Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

AutoModerator t1_iwpnswo wrote

Users often report submissions from this site and ask us to ban it for sensationalized articles. At /r/nyc, we oppose blanket banning any news source. Readers have a >responsibility to be skeptical, check sources and comment on any flaws. You can help improve this thread by linking to media that verifies or questions this article's claims. Your link could help readers better understand this issue. If you do find >evidence that this article or its title are false or misleading, contact the moderators who will review it.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

azspeedbullet t1_iwpo3cc wrote

why give the mta more money? they dont need it. audit the ceos and the big wigs. that is where all of the money goes to instead

40

El_Gato t1_iwpo3pu wrote

Ahh! Guess The NYpost is done with the “crime in the city, only Zeldin can save you” posts… and moved on to some good ole’ infrastructure clickbait fear mongering!!!

43

Understanding_Naive t1_iwppb2c wrote

How is this clickbait?

Edit: the MTA is a monopoly. Theyre trying to shake down the govt for our tax dollars or else theyre going to cut jobs and services. They claim ridership is down since COVID and for some reason they think taxpayers should foot the bill.

22

Grass8989 t1_iwpttr3 wrote

The MTA lost 150+ employees to Covid. They need to have conductors to keep the trains running. You have to pay overtime if they work more than 40 hours a week. The civil servants aren’t the problem.

31

pegs22 t1_iwpvdao wrote

Hasn’t there been at least two huge bailouts in the last 3 years of the MTA?

20

socialcommentary2000 t1_iwq7l2q wrote

This city still custom fabricates replacement parts for installed equipment who's original fabricators haven't existed for the better part of a century.

If the USA had an actual social contract and wasn't just a loosely associated group of assholes that happen to sit under the same legal system, we'd have modernized our marquee transit system in our Alpha World City ages ago.

Alas, we have shit culture so we get shit results.

5

TuckHolladay t1_iwq88f0 wrote

There is a ton of money in the city. Rich people are coddled in this country. Tax the rich.

−8

tuberosum t1_iwq8o5y wrote

> Theyre trying to shake down the govt for our tax dollars or else theyre going to cut jobs and services. They claim ridership is down since COVID and for some reason they think taxpayers should foot the bill.

Do you know what happens when you let people go and then need them back once ridership goes up?

You pay a shitload of overtime since plenty won't return. Great deal for us, pay out even more in overtime!

2

Bkgrouch t1_iwq9saa wrote

Lots of people not paying the fare I'm talking about people that would never do this before it's insane I wonder what changed? 🤔

5

Grass8989 t1_iwqahus wrote

Fare box revenue is a lot higher of a percentage than I thought it was. Imagine if we somehow had a system that made it impossible to jump the turnstile.

12

organizim t1_iwqarcg wrote

Remember when Cuomo visits a train yard that was supposed to have a bunch of people working OT and NOONE WAS THERE? They ain’t all bad but there’s a ton of folks getting OT and not showing up.

24

KaiDaiz t1_iwqjtpy wrote

MTA do have a lot of fat that needs trimming. No reason why we are staffing stations with token booth workers and paying them OT for under capacity stations last 2 yrs during a pandemic. Axing that one segment of obsolete job will save MTA 100s of millions that will allow us to build a new 2nd Ave station every few yrs. I rather have new stations vs a token booth worker whos always sleeping on the job that all should have been axe a decade ago.

6

Grass8989 t1_iwqsqt3 wrote

I don’t think a new second ave subway station is going to be on the top of their of spending list. It cost $2.7 billion per mile for the last segment. Also, these are union jobs, you can’t just fire them.

5

FlamingoOutrageous15 t1_iwrub0p wrote

All our roads and some of our bridges rely entirely on tax revenue to function. Why is that infrastructure different from supporting the MTA with tax revenue, especially since way more people can be moved with an upgraded train system versus a highway? NYC is also a part of NY State, over half of the states population lives in the NYC metro area, of course there should be state support.

