Recent comments in /f/pics
[deleted] t1_itkp0oq wrote
[deleted]
RJSmkyMtn t1_itkozvl wrote
It's an erocktion
Splattabox t1_itkoxda wrote
It’s a dick
[deleted] t1_itknlrt wrote
Reply to comment by milktoastyy in Job hunting in the 1930's, 25% unemployment rate by nsfwdailyy
[removed]
m4nu3lf t1_itkmq7z wrote
Do people even know what caused the depression? Reading the comments it seems like nobody really knows. It was a governmental mistake. The new FED kept interest rates too high.
Good200000 t1_itkmlwb wrote
This was during the Great Depression. Unemployment was greater than 25 percent and the Market crashed
personalcheesecake t1_itkc6l6 wrote
Reply to comment by memento22mori in Anita Ekberg - Paris (1959) by Pasargad
...Lara
milktoastyy t1_itkbm8t wrote
Reply to comment by wish1977 in Job hunting in the 1930's, 25% unemployment rate by nsfwdailyy
Right leaning fella here. For what it's worth, this kinda stuff breaks my heart. Especially so when I see it in real life. My family and I make food bank and rehabilitation center donations every Christmas. A lot of us do care.
Ho3n3r t1_itk9u2s wrote
We still have that in other countries. Our unemployment rate is 33%.
The boards just don't look as fancy.
Lurkingandsearching t1_itk7sjg wrote
Reply to comment by Gorstag in Job hunting in the 1930's, 25% unemployment rate by nsfwdailyy
Not really, Conservative and Progressive as a label is actually not functional as it's just an where an opinion on a policy is. Washington was right when he said Parties were a bad idea, but human nature made it so they would naturally occur. You can be Progressive on some things, Conservative on others, and Regressive on a few things too.
Conservative means keeping the status quo, like wanting to protect free speech. Progressive means changing it, like wanting to change current banking regulations. Finally regressive, which is returning to a previous state, like removing the amendment that banned Alcohol or removing the illegality of Marijuana. Because regress is taken into the negative, it gets the worse rap, so it makes a good buzz word to attack policies a party doesn't like.
They are currently used as basically marketing terms, thus is why I used them because explaining how the terms are suppose to be used in Realpolitick is rather hard to explain. Like explaining Right (Federalism) vs Left (State Power) to people who use them how they are used post 19th century. Now both parties are Federalist (spare the Southern Republicans, but the Federalist pay and run the party). I think the closest definition we use now is the French one, but even that's a bit loosely adapted.
Sorry for the long winded explanation, but I try to stay non-partisan the best I can, though I admit I have my bias's on policy too.
[deleted] t1_itk7ifh wrote
Reply to comment by xilshin in Anita Ekberg - Paris (1959) by Pasargad
[deleted]
jrcske67 t1_itk6sh3 wrote
Reply to comment by Additional-Line-242 in Saw the Northern Lights in Iceland on our first try! by chashu_bao
You’re darn right. I knew this looked familiar but I couldn’t tell why
neanderhummus t1_itk3mh2 wrote
Reply to comment by Thin_Tea_3525 in Job hunting in the 1930's, 25% unemployment rate by nsfwdailyy
At least the sign has work
ChrizTaylor t1_itjzx6s wrote
Reply to comment by coffeebuzzbuzzz in Anita Ekberg - Paris (1959) by Pasargad
I like larger chested women.
Additional-Line-242 t1_itjzu87 wrote
This looks like the house from Courage the Cowardly Dog.
DrJD321 t1_itjzouu wrote
Reply to Anita Ekberg - Paris (1959) by Pasargad
Implants have deffs improved over the years.
Gorstag t1_itjz9zr wrote
Reply to comment by Lurkingandsearching in Job hunting in the 1930's, 25% unemployment rate by nsfwdailyy
Which is why it is a lot easier to just say conservatives and progressives or even liberals. Conservatives have had a long history of being pretty shit people.
[deleted] t1_itjywuc wrote
Reply to comment by ikantolol in Anita Ekberg - Paris (1959) by Pasargad
[removed]
kaleidoscopevoyager t1_itjyw33 wrote
That’s incredible
xo_HotTia t1_itjyrc8 wrote
Amazing. I wonder what ancient people made of the northern lights. Are they from the spirit world, or maybe an omen? They're so otherworldly looking
Shoddy_Performer_999 t1_itjxd9q wrote
Reply to comment by PizzaPet in Job hunting in the 1930's, 25% unemployment rate by nsfwdailyy
Highest unemployment since the great depression. Trump's legacy.
Well that, and his insurrection.
If trump was a secret dem sent to fuck over republicans, it would make so much more sense.
PizzaPet t1_itjwjpn wrote
Reply to comment by Shoddy_Performer_999 in Job hunting in the 1930's, 25% unemployment rate by nsfwdailyy
Okay, I'll take your silence on the correction as you at least accepting that you were wrong.
I didn't say let's forget it. I'm saying take it with a grain of salt.
Shoddy_Performer_999 t1_itjw3ak wrote
Reply to comment by PizzaPet in Job hunting in the 1930's, 25% unemployment rate by nsfwdailyy
Let's just forget the highest unemployment since the great depression since it makes trump look like shit? Nope. Too bad.
Trump is responsible for his mishandling of covid. Nobody else. He lied and a million americans died. Worst president ever. Also a traitor since his insurrection.
PizzaPet t1_itjvwjy wrote
Reply to comment by Shoddy_Performer_999 in Job hunting in the 1930's, 25% unemployment rate by nsfwdailyy
Your original comment "we didn't see unemployment numbers that high again until Trump". No, we never saw unemployment numbers that high since 1933.
Your original comment did not say highest unemployment since the great depression. I can't help you backtracking.
Yeah, I feel it's fair to take the peak rate during covid with a grain of salt. I mean, Obama got to 10% without the world shutting down. What's 4.7% more when a global pandemic is in full swing?
Anyway, have a night.
Edit: "we didn't see those unemployment numbers until Trump" same thing. We never saw them again.
[deleted] t1_itkp3jw wrote
Reply to A stone sculpture at Broken Hill, Australia by redrich2000
[deleted]