Recent comments in /f/nyc
MyojoRepair t1_jadnn32 wrote
Reply to comment by ripstep1 in Consultants Gone Wild by ToffeeFever
> Soldiers on food stamps is because they use their money to take out loans for cars. Another perfect example of government incompetence
How is that government incompetence and not individual incompetence.
Few-Artichoke-2531 t1_jadnfwi wrote
Reply to comment by centech in DOT misspells Jackie Robinson’s name on Jackie Robinson Parkway by KatzDeli
This was the Interborough Parkway.
Stefan_Harper t1_jadneot wrote
Reply to comment by Lopsided-Employment3 in Someone in Richmond hill is torturing cats. by bedbuffaloes
I’m sure
notheld717 t1_jadn3el wrote
Really sad thing... Ask yourself how many people touched this project either from a design or graphics perspective and no-one caught the mistake or actually gave a shit enough to correct it. Big gov't rides again. Just keep spending $$$ and focus on anything other than what is important.
lakehop t1_jadmwme wrote
Reply to comment by Informal_Bus_4077 in Someone in Richmond hill is torturing cats. by bedbuffaloes
Do contact NYPD.
lakehop t1_jadmqdv wrote
Reply to comment by TakingADumpRightNow in DOT misspells Jackie Robinson’s name on Jackie Robinson Parkway by KatzDeli
Definitely not!
dekalbavenue t1_jadmo49 wrote
Reply to comment by Endofunctor in Feds not coming to MTA’s rescue under GOP House, Schumer says by newzee1
It's not about going from 1.6 trillion to zero. It's about going from 1.6 trillion to 1.3 trillion (a loss of $300 billion) because the government couldn't bother to invest $3 billion. That's plausible if the MTA is dysfunctional to the point where economic decisions are made to account for it. To put it in perspective, the MTA strike in 2005 cost the city economy about $400 million a day. In 2023 dollars, that number would be closer to $615 million. Imagine if you will, a non functioning MTA that lasted a year. Or, a sub par functional MTA over a few years, say, over a presidential cycle.
Do you think hyperpartisanship for the benefit of Fox News viewers is worth $300 billion in lost public revenue?
stevengeeez t1_jadmeuj wrote
I wonder how many hands this sign got passed through, from designing, to printing on the sign, to delivery and installation. Not one person in this process had the decency to flag this.
George4Mayor86 t1_jadmd4r wrote
Reply to comment by nim_opet in Consultants Gone Wild by ToffeeFever
That’s true, and I don’t blame the consultants for going where they money is.
El_Gato t1_jadmbql wrote
It's still the Interboro. This was done by an old school queens dude, intentionally.
markodochartaigh1 t1_jadm3zf wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in DOT misspells Jackie Robinson’s name on Jackie Robinson Parkway by KatzDeli
*Cats /s
wien-tang-clan t1_jadm1h5 wrote
nim_opet t1_jadm0zm wrote
Reply to comment by George4Mayor86 in Consultants Gone Wild by ToffeeFever
I mean, the consultants are filling the need. They didn’t create it .
Treat--14 t1_jadlwxm wrote
This city gets upset about the literal smallest things god damn
jae343 t1_jadlu01 wrote
Reply to comment by Calm-Heat-5883 in Midtown Owners Hedge on Costly Office-to-Home Conversions by psychothumbs
Because inflation and demand, my house was worth $300k in 2000 now it's close to a million. My neighborhood isn't wealthy at all but it attracts working class families that can afford decent mortgages.
And to answer your question if I'm a real estate agent or not why does that matter...? But no I'm not. Although but I understand the absolutely stupid bureaucracy to get things done in this city, the technical feasibility in terms of construction, design, code, finances, etc more than your average person.
lupuscapabilis t1_jadltuq wrote
Reply to comment by KatzDeli in DOT misspells Jackie Robinson’s name on Jackie Robinson Parkway by KatzDeli
I honestly forgot it was called the Ed Koch. I still use 59th street.
T1mac t1_jadlqb9 wrote
They ran out of space for the letters on the top line, and decided it was close enough.  ̄\_(ツ)_/ ̄
lupuscapabilis t1_jadlq21 wrote
Reply to comment by Rottimer in DOT misspells Jackie Robinson’s name on Jackie Robinson Parkway by KatzDeli
What, you don't feel safe with an enclosed 2-lane area with curves and drivers doing 50?
markodochartaigh1 t1_jadlnru wrote
Reply to comment by ruffdaddysmooth in DOT misspells Jackie Robinson’s name on Jackie Robinson Parkway by KatzDeli
Well, Verrazzano was butchered and eaten by Carib Indians.
drpvn t1_jadlbuc wrote
Reply to comment by hulks_brother in How much is remote work worth? New York City is about to find out. by arrogant_ambassador
More like bonus potato. In person gets a bonus. Remote gets a potato.
kjuneja t1_jadl8vy wrote
Reply to comment by mr_feenys_car in Midtown Owners Hedge on Costly Office-to-Home Conversions by psychothumbs
No exit clause? Amateur hour
George4Mayor86 t1_jadl8gp wrote
Reply to comment by nim_opet in Consultants Gone Wild by ToffeeFever
….which in turn forces cities to rely on expensive consultants rather than in-house expertise. So it is the consultants, but it’s also the hostility to bureaucracy. Chicken and egg.
c0satnd t1_jadkt1p wrote
Sigh. They’re really employing the divide and conquer strategy and some folks in this thread are already falling right into it.
fieryscribe t1_jadkrgs wrote
Reply to comment by Karrick in Consultants Gone Wild by ToffeeFever
> It is not incompetence to have to hire consultants to manage consultants when there is no one left. It's making the best of what you have when given an otherwise impossible task.
I think this is the crux of our disagreement. To me, if I was given no ability to manage my consultants, but forced to use them, that would be an inability to do something successfully. If I didn't kick it up and say it would be unsuccessful, that would be a failure of action too. If I was still forced to do so, the incompetence doesn't go away; it just includes those above me.
I do not malign those workers as being malicious, stupid or bad people. Simply, to me, they are incompetent in the literal sense of the term, especially if they were put in that situation (which necessarily means that those above them are also incompetent). Moreover, per the report, they used consultancies to fight the bureaucracy in the system. So they were willing participants in this quagmire.
For what it's worth, I just want efficient and effective government. It may mean that government(s) have in-house staff or they hire consultants. I think what this article elides, but the report emphasizes, is that our government is inefficient and ineffective (for a variety of reasons). We, as voters, should force government to be prudent with our money. I have no control over the various consultancies, but I do have some say in my government.
[deleted] t1_jadnpp3 wrote
Reply to DOT misspells Jackie Robinson’s name on Jackie Robinson Parkway by KatzDeli
[removed]