Recent comments in /f/providence

Business-Impress4792 t1_j212rq5 wrote

Reply to Job offer by monraxx

Considering you won’t have to pay for any utilities at the hotel, that might be a good deal. A second job would probably be needed for saving more money though

26

sticksnsnails t1_j20y2rj wrote

Reply to Job offer by monraxx

600 a month is not bad for rent, that’s about what you would get elsewhere in providence.

−4

Wonderful_Bother9172 t1_j20tuex wrote

Reply to comment by JohnProvidence in NYE takeout feast? by salem913

DURKS New Years Eve options are for dine in, can't really get an all you can eat buffet to go. The Beef ribs can be ordered to go though.

And they are kid friendly so you can bring your kid too. But their take out is phenomenal so enjoy dinner at home with the little!

4

bpear t1_j20rpgx wrote

I mean where OP is is a serious hot spot for consistent daily crime. I'd stay out of reach of the high school. The surrounding blocks there are notorious for issues. You don't need to go far for the neighborhood to get a lot better.

Other parts of the West End don't really compare. Petty crime exists anywhere in the city. But there are plenty of spots in the west end that you don't need to live in daily fear that your car windows are smashed.

The neighborhood and whole city really can vary greatly just street by street.

4

whatsaphoto t1_j20qvne wrote

Idk if Los Andes is doing anything for prefix take-home meals for NYE but I'd recommend them any day of the week after their thanksgiving take-home meal. Preordered a few weeks in advance and took home some of the most insanely delicious prime rib (tender enough for the kiddo's pallet as well!) with probably 4 or 5 sides.

Even if they're not doing pre-fix, I'd absolutely get their take out regardless.

7

allhailthehale t1_j20puo3 wrote

I live in the 'nice' part of the west end (on the park) and there's still plenty of property/petty crime to go around. Certainly it makes up for it in lots of other ways, but this person is pretty obviously looking