Recent comments in /f/nottheonion
rikdagimp t1_j85m267 wrote
This is why America is fucked
OhTheHueManatee t1_j85kw5r wrote
This shit is so fucked up. Your religious freedoms don't mean you can victimize people.
HolycommentMattman t1_j85keuj wrote
Reply to comment by shalafi71 in Wyoming limiting child marriage sparks Republican outrage by zdzimmer987
Or rather, the repealing of the 26th amendment. Which is still just as difficult as adding a new one. 2/3rds of Congress (each chamber), or 2/3rds of state legislatures. It's not going to happen.
Ecthelion2187 t1_j85kcos wrote
Who's groomin' who again?
cosmernaut420 t1_j85jnjr wrote
Republicans: unironically endorsing child marriages if it will net them votes.
"Remember, it's not pedophilia if the parents are OK with it!" - Republicans, probably
Soggy_Midnight980 t1_j85ixpw wrote
Missouri politicians crawling over each other for NRA points.
RaptorPrime t1_j85gzp1 wrote
Reply to comment by hatersaurusrex in Missouri votes against banning children from carrying guns in public by VidE27
this is exactly what I'm talking about. there's no reason a police officer can't confiscate an illegally obtained weapon upon discovery. A kid with a 9mm in his pocket or carrying a long gun in a completely inappropriate setting, who is detained by police, already is losing that gun. This new law would do nothing to empower that capability and only serves to harm individuals who may have been doing nothing but trying to look after themselves.
RaptorPrime t1_j85gfd9 wrote
Reply to comment by DinoHunter64 in Missouri votes against banning children from carrying guns in public by VidE27
No i need someone to explain to me the actual backing for this bill that only labels children as criminals. Like, the guns are there. People already own them, this law changes nothing about that. All this law would do, again, is label children as criminals. Why is this necessary. There's no way for children to legally obtain weapons without an adult. There's no reason why a police officer can't already confiscate an illegally obtained weapon. So please, explain, what would this law actually accomplish?
ZachMN t1_j85fwcb wrote
Just what you’d expect from Groomy Ol’ Pedophiles.
hatersaurusrex t1_j85eqmo wrote
Reply to comment by RaptorPrime in Missouri votes against banning children from carrying guns in public by VidE27
The whole thing is confusing. This quote:
>A Democrat, Donna Baringer, said police in her district asked for the change to stop “14-year-olds walking down the middle of the street in the city of St Louis carrying AR-15s”.
seems to imply that St. Louis is a lawless wasteland where juvenile warlords brazenly and openly carry semiautomatic rifles in broad daylight so often that police are begging lawmakers to do something about it.
But I can't find any evidence of that happening outside this lady's quote.
Meanwhile, back in reality, teenagers hunting on public land with an old Henry .22 can easily wind up with a police record all because somebody in the state capitol decided to grandstand in order to solve a problem that probably doesn't exist.
Kaasbroodje072 t1_j85e7no wrote
Reply to comment by Hugh-Dingus in How did Spain spend €258 million on trains that don't fit its tunnels? by ContributionWhole850
NS at least uses their trains. Arriva has been disappointing to say the least. strikes Evey other week it feels like nowadays.
DinoHunter64 t1_j85e4cq wrote
Reply to comment by RaptorPrime in Missouri votes against banning children from carrying guns in public by VidE27
Okay grandpa, back to bed.
RaptorPrime t1_j85bk21 wrote
Reply to comment by Dagonet_the_Motley in Missouri votes against banning children from carrying guns in public by VidE27
In sorry what part of this law passing or not passing arms children??? Lol your gonna be kinda upset when you learn that I started hunting at 8 years old.
supercyberlurker t1_j85beii wrote
This would make the minimum age 16, which obviously the Republican pedophiles opposing this dislike.
RaptorPrime t1_j85b7vp wrote
Reply to comment by Undead_Necromancer in Missouri votes against banning children from carrying guns in public by VidE27
How does a child legally obtain the weapon without an adult? If the weapon is legal then the child probably has a legal reason to carry it. If the weapon was obtained illegally then there's no reason a police officer should t confiscate it immediately and permanently if they discover it. All this law would do is label children as criminals when they may have a personally valid reason to carry and have not yet hurt anyone. How do cops treat criminals in America? I don't want targets on kid's backs.
Chard069 t1_j85apn5 wrote
Reply to Armed man on ASU's Tempe campus was actually a student with a tripod, university says by Perhaps321
'Photographer' was one of my US Army jobs. I could sometimes be seen with a rifle-stock-mounted camera sporting a big, long telephoto lens. I'm somewhat surprised I wasn't shot for carrying a bazooka around the base.
[deleted] t1_j859l75 wrote
[deleted]
shalafi71 t1_j857ert wrote
Reply to comment by defusted in Wyoming limiting child marriage sparks Republican outrage by zdzimmer987
They're more than welcome to waste time and energy on the subject. Raising the voting age would require a constitutional amendment.
rustymacdonald t1_j856xyq wrote
A more accurate headline would be "Republicans defend the right to marry children." The use of the passive voice makes it sound like the issue here is the bill rather than the obvious bad actors who want to preserve their ability to harm children.
[deleted] t1_j856hy3 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Wyoming limiting child marriage sparks Republican outrage by zdzimmer987
Nevrmind.🤡
Dagonet_the_Motley t1_j856g2w wrote
Reply to comment by onyxblade42 in Missouri votes against banning children from carrying guns in public by VidE27
Me fail English? That's unpossible!
[deleted] t1_j856ebi wrote
Reply to comment by Tyflyers in Wyoming limiting child marriage sparks Republican outrage by zdzimmer987
Why does he skip sophmores?
JeepWranglerSport t1_j856dvn wrote
Reply to How did Spain spend €258 million on trains that don't fit its tunnels? by ContributionWhole850
It’s like a real short girl dating a really really tall big muscular guy. She should consider that a certain part might not fit or she might get broken in half.
[deleted] t1_j856des wrote
[deleted]
caucasoidape t1_j85n5zh wrote
Reply to comment by rustymacdonald in Wyoming limiting child marriage sparks Republican outrage by zdzimmer987
After all the pissing, and moaning over the institution of marriage, and secret society grooming.