Republicans in Missouri want children to have guns and Republicans in Wyoming want to marry the children.

Are we going back to the 1850s when children with guns got married and stole cattle? Feels like it. People been watching too many Westerns. Bonanza and Little House on the Prairie are not realistic.

Sorry, but your account is too new to post. Your account needs to be either 2 weeks old or have at least 250 combined link and comment karma. Don't modmail us about this, just wait it out or get more karma.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[removed]

For years I have been grasping for a meaningful explanation of modern conservative idealogy and its brazen hypocrisy. I think you have nailed it.

they he she ? I was agreeing with you.

I can't tell if you're agreeing with me or playing whataboutism. Maybe try fewer pronouns.

Can a political party have oppositional-defiant disorder? Is that still a thing?

In some places, yes. Many very rural areas have pretty lax gun laws. It isn't uncommon to take a kid hunting or target shooting. I don't know the laws about adult supervision, though.

Little boys with a doll? 'Massive problem!'

Little boys with a smith and wesson? 'Nothing more American!'

public land is in the middle of no where and applies to a hunting sense, im pretty sure it doesnt apply to towns and city limits

>Some of these “hormone blockers” have been known to be used for failing liver treatments

Viagra is a heart medication. It is fairly common in medicine for things to have multiple applications. This information alone doesn't prove any particular point.

Well, they would repeal it. If they made another amendment saying that the voting age was 21, that would mean there are two conflicting amendments. So the only way to get the voting age back to 21 would be to repeal the 26th amendment (or amend it) to get rid of the 18 year old voting age.

Either way, it's not happening. I'm sure Vietnam vets aren't on board with this as they're the reason the voting age was lowered.

Toronto built street cars that didn't fit platforms

Non-american here... Are you allowed to be in possession of a gun as a child at all?

This country is going to fcking dogs I tell ya. Where is common sense?

that's exactly the argument, same one they use to defend their celebrities

That's why they oppose abortion. If women abort where will they find child brides?

Don't you know? Grooming is only bad if it is done in secret. Doing it in full view of society? Play on. /s

Congrats on being just as shitty as this guy.

If he had only tipped… and checked his credit card statement. Any number of things could have alerted him to this quickly.

Replugicants sure like sticking their dicks in children.

So Long, and Thanks For All the Fish

If you are confused why the GQP oppose this (among many other apparently hypocritical views) let me make their goals very simple for you:

1. The in-group should be protected by the law but not bound by it.

2. The out-groups should be bound by the law but not protected by it.

3. Any law that increases in-group power and happiness or decreases out-group power and happiness is morally just and necessary for society to survive.

4. Any law that decreases ingroup power and happiness or increases out-group power and happiness is morally evil and will lead to societies downfall.

Thats literally it. Every time you see a supposed GQP hypocrisy just check those 4 points again and you will see there is no hypocrisy, just a widespread public misunderstanding of their goals.

You got me thinking. It's not really the same difference is it? Just the same effort. And you're right, this country couldn't pass an amendment making it illegal to eat orphans.

Rare win for my state.