Recent comments in /f/pittsburgh

CounterSensitive776 t1_japztbm wrote

All new residential construction in the city had to block a percentage of apartments off for the affordable housing program, which provides reduced rent based on income. It's a convoluted program and how "affordable" it is is debatable, but it allows Democrats to claim they are doing something about the current housing crisis.

The city also rakes in the permit fees and other associated costs that come with new construction.

I am not by any means advocating for these buildings, just explaining what goes on behind the scenes a little bit.

3

gucci_gucci_gu t1_japrbe8 wrote

We can only handle so much traffic congestion from construction in this city at once. Capitalist projects need to be a last priority. Pittsburgh is blue for a reason. Go to Texas

−3

gucci_gucci_gu t1_japr4u1 wrote

Landlords are the opposite of the working class. And why yes, you have discovered my the intended satire of my username- that label chasers are babies. Excellent work Ignorant Veil!

16

VeilofIgnorance- t1_japqp9l wrote

Not sure how being a jerk to a working class person is fighting for the working class and supporting blah blah blah.

Also, lol: “gucci_gucci…” the great class warrior!

−22

glutenglen t1_japp5yt wrote

Also fuck the landlords who host multiple open houses and don't tell you it's an open house until you arrive, just to farm hundreds of $50 application fees. I showed up in person and was offering a $5k deposit and was very well qualified just to be ghosted after the application fee and see the home still hosting open houses for weeks.

3

glutenglen t1_japovch wrote

The best is when you tour, and then get the copy of the lease and they make you pay $120 a month for their wifi whether you want it or not, a $60 community garbage fee, and then a $250 a month "ancillary" fee. When I moved to Pittsburgh 4 out of the 5 apartments I drove an hour and a half to see did this and wasted my time. An apartment advertised at $1,200 was in reality $1,700 with all their required fees. Absolutely ridiculous.

I got lucky and found a house with a landlord that has just a couple houses and is very down to earth.

2

Steely_McNeatHouse t1_japl250 wrote

I don't get the normative system of how/why landlords/property owners think they get to set their prices?!? It should be bid/ask. That's how 'Market' rate works (at least theoretically in stonk world). We as renters need to stop slapping their high ask and bid lower rates.

0

Eagleburgerite t1_japbhpx wrote

Any time any one is pressuring someone to make a financial decision on the spot or within days, it's some, if not all, a scam.

I'm sure they'll have units open next week.

They're just trying to create a false sense of urgency.

Good on ya.

4

imouttahereta t1_japa32k wrote

In what world does the law care about how something "feels" to you? All you'd be doing by filing frivolous complaints is waste a few dollars worth of taxpayer money to make yourself feel better for five minutes. If you want to ban this practice then get involved politically.

1

VeilofIgnorance- t1_jap4iaa wrote

FWIW: PA real estate law requires that landlords/realtors note how long an offer is valid. For similar reasons every real estate company in America adds a disclaimer about prices being subject to change.

So, this is really more a dunning-kruegar situation on your part than a scam. And you should probably apologize to “Traci” for that really rude and foolish reply.

−52