Recent comments in /f/nottheonion

roscid t1_j7mqi78 wrote

> Rowling is not exactly reticent about her opinions. If she hated Jews she'd have said so straight out.

Probably not, though. Most people, even bigots, understand that expressing outright antisemitism is socially unacceptable. Clearly we aren't there with transphobia yet, because she can say what she says and still have people defend her "right to her opinion."

Many people don't understand trans issues, and therefore see them as up for debate rather than being a human rights issue. I don't necessarily blame them for being ignorant considering the vast amount misinformation out there, but it does give JKR a lot more leeway to be openly transphobic compared to being openly antisemitic, racist, sexist, etc.

(Please note that I'm not debating whether or not she is antisemitic, I haven't examined the claims or the evidence either way. I am simply offering a counterpoint to the specific part of your comment that I quoted.)

0

froggythefish t1_j7mpwem wrote

Just because something bad already existed doesn’t mean it isn’t bad to perpetuate it. Instead of letting Jewish stereotypes die out, the game devs are including them and thus sustaining them. The fact the stereotypes already existed isn’t an excuse. Gamers need to start playing good video games anyway, like the hidden indie gem “Otoko Cross: Pretty Boys Mahjong Solitaire”

−8

roscid t1_j7movkm wrote

Framing it as a mere difference of opinion makes light of the suffering of the people she is actively working to dehumanize. I don’t think opinions that dehumanize others are worthy of respect or consideration, and speaking out against them, even in an “uncivil” manner, is fully called for.

−5