12

TeamMisha t1_iws5amd wrote

> audit the ceos and the big wigs

No lmao google "LIRR overtime king", there are/were employees literally making more than the CEO and board members for abusing OT policies. Biometric time keeping is helping now but there are still a lot of make work jobs around on contracts and because so many staff were let go during pandemic it's taking overtime by remaining staff to fill the gap due to the time delay in training new drivers

14

TeamMisha t1_iws5jtw wrote

There's much to economize yes. Booth attendants and for example newer trains going DOO (driver operated only), one guy who does the driving and doors, but labor unions are too powerful

2

TeamMisha t1_iws5xau wrote

Agreed, it's a public service, it should not "have" to be 100% profitable and yes it should be kept in a good position via state revenue. It is a state agency, it's the governor's and senate's responsibility to keep it in good working order and to hold bad actors (i.e. inefficiency) accountable. Highways purely from a budget perspective lose billions, we toll few of our highways and still have unpaid bridges all around the city. The subway could lose billions too, but without it the city would crumble since you could not move the millions of workers around.

8

TeamMisha t1_iws6ngm wrote

Just for context, some of you who may say oh who cares, the MTA doesn't deserve more of our money they are so wasteful. You need to realize, if the money is not found, they will NOT fill the gap by economizing. They will cut service. Then, you may not be so happy waiting 20 minutes for your train instead of 10 and ask whether your complaining was worth it. We're really at a pivotal moment, yes ridership is down and some may say well adjust for ridership, that also means service cuts. Do we gimp service and make it even worse and lose even more riders? Or do we accept this is a public service, for the good of the city, and keep it funded and even try to improve it such as better weekend service to make more fare revenue? I do not disagree the MTA needs economizing, but the political and labor union reality is that service will be cut before anything else.

9

Shamrogu3 t1_iws9h3v wrote

They literally say this every year and In turn secure millions more just to raise MTA ticket prices again and again ASSHOLES!!!!

3

ADustedEwok t1_iws9z17 wrote

Mta is a public benefit Corp which can’t default on their debts. They can take on as much money and do whatever they want and just keep writing ious

2

b1argg t1_iwsax7v wrote

The MTA is destroying itself

8

mak1028summet t1_iwsihit wrote

Why would the cops risk their job and lives busting farebeaters when the system does not punish them at all and they are back doing it 3 hours after being arrested.

2

Powerpuffgirlsstan t1_iwt7as8 wrote

Why do we expect public transportation to operate at a profit when roads don’t operate at a profit. Because they’re both public goods, look at the bigger picture folks, if public transportation goes down everything will get shittier

3

TeamMisha t1_iwtgto6 wrote

Gonna have to disagree, maybe you live on a good line but for some of us on the N and R it's already bad and even worse on weekends, I ain't looking forward to potential 30+ minute headways for the N in Astoria on Saturday night lol. The overnight cuts in service could be brutal

7

bsanchey t1_iwu9fmx wrote

Anyone cheering this I’ll just remind you the MTA moves millions of people on a daily bases. If that dies they all have to move to cars. Add 5 million more cars to streets and highways. No one will get anywhere.

3

bsanchey t1_iwucjq2 wrote

The way the MTA was created was because originally each line and the busses and all that were managed by different entities. They were consolidated over time to create one unified transit agency. Theoretically you could break them up and you could have the city take over the subway. Technically NYC owns the tracks the MTA just rents them for nothing. So its possible.

Only questions are how to do that and not cut service. Once people give up on transit it’s hard to get them back.

3

kd10023 t1_iwyyirn wrote

The “tons of conductor and operator overtime” is legitimate … we actually have to out in the hours and actually work during our OT on the NYCT side. You guys are so ignorant I swear. I understand when you think MTA you simply think NYCT because you live in nyc. But the abuse is 90% of the time coming from the LIRR and Metro North. Your bus driver or train operator / train conductor is actually working for whatever OT they are getting paid.

We dont get the double pay , we aren’t even allowed to strike unlike the rail roads. Shit, check seethroughny, the salaries are public info. Top guys are always LIRR and MTA police by a long shot

0

jerrythekid t1_iwznp0t wrote

This is the dumbest shit pretending to be smart shit I have ever read on Reddit. MTA destroyed? 🤣🤣🤣 they can just get money from bridges and tunnels who mark up tolls by 1,000 percent by fines. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

0