Recent comments in /f/nyc

NetQuarterLatte t1_jajf56u wrote

I'll copy my reply here too:

>Arguing that it isn't assault because the offense isn't named "___ assault" in NY is pedantic.

It's not pedantic.

It's actually quite relevant to this news, because they are proposing changes to assault when committed against retail works.

They are not proposing changes to offenses that are not assault under NY Law.

2

NetQuarterLatte t1_jajf08a wrote

>Arguing that it isn't assault because the offense isn't named "___ assault" in NY is pedantic.

It's not pedantic.

It's actually quite relevant to this news, because they are proposing changes to assault when committed against retail works.

They are not proposing changes to offenses that are not assault under NY Law.

4

ShadownetZero t1_jajeidh wrote

Copying my response to your other reply:

>While they are not labeled "assault", there are various different offenses that fall under that same article you listed that don't require injury.

>Arguing that it isn't assault because the offense isn't named "___ assault" in NY is pedantic.

1

thenewyorktimes t1_jajarvu wrote

Thanks for sharing! Here’s a free gift link to the above story.
We have an update. The New York City Council held an oversight hearing on Wednesday to examine the NYPD's Strategic Response Group a day after a multimillion-dollar settlement with protesters who said they were mistreated when they marched against the killing of George Floyd in 2020. No one from the Police Department came. Read the full story without a subscription here.

29

GlitteringHighway t1_jaj912y wrote

The individual officer pays for the insurance. The officer creates an issue where they are at fault. Insurance pays out, the officer's premium goes up. Eventually it's not financially worth it to be a bad cop. It's not a perfect solution. At the moment the citizen is on the hook for bad conduct. This would solve that.

8

rNBA_Mods_Be_Better t1_jaj5re1 wrote

> They'd literally burn this city to the ground.

This is exactly the heart of the problem. The people responsible for "keeping law and order" in the city would burn it to the ground in a heartbeat if they were faced with accountability for doing illegal shit. It's the most glaringly obvious reason to disband them if we want a longterm solution.

39

TonyzTone t1_jaj53in wrote

It's a classic "who watches the watchmen" situation.

The separate organization could be the Attorney General, which is far enough removed from daily policing activities that it makes sense. Civilian Complaint Review Board is also independent of NYPD so, there's that.

The issue is ultimately accountability. What should happen if a police officer steps outside of their legally-restrained role which unfortunately exists in a fast-paced, high-tension environment with a lot of grey areas and "he said, she said."

2

RepresentativeAge444 t1_jaixfk3 wrote

I agree. I believe that punishment for violent crimes should be harsh given the impact on victims, their loved ones and the overall impact to society. It makes my blood boil when people get no jail time for violent assaults and then go on to wreak more havoc. Rehabilitation for non violent crime where applicable, stiff penalties for violent crime and greater investment in society to help prevent crime in the first place.

2