Recent comments in /f/pittsburgh
ktxhopem3276 t1_j5hqmxt wrote
Reply to comment by Trooper-Man1776 in If only.. by metracta
The county is going to put most transit funding toward bus lanes since we already have decent dedicated bus ways. Building a comprehensive light rail network would cost around $10 billion dollars and the state republicans prefer to build highways instead. There are two trolly extensions under consideration - northward to Bellevue or Ross.
Page 54 has the map of future projects
https://nextransitdraftplan.blob.core.windows.net/finalplan/NEXTransit%20-%20FINAL-web%209-16-21.pdf
ktxhopem3276 t1_j5hps0w wrote
Reply to comment by Sankara_Connolly2020 in If only.. by metracta
Sky bus would have been a boondoggle had they spent money in it but I don’t think they did. All the funding when to the trolley redline instead. They spent $500 million in 1980 dollars or $2billion in todays money to build the red line. Add another $500 billion for the blue line and $500 million for the north shore extension.
Here are some interesting pictures during the build out
https://www.brooklineconnection.com/history/Trolleys/Trolley29.html
speedofdark8 t1_j5hdgn7 wrote
Sankara_Connolly2020 t1_j5hd5h8 wrote
How is the red line a “boondoggle?” Converting old trolley and interurban ROWs into LRT with an integrated Downtown subway system is fundamentally sound transit planning. The mistake is that Port Authority only did this for a couple South Hills routes instead of across the city (partially due to the huge bet they placed on “Skybus,” which was an actual boondoggle).
Trooper-Man1776 t1_j5hbfhk wrote
Honestly, the T most definitely could use some expansion. They could start by restoring the green line and the brown line. I've ridden both the T and the Metro in Washington D.C. as well. It's been a boon to our nation's capitol and, given our past light rail history, It could be a boon for Pittsburgh too.
Sankara_Connolly2020 t1_j5hbf1j wrote
Reply to comment by thisabadusername in If only.. by metracta
Because saying “UPitt” is redundant.
Pitt = University of Pittsburgh
UPitt = University University of Pittsburgh
Sankara_Connolly2020 t1_j5hb81n wrote
Reply to comment by stambouline in If only.. by metracta
Skybus was gadgetban and a total boondoggle. If Port Authority had instead put its energy right off the bat towards the busways and streamlining the streetcar system into a comprehensive LRT system, then today we’d have one of the best transit systems pound for pound in North America.
Sankara_Connolly2020 t1_j5harlb wrote
Bradbitzer t1_j5h9gih wrote
Reply to comment by thisabadusername in If only.. by metracta
Haha, indeed. Now we just have University of Toronto and Toronto Metropolitan University (renamed since Ryerson was very problematic)
thisabadusername t1_j5h95ts wrote
Reply to comment by Bradbitzer in If only.. by metracta
I suppose you don’t have to worry about getting it confused with the highly prestigious University of Toledo /s
mechanical_parody t1_j5h8xni wrote
Reply to comment by thisabadusername in If only.. by metracta
Well damn, I pass this every day and never realized what it was. It's located just outside of the Allegheny Airport, what used to be the Bombarider parking lot.
diabeet0 t1_j5h8j4d wrote
Reply to comment by KentuckYSnow in If only.. by metracta
Boooo
[deleted] t1_j5h5gsp wrote
Ya you never feel thirsty in Pittsburgh. Can certainly believe it.
rocketcrotch t1_j5h5er0 wrote
Reply to comment by KentuckYSnow in Where can you get rid of bad fuel in Pittsburgh? by fobreezee
This is good advice. It's much, much worse to run gas without oil in an engine that requires mixed gas than it is to run mixed gas in an engine that runs on gasoline.
[deleted] t1_j5h4wq2 wrote
Wanna come over for some Water 💧 and ?
44problems t1_j5h4w0j wrote
ThrowRA_wear t1_j5h3dnl wrote
Reply to Best romantic hotel for valentine’s day by zaneborghol
Sheetz
1stCaptainSkrall t1_j5gyr6p wrote
1stCaptainSkrall t1_j5gy8h9 wrote
Reply to comment by Ralph_the_Dude in If only.. by metracta
Nah they aren't called that anymore. I don't know what they changed the name to, though. It'll be memory holed like how Heinz Field is still Heinz Field
CARLEtheCamry t1_j5gy1o3 wrote
Reply to comment by TransporterOffline in Armstrong fiber Gbps internet experience? by cjoshi112385
My self-terminated cables frequently negotiate down to 100Mb from 1000. Honestly, I gave up and bought a good wi-fi adapter which gets about 200Mb and 18ms pings, which is good enough for most of what I do. And then the leftover 800Mb of bandwidth, I don't have to worry about the kids DLing a PS5 game or streaming 4k.
_TheHalfTruth_ t1_j5gsqz4 wrote
Reply to comment by thisabadusername in If only.. by metracta
And it was killed by politicians who mistakenly thought it would be better to deface our city with billions of dollars worth of decaying roads and complicated and unpredictable bus lines.
Also remaking that with modern electric rail tech instead of rubber tire busses could easily triple its top speed while reducing energy and maintenance costs and increasing capacity.
ktxhopem3276 t1_j5hrrt5 wrote
Reply to comment by Rodriguezry in If only.. by metracta
You have stumbled on the problem with building more light rail. is very expensive to build it to all the suburbs. It is a lot cheaper to build dedicated busways in the core that are shared by multiple routes while buses use existing routes further out I. The suburbs. There is a project in the 5-15 year time frame to build rapid bus transit on the sourth shore of the Allegheny to new Kensington and a project in the 15-25 year timeline for some smaller bus improvements on the north shore of the Allegheny from Etna to Natrona.
https://nextransitdraftplan.blob.core.windows.net/finalplan/NEXTransit%20-%20FINAL-web%209-16-21.pdf
Map is on page 54