Recent comments in /f/nyc

hereditydrift t1_ja8089u wrote

People like your father are inspirations to me. I have loved learning about some of the activists from the 50s and 60s that were pushing to uplift their communities. The push for community building, unionization, and uplifting the working class that was present in the US during the late 1800s and early/mid-1900s ran deep -- but has largely been ignored as a part of US history. Speeches by Fred Hampton and other leaders during the 50s/60s still bring me hope of what our cities can become.

7

ZweitenMal t1_ja7x64b wrote

I read the entire article, because i have a background in commercial real estate, construction, and architecture and the topic interests me.

They are business owners. If you have a business and your market disappears, too bad. That was a risk you ran. Your investment is no longer profitable, so convert the business into something that is profitable, or lose your money.

129

korpus01 t1_ja7umm3 wrote

I think the reference is that the property owners have many thoughts, even more desires, a million of ideas, and it seems time to mulch over them. Which is another way of saying chewing fat.

However, I would imagine when your money and investments are on the line, while it is prudent to concider all possibilities in order to make the best economic decision, some sort of decision is better than loosing value or potential revenue for every day that a decision is not reached.

In other words, measure twice or thrice, perhaps thirty times if needed, but cut once.

9

akmalhot t1_ja7tenr wrote

Hey, genius redditor who doesn't know the different between permits and leases knows more than prominent eminent domain lawyers !... Amazing

"Michael Rikon, an attorney whose law firm focuses on eminent domain — cases in which government takes or restricts private property — says said he agreed with MSG’s claim that it’s being singled out, given that MSG owns the property and has successfully operated it.

If the city denied the MSG permit, Rikon said, “Just compensation would be required."

1

NetQuarterLatte t1_ja7ss80 wrote

Wouldn’t that make it harder to win wage theft cases?

Criminal cases can be dropped for a lot of non-merit reasons and require a “beyond any reasonable doubt” burden of proof.

Civil cases only require preponderance of evidence and don’t have strict timelines (such as speedy trial) or onerous discovery requirements on the plaintiff side.

1