Recent comments in /f/providence

Proof-Variation7005 t1_isb8ns5 wrote

>It's an issue of political will, plain and simple.

Agreed. We could probably stop pretending that Americans want to be Europe. It just seems like such a waste of time to get distracted with shit that simply will not happen anytime remotely soon in the United States.

I prefer looking at solutions and options that have at least a snowball's chance in hell at coming to fruition. Everything beyond that is unproductive white noise.

1

Status_Silver_5114 t1_isak8ar wrote

Reply to comment by Proof-Variation7005 in parking?? by Fluffy-Fruit-1757

Agree! I think this idea that we want our streets to look like suburban NJ with no overnight parking is ridiculous. Our entire street's population (except for us) has turned over completely save 2 properties since then. It makes no sense.

2

Proof-Variation7005 t1_isajfz2 wrote

Reply to comment by Status_Silver_5114 in parking?? by Fluffy-Fruit-1757

I'd wonder if there's a mechanism to to undo/change that. I've spent basically the last decade on an included street, surrounded by included streets but if someone went to their city councilor now and tried to get that changed, do they even have a mechanism for it? Has it happened anywhere?

Really, the city should just unilaterally say "if there's parking during the day, there's permit parking at night" and be done with it. Anyone who wants no parked cars allowed on their street can fuck off and move.

3

Proof-Variation7005 t1_isad5lq wrote

Reply to comment by Trawetser in parking?? by Fluffy-Fruit-1757

They'll definitely boot cars after 5. It's funny the city doesn't just put a registration/license renewal hold for unpaid tickets.

The only people who'd let tickets linger more than a few years would be people who left the state that you'd probably never collect from anyway.

2

AwareFaithlessness68 t1_isa5l0b wrote

The ideas behind this—land trusts that keep affordable housing affordable in perpetuity are important and have been shown to work. The issue is always funding them initially. But if cities support it as a whole then it can be done. You will have powerful interests not in favor, such as the real estate industry, so it is tough. Most people think of housing as a commodity, somewhere to build wealth, which makes it harder to support sustainable/affordable housing. But unless we want to turn into wealthy s***holes with lots of boarded up places too expensive for folks to rent or start businesses then you MUST have a variety of housing for people along all incomes. It’s what makes providence great. I’m the past we have had housing that artists, teachers, new business owners can afford. If you stick to market based models of housing you loose this, and you loose the backbone of your community. No one wants a bunch of 20 y/o working for tech as the only residents of a city.

1