Recent comments in /f/nyc
Rottimer t1_jad8su9 wrote
Reply to comment by vowelqueue in DOT misspells Jackie Robinson’s name on Jackie Robinson Parkway by KatzDeli
And honestly, the Jackie Robinson is fucking awful. Not the infrastructure as much as the drivers though.
TejasJShah t1_jad85hy wrote
Reply to comment by azspeedbullet in DOT misspells Jackie Robinson’s name on Jackie Robinson Parkway by KatzDeli
JRP baby
NetQuarterLatte t1_jad83ot wrote
For companies, remote worker benefits the companies more than the workers. Because in-office work would require both a high salary plus the costs of the office space. In contrast, a remote worker, even if making the same salary, would still cost the company less.
For city workers, I have concerns with people working for the city, but who at the same time don't live in the city. It doesn't really matter to me if they work remotely as long as they live in the city.
But if they are going to be making decisions that impacts the city, they need to have some skin in the game, in my opinion.
Due-Toe2141 t1_jad82l1 wrote
Reply to comment by bsanchey in DOT misspells Jackie Robinson’s name on Jackie Robinson Parkway by KatzDeli
it's an indication that the DOT hires people without any formal education
swampy13 t1_jad803k wrote
Reply to Calling all New Yorkers: A few numbers with the 212 area code are back in circulation by Mannyplaid
I did the switch. As much as a recycled number might bring baggage with it, I already had that. I'm petty, I want the optics of a 212.
stonklifebaby t1_jad7s9b wrote
FAIL
meteoraln t1_jad777p wrote
Reply to comment by 603er in Consultants Gone Wild by ToffeeFever
Cant they just pick cheaper contractors? Or limit the budget so there’s less money for politicians to fill their friend’s pockets?
ChrisFromLongIsland t1_jad76un wrote
Remote work will draw NYC salaries down and low wage places up. There will be a national salary for a lot of jobs.
I was at a seminar where companies in low wage areas where complaining they were losing their advantage of low priced workers. The low priced workers demanded higher wages they could get working remote for companies in high cost areas.
NYY657545 t1_jad6ypt wrote
Reply to comment by robbyt in Consultants Gone Wild by ToffeeFever
Hence, private sector consultants taking on high paying RFPs. They’re not to blame.
Southern_Dragonfly57 t1_jad6trj wrote
They had one Job to do...
j1nx718 t1_jad6s65 wrote
Everyone involved in printing, quality control and putting this up should be reprimanded. What a disrespect.
[deleted] OP t1_jad6qr5 wrote
Reply to comment by drpvn in Salvia divinorum by [deleted]
[removed]
usernamematchesagain t1_jad6qju wrote
Reply to Salvia divinorum by [deleted]
caution hehe
robbyt t1_jad6oz3 wrote
Reply to comment by NYY657545 in Consultants Gone Wild by ToffeeFever
Under capitalism, workers get jobs that pay the best. Government jobs do not pay as well as private jobs. Therefore government jobs are staffed with people who have accepted lower paying jobs, and the reason they accept lower paying jobs is because they're not capable (or don’t want) a better paying job.
ExtraBitterSpecial t1_jad6ofw wrote
Reply to comment by Grass8989 in Burying Moses' biggest middle finger to the city? Plan to tunnel the BQE being discussed by scooterflaneuse
Yes!
DocBee65 t1_jad6nzx wrote
Geniuses they aren’t 🥸
[deleted] t1_jad6jju wrote
[deleted]
spoil_of_the_cities t1_jad6axf wrote
In person workers need to be paid enough to live in NYC
Remote workers only need to be paid enough to live in Missouri, or maybe the Philippines
Neoliberalism2024 t1_jad6aa4 wrote
Reply to comment by tikihiki in Consultants Gone Wild by ToffeeFever
What incentive do government employees have? They cant be fired for performing badly, and can’t be rewarded much for performing well. If they spend too much money, they just ask for more money (as opposed to a private company where your execs get fired when expenses get out of hand).
iheartvintage t1_jad69wd wrote
drpvn t1_jad68sa wrote
Reply to Salvia divinorum by [deleted]
This sounds like a really great idea.
drpvn t1_jad5ccb wrote
Reply to comment by arrogant_ambassador in How much is remote work worth? New York City is about to find out. by arrogant_ambassador
It would nonetheless be a huge mistake for the city to accept this framing. It would be expensive (bad for NYC taxpayers), it would create two tiers of employees, and it would cause remote workers to demand pay parity with in-person workers, ultimately making it even more expensive (even worse for taxpayers). The city should reject the idea that remote work is an employee benefit.
AmazingChickenWings t1_jad58l5 wrote
Reply to comment by bsanchey in DOT misspells Jackie Robinson’s name on Jackie Robinson Parkway by KatzDeli
She sounds hideous.
arrogant_ambassador OP t1_jad4ucr wrote
Reply to comment by drpvn in How much is remote work worth? New York City is about to find out. by arrogant_ambassador
The city doesn’t want those savings.
PaulyKPykes t1_jad8yaa wrote
Reply to DOT misspells Jackie Robinson’s name on Jackie Robinson Parkway by KatzDeli
Yo it's ya boi Jake Rob