Recent comments in /f/nyc
pixel_of_moral_decay t1_jactjyq wrote
Reply to comment by Neoliberalism2024 in Consultants Gone Wild by ToffeeFever
It’s almost as if consultants might be financially encouraged to find places to spend money, and turn their backs on potential overruns since their not subject to the scrutiny a public employee is.
603er t1_jactd6n wrote
Reply to comment by ripstep1 in Consultants Gone Wild by ToffeeFever
Well you wouldn’t now because apple can attract more workers with better salaries. If we funded government agencies to pay employees competitively then perhaps that would change. Again - self fulfilling.
IndependentContest84 t1_jactah3 wrote
Reply to Snow total inaccuracies by PoopEmoji8618
Most weather apps base their numbers on if the snow was to land on the ground and stay how much would accumulate. They dont factor in if it melts before hitting the ground or melts when it hits the ground. Numbers get changed based on ground temperature and wind factors.
JETobal t1_jact5hy wrote
Reply to comment by FizzyJews in Snow total inaccuracies by PoopEmoji8618
Ha cha cha
AGripInVan t1_jact5fl wrote
I can C that
603er t1_jact4no wrote
Reply to comment by ripstep1 in Consultants Gone Wild by ToffeeFever
Yea definitely dude they all buy dodge chargers. It’s not because base pay for a E4 is terrible.
pixel_of_moral_decay t1_jact4bu wrote
Reply to comment by 603er in Consultants Gone Wild by ToffeeFever
Healthcare too.
They complain about waste and want everything private, then private companies make billions effectively just sitting in between payments.
Government could do what health insurance does for a fraction of the price given it just needs to break even not appease shareholders.
But good luck convincing “small government” bull shit artists that shareholder profit is part of the waste problem.
atari_Pro t1_jact2cf wrote
Lmao imagine thinking congestion pricing is the magic bullet we need.
EatingAssCuresCancer t1_jact22r wrote
Reply to Consultants Gone Wild by ToffeeFever
It’s absolutely hilarious that all the austerity, big government haters ended up hiring those same former bureaucrats, now working in industry, for 3x their original cost. It’s like they forgot that we actually need government to do stuff?
atari_Pro t1_jacsyhr wrote
Where’s all the congestion pricing cheerleaders? Been pretty quiet lately as the MTA gets exposed for its offensive mismanagement.
Coolioho t1_jacsqd6 wrote
Reply to Snow total inaccuracies by PoopEmoji8618
I guess they tossed the Dark Skies app out for nothing
ripstep1 t1_jacspg7 wrote
Reply to comment by 603er in Consultants Gone Wild by ToffeeFever
Why would I pay government programmers 300k a year when their production is inferior to Apple or MSFT?
DelTeaz t1_jacsnxm wrote
Reply to comment by Stefan_Harper in Feds not coming to MTA’s rescue under GOP House, Schumer says by newzee1
Has the MTA ever tried not to light money on fire? I’m not advocating for lowering the budget, just don’t fucking ask for more when you wasted what you already get.
manticorpse t1_jacsmyx wrote
Reply to comment by Effective_Scale7650 in Someone in Richmond hill is torturing cats. by bedbuffaloes
Honestly... giving people breaks. Obviously being completely vegan "no exceptions" is more impactful than occasionally slipping up, or by being vegetarian, or by being a "Tuesday vegan" or whatever. But people get very, very defensive about their dietary preferences, and a person doing something is better than doing nothing, so you gotta give people breaks sometimes. When you hop into conversations preaching veganism with (I'll be frank) an air of superiority, you will make some contrarians reading the conversation shift their mindsets from "maybe it's okay to eat vegan once or twice a week" to "fuck vegans, I'm eating a steak at every meal".
So you gotta be careful. You need to praise people for doing what they can, and you can't shame them for "not being vegan enough". Because the purity-testing BS will turn people against you.
(This is a level of tact that extends beyond online discussions on diet, and if it's a skill you haven't learned yet then it might serve you well to practice it. Catch more bees with honey than with vinegar, etc.)
As for proactive things you can do... honestly, learn to cook delicious vegan food that appeals to omnivores, and then serve it to them. Bonus points if they don't know it's vegan until you tell them. There's this thing in teaching called a discrepant event, which is when you shock someone out of their preconceptions by presenting them suddenly with a surprising situation which challenges their assumptions. In this case, the assumption would be "vegan food is boring and gross" or "a meal doesn't feel complete without animal products in it". So don't give them a salad. Learn to make an awesome, delicious curry with some vegan naan, something hearty and filling... serve it to them, let them give you accolades about how great your cooking is... and then tell them casually that it's vegan. Surprise them into learning that eating vegan doesn't have to be a sacrifice.
ripstep1 t1_jacsmmz wrote
Reply to comment by 603er in Consultants Gone Wild by ToffeeFever
Soldiers on food stamps is because they use their money to take out loans for cars. Another perfect example of government incompetence
azspeedbullet t1_jacsh7c wrote
i still call that parkway the interborough parkway
nuevalaredo t1_jacsffp wrote
Reply to Consultants Gone Wild by ToffeeFever
Another reason is we hire politician with no practical skills or business experience. They in turn hire consultants to recommend courses of action, and hire other consultants to oversee the work being done. The delegation of authority helps inoculate the decision maker, but comes with a price.
ripstep1 t1_jacsed7 wrote
Reply to comment by Karrick in Consultants Gone Wild by ToffeeFever
It’s not the aim. It’s the core problem. Why work for a do nothing government entity when you can do real work in private industry
CactusBoyScout t1_jacsa14 wrote
Reply to comment by dekalbavenue in Feds not coming to MTA’s rescue under GOP House, Schumer says by newzee1
I remember reading years ago that NYC transit actually gets relatively little of its funding from the federal government compared to other global cities.
Supposedly other global cities have national governments that recognize how much of a return on investment their largest cities generate economically and so they support their infrastructure more. And other countries are more likely to have their seat of government in their largest city so the lawmakers are more keenly aware of its infrastructure.
But our federal government is sharply skewed in favor of rural states who don’t want to support big cities while taking huge subsidies for themselves.
ripstep1 t1_jacs9p7 wrote
Reply to comment by LittleKitty235 in Feds not coming to MTA’s rescue under GOP House, Schumer says by newzee1
Absolutely. Why is the federal taxpayer paying for roads in Brooklyn.
Offthepoint t1_jacs454 wrote
Reply to Lost Engagement Ring in Fidi - Feb 10 by Biancav89
Try Craigslist, NYC, lost and found.
eatsleep19 t1_jacrx89 wrote
Reply to comment by Financial-Current289 in DOT misspells Jackie Robinson’s name on Jackie Robinson Parkway by KatzDeli
At as cost of $250,000 per
Any_Foundation_9034 t1_jacrsrf wrote
“You had one job ta do!”
Kiritowerty t1_jacrkvr wrote
Reply to comment by mowotlarx in Modular Portland Loo Toilets Will Be Tried in NYC Parks - THE CITY by space_______kat
Your terms are agreeable! 🤝
RedditSkippy t1_jactm61 wrote
Reply to comment by azspeedbullet in DOT misspells Jackie Robinson’s name on Jackie Robinson Parkway by KatzDeli
I always wonder about that. I didn’t have any experience with the parkway until it was renamed, so for me, it’s always been “the Jackie.”
It’s similar to the Tappan Zee. There’s no way I’m calling it the “Mario Cuomo.”