Recent comments in /f/philosophy
oman54 t1_itxekyo wrote
Reply to comment by bobbib14 in Aaron Rodgers, “Critical Thinking,” and Intellectual Humility by ADefiniteDescription
Eh he'll support Kanye but as a "free speech absolutist"
Isra443 t1_itxedxj wrote
Reply to comment by wow-signal in Logical positivism does not dispense with metaphysics, as it aimed to. It merely proposes a different kind of metaphysics, in which natural sciences take the privileged position once occupied by rationalist metaphysics. by IAI_Admin
Yeah I concur with this. There are no more logical positivists anymore, at least not in a renowned and/or academic setting.
[deleted] t1_itxe3gh wrote
[removed]
coyote-1 t1_itxd3ik wrote
Reply to comment by AaronRodgersToe in Aaron Rodgers, “Critical Thinking,” and Intellectual Humility by ADefiniteDescription
Are you saying the Packers would have paid him even if he chose to sit out in support of his erstwhile principles?
randeylahey t1_itxcvtl wrote
Reply to comment by wooyeah-awwyeah in Aaron Rodgers, “Critical Thinking,” and Intellectual Humility by ADefiniteDescription
By Aaron Rodgers. Featuring Aaron Rodgers.
coyote-1 t1_itxcvsn wrote
Reply to comment by OceanicLemur in Aaron Rodgers, “Critical Thinking,” and Intellectual Humility by ADefiniteDescription
The author is free to do that, as are you.
jayandsilentjohn t1_itxcqg9 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Aaron Rodgers, “Critical Thinking,” and Intellectual Humility by ADefiniteDescription
If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks likes a duck, it’s a fucking duck
[deleted] t1_itxcn2k wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Aaron Rodgers, “Critical Thinking,” and Intellectual Humility by ADefiniteDescription
[removed]
Thirdwhirly t1_itxchij wrote
Reply to comment by bobbib14 in Aaron Rodgers, “Critical Thinking,” and Intellectual Humility by ADefiniteDescription
He’s gonna go by “Aa” soon.
[deleted] t1_itxc8nn wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Naturally Fine Tuned for Life - A Defence of Metaphysical Naturalism by Colin_Mangan
[removed]
bac5665 t1_itxc5m8 wrote
Reply to comment by Kyocus in Logical positivism does not dispense with metaphysics, as it aimed to. It merely proposes a different kind of metaphysics, in which natural sciences take the privileged position once occupied by rationalist metaphysics. by IAI_Admin
Thank you for giving me flashbacks to the only class I ever flunked out of.
Good lord that stuff was hard. I could read the textbook and say "yes, I understand that." And then I could not repeat a word of it back to you 5 minutes later. It just didn't stick in brain at all.
pab_guy t1_itxb4wy wrote
Reply to comment by fjccommish in Aaron Rodgers, “Critical Thinking,” and Intellectual Humility by ADefiniteDescription
Mostly politics I guess... is that politician or pundit lying because he believes what he's saying? Or are they just an asshole?
nts4906 t1_itxaqq1 wrote
Reply to comment by Diztrakted in Aaron Rodgers, “Critical Thinking,” and Intellectual Humility by ADefiniteDescription
Haven’t they already?
[deleted] t1_itxajai wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Aaron Rodgers, “Critical Thinking,” and Intellectual Humility by ADefiniteDescription
[removed]
wow-signal t1_itxa0ms wrote
Reply to comment by Kyocus in Logical positivism does not dispense with metaphysics, as it aimed to. It merely proposes a different kind of metaphysics, in which natural sciences take the privileged position once occupied by rationalist metaphysics. by IAI_Admin
very welcome! SEP is an incredible resource
BernardJOrtcutt t1_itx9h0v wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Aaron Rodgers, “Critical Thinking,” and Intellectual Humility by ADefiniteDescription
Your comment was removed for violating the following rule:
>Be Respectful
>Comments which consist of personal attacks will be removed. Users with a history of such comments may be banned. Slurs, racism, and bigotry are absolutely not permitted.
Repeated or serious violations of the subreddit rules will result in a ban.
This is a shared account that is only used for notifications. Please do not reply, as your message will go unread.
ADefiniteDescription OP t1_itx99q9 wrote
Reply to comment by BMXTKD in Aaron Rodgers, “Critical Thinking,” and Intellectual Humility by ADefiniteDescription
I would've posted this even if I weren't a Vikings fan, but it certainly doesn't hurt..
[deleted] t1_itx98q9 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Aaron Rodgers, “Critical Thinking,” and Intellectual Humility by ADefiniteDescription
[removed]
BernardJOrtcutt t1_itx98i9 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Aaron Rodgers, “Critical Thinking,” and Intellectual Humility by ADefiniteDescription
Your comment was removed for violating the following rule:
>Read the Post Before You Reply
>Read/watch/listen the posted content, understand and identify the philosophical arguments given, and respond to these substantively. If you have unrelated thoughts or don't wish to read the content, please post your own thread or simply refrain from commenting. Comments which are clearly not in direct response to the posted content may be removed.
Repeated or serious violations of the subreddit rules will result in a ban.
This is a shared account that is only used for notifications. Please do not reply, as your message will go unread.
[deleted] t1_itx97g8 wrote
[removed]
Kyocus t1_itx8poc wrote
[deleted] t1_itx7iax wrote
[removed]
kishmalik t1_itx7g4e wrote
“What does Aaron Rodgers think he has but doesn’t?”
[deleted] t1_itx7c17 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Aaron Rodgers, “Critical Thinking,” and Intellectual Humility by ADefiniteDescription
[removed]
[deleted] t1_itxf0ka wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Aaron Rodgers, “Critical Thinking,” and Intellectual Humility by ADefiniteDescription
[removed]