Recent comments in /f/pics

snuffles00 t1_j6erdag wrote

Reply to A Magical Building by langshot

I'm curious what marketing they had because if I am reading it right the sign says since 1436. So are they implying that tye recipes are from 1436, we all know the building can't be that old. Shame you never got to try the food.

1

ProjectMew OP t1_j6eqest wrote

Reply to comment by treading_ink_ in Milk for display purposes only by ProjectMew

Did you even read the parent comment?

Dude says “in the original post the fridge unit was faulty”…Then he says “people repost so damn fast these days they don’t take the time to read the original post”…I WROTE THE MF ORIGINAL POST. And in that original post I never said the fridge was faulty. It’s an accusation that I’m reposting someone else’s post.

And fine. Call it a repost by your standards. Idc. But I’m not sure most would agree with your assertion that posting your own original content in multiple subs qualifies as a repost. Its just stupid for them to tell me I ripped off my own content lol

2

treading_ink_ t1_j6epjl6 wrote

Reply to comment by ProjectMew in Milk for display purposes only by ProjectMew

He didn’t accuse you of anything. He said “This was posted yesterday.” Which is true as you just admitted.

You said you haven’t seen any other posts about it, which is a lie because you just said you posted it to another group.

That’s a repost, my guy. It doesn’t have to be in the same sub to be a repost when you literally reposted it to another sub.

1

ProjectMew OP t1_j6ep374 wrote

Reply to comment by treading_ink_ in Milk for display purposes only by ProjectMew

Posted in two separate subs. And both posts were yesterday. Even this post. I’m not out here chain posting the same stuff over multiple days. So yes, it was posted yesterday because this post is from yesterday

And the original content accused me of ripping off another post…which is not the case as this is my picture lol

2