r1 wrote
Reply to comment by teplightyear in Paul Ryan says he 'had too much power' as House speaker by bomberesque1
Well if we give a shit at all about being right specifically, not just generally... Deficit by year:
| Year | Deficit (in Billions) |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 585 |
| 2017 | 665 |
| 2018 | 779 |
Accuracy matters, otherwise you're not helping. You're one of those people where a lot of us end up in a position of "I agree with your overall point but I fucking hate the way you made it"
Not a good person to be, imo.
A better version of that general argument would be to simply ask why deficits rose during his speakership. Should also lump in 2015 at $442B and 2019 at $984B, to make the point even more obvious. You could, of course, make a very concrete form of that argument by laying out the premises that he is both a fiscal conservative as well as acknowledges directly himself that he wielded a tremendous amount of power. But we're not exactly interviewing him, so that's a bit unnecesary.
bhollis6895 t1_j4eiww7 wrote
Reply to comment by passwordsarehard_3 in Paul Ryan says he 'had too much power' as House speaker by bomberesque1
“Democrats vote with their hearts” don’t let any of these politicians fool you.
rugbat t1_j4ehg2k wrote
Nice cock, but, yes, inconsiderate neighbours.
haahaahaa t1_j4ehewt wrote
Reply to comment by psilocin72 in A woman is ordered to repay her employer for time theft by fartingfreddy1
This was in Canada, it's the second word in the article.
JackPThatsMe t1_j4egi92 wrote
Reply to UK schools ban physical contact, prevent students from holding hands, hugging by phoenix0153
But honestly considering how British people are with physical intimacy and showing emotion how much of a problem was this or would it ever be?
furrylandseal t1_j4efo9m wrote
Reply to comment by SgtMajMythic in Idaho Republican Apologizes for Comparing Women to Farm Animals by wallstreetegg
I’m sorry that you feel threatened by women who demand to be treated as equally valuable humans. The good news is that insecurity is a treatable condition.
colbat45 t1_j4ef2m5 wrote
It’s Missouri. Is anyone actually surprised?
ConstantlySlippery t1_j4eewwi wrote
See the thing is animals only reproduce when they have the extra energy and drive to do so. The point here is, the sea dragons are happy enough to mate in captivity, and that is the point.
DltaDFoxtrot t1_j4eesl6 wrote
Reply to comment by BirdsbirdsBURDS in A woman is ordered to repay her employer for time theft by fartingfreddy1
Okay most companies are okay with paid smoke breaks and shitting. This woman had to do something egregious to have the company tell her to pay em. Most companies wouldn't go so hard if it wasn't that serious.
If I had an employee dicking around while they should be working and I was paying em I'd be pissed. Wouldn't you?
The-friar t1_j4eeeot wrote
Reply to comment by thinkstohimself in Paul Ryan says he 'had too much power' as House speaker by bomberesque1
Also paying representatives the minimum wage is a good way to ensure that only the very wealthy can afford to run and hold office
Easy-Concentrate2636 t1_j4ed9ix wrote
Reply to comment by Llenette1 in Paul Ryan says he 'had too much power' as House speaker by bomberesque1
It’s wild how much saner old GOP seems in comparison.
BirdsbirdsBURDS t1_j4ecy75 wrote
Reply to comment by DltaDFoxtrot in A woman is ordered to repay her employer for time theft by fartingfreddy1
Ok. Make sure you punch out for every bathroom break, every personal conversation, and smoke break if you take them, and you better not work slow.
Look. If she actually just sat around and did nothing for hours on end, then yeah she should get in trouble. But the fact that they don’t mention a timeframe makes seem as if she sat for a week without working at all, when we’ve all been guilty of wasting time on the clock, and in the strictest sense, that’s stealing time. But I’ve also done favors for and helped people without being on the clock after being asked to do so, and that is on me, but for other people they are required to do work off the clock and that’s wage theft.
So you can sit here and sniff this companies taint if you want, but I don’t feel bad for them. If she truly stole time, then she got caught; I just hope that we eventually start catching more companies that are stealing time from its employees.
DltaDFoxtrot t1_j4ebnwy wrote
Reply to comment by BirdsbirdsBURDS in A woman is ordered to repay her employer for time theft by fartingfreddy1
How about she shouldn't steal time in the first place?
Eddiebaby7 t1_j4eblxh wrote
Reply to comment by EaterOfFood in Paul Ryan says he 'had too much power' as House speaker by bomberesque1
Actually yes. He was the last Republican House Speaker who believed in a functional government and had no problems working across the aisle to keep the country going. His ouster signaled the end of the Republican belief in compromise, the beginning of GOP obstruction for obstructions sake, and a steady stream of incoming performative lunatics.
thinkstohimself t1_j4ebivf wrote
Reply to comment by sealmeal21 in Paul Ryan says he 'had too much power' as House speaker by bomberesque1
1 term max? So basically you want the government to be even more ineffectual?
[deleted] t1_j4eq146 wrote
Reply to comment by snewz404 in Paul Ryan says he 'had too much power' as House speaker by bomberesque1
[deleted]