Recent comments in /f/nyc

TheAJx t1_ja8ecno wrote

Renovating the units is at least in part expensive due to zoning regulations, per the article. We should look for opportunities to remove these obstacles where they make sense. This reduces the cost of reno.

Bringing more apartments into the supply has a rent reducing effect.

Financial district was significantly cheaper than most of Manhattan up until a few years ago, despite the expense of renovating apartments down there.

5

ZweitenMal t1_ja8ddly wrote

That's pretty rich considering the real estate lobby is able to buy decisions that favor them all the time. The problem is these conversions will cost money and hurt their profits in the short term and they don't like that. They'd rather sit with easy excuses and write the temporarily money-losing properties off against their profitable ones.

9

tikihiki t1_ja8cvzu wrote

"Elijah Muhammad told the annual Savior's Day convention on February 26 that "Malcolm X got just what he preached," but denied any involvement with the murder.[58] "We didn't want to kill Malcolm and didn't try to kill him," Muhammad said, adding "We know such ignorant, foolish teachings would bring him to his own end." from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_Malcolm_X#:~:text=Elijah%20Muhammad%20told%20the%20annual,him%20to%20his%20own%20end.%22

Regardless of who is was actually responsible for the killing, this seems hugely insulting to put this on Malcolm X blvd.

I won't claim to be an expert on this. Is there context I'm missing? What does Malcolm X's family think of Elijah Muhammad?

1

iamnyc t1_ja8cium wrote

The FiDi ones that were converted had the floorplates to do so. I'm 100% certain that ANY current office building owner that has a floorplate (and zoning!) that even kind of works will do the same. Unfortunately, the big towers in Midtown generally do not fall in this category, so the owners are stuck.

We shouldn't care about the owners, but we SHOULD care about the tax base.

55

nyc-ModTeam t1_ja8c28o wrote

Rule 5 - No reposts, old content or content unrelated to NYC

(a). No reposts. If you're posting about breaking news, please check for an existing story first. If you found a better write-up, post it.

(b). No old content. Content that is more than 1 year old will be removed.

(c). No content unrelated to the five boroughs or New York metropolitan area. Try our neighbors (in the sidebar) instead.

1

menschmaschine5 t1_ja8bscv wrote

The Taxi and Limousine Commission, the government agency that regulates this stuff in NYC. They probably won't do anything to Lyft, but they can certainly deal with the driver.

The BBB is not a government agency or enforcement body, it's just Yelp with a name designed so that gullible people will think they're more official than they are. And, like yelp, it's a pay for ratings scheme.

2

d4ng3rz0n3 t1_ja8bnux wrote

I liked living in Midtown near Grand Central, because I could walk to my office in under 10 minutes, and get to anywhere else in the city very quickly via Grand Central, or even by walking. My part of Midtown East/Murray Hill (Park Ave in the 30s) was very residential too.

End of the day, having more units online is better for everyone.

13

Equivalent_Pop7884 OP t1_ja8bdkf wrote

The fee was $80. It’s not the money, it’s the no accountability this company has towards their employees. For me, fine it doesn’t break the bank. But what about people that it’s not the case. What if someone who needs this money is targeted and then like a domino effect they got late fees, and other issues due to this single fraudulent act, and there is not way to fight back because Lyft just closes chats on you. It’s a sad state of affairs.

2