Recent comments in /f/nyc

dboggny t1_jcqj36y wrote

I used to support the Met but haven’t in a long time for a few reasons. In this instance they cut ties with her, Gergiev and and finally Levine. Yet, they can’t afford to do it completely. They still play their music on SeriusXM all the time, especially Levine. Ditto on their own streaming platform. So they will banish you for your beliefs but still make money off of you while we can. IMO what Levine did was much worse and it was the worst kept secret in NYC since the 70s.

6

[deleted] t1_jcq301q wrote

There's a lot more to it than these two sentences. She has close ties to Vladimir Putin and her denouncement of the war was a single statement amid a sea of others that were pro-Putin on her social media. Even her denouncement last February was halfhearted and with plenty of "buts".

From the NYT: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/22/arts/music/anna-netrebko-opera-putin-russia.html

The Met has been trying to deal with her for a while. Since the annexation of Crimea and when the war was limited to Russian-backed separatists in Donetsk and Luhansk, she has been very vocal on her social media in support of the separatists and Vladimir Putin.

The Met made the decision not to engage her during the war because she continues to wholeheartedly support Putin, her Feb. 26 "denouncement" notwithstanding.

It was the right move, albeit expensive. The Met Opera has a bigger budget than any other American nonprofit performing arts organization, and they can't employ outspoken Putin supporters. There are other sopranos.

33

RyzinEnagy t1_jcpxznk wrote

True on a macro level.

NYC had a specific set of circumstances. The nickel fare was kept way too long, and the city's money went to Moses' highways instead of system maintenance. The city went broke in the 70s and was forced to cede control of the subways to the state. Today we're playing catch-up for maintenance that should have been done 50-100 years ago, and the subway is still under state control.

6