Recent comments in /f/nyc

NetQuarterLatte t1_jad83ot wrote

For companies, remote worker benefits the companies more than the workers. Because in-office work would require both a high salary plus the costs of the office space. In contrast, a remote worker, even if making the same salary, would still cost the company less.

For city workers, I have concerns with people working for the city, but who at the same time don't live in the city. It doesn't really matter to me if they work remotely as long as they live in the city.

But if they are going to be making decisions that impacts the city, they need to have some skin in the game, in my opinion.

18

ChrisFromLongIsland t1_jad76un wrote

Remote work will draw NYC salaries down and low wage places up. There will be a national salary for a lot of jobs.

I was at a seminar where companies in low wage areas where complaining they were losing their advantage of low priced workers. The low priced workers demanded higher wages they could get working remote for companies in high cost areas.

7

robbyt t1_jad6oz3 wrote

Reply to comment by NYY657545 in Consultants Gone Wild by ToffeeFever

Under capitalism, workers get jobs that pay the best. Government jobs do not pay as well as private jobs. Therefore government jobs are staffed with people who have accepted lower paying jobs, and the reason they accept lower paying jobs is because they're not capable (or don’t want) a better paying job.

0

Neoliberalism2024 t1_jad6aa4 wrote

Reply to comment by tikihiki in Consultants Gone Wild by ToffeeFever

What incentive do government employees have? They cant be fired for performing badly, and can’t be rewarded much for performing well. If they spend too much money, they just ask for more money (as opposed to a private company where your execs get fired when expenses get out of hand).

6

drpvn t1_jad5ccb wrote

It would nonetheless be a huge mistake for the city to accept this framing. It would be expensive (bad for NYC taxpayers), it would create two tiers of employees, and it would cause remote workers to demand pay parity with in-person workers, ultimately making it even more expensive (even worse for taxpayers). The city should reject the idea that remote work is an employee benefit.

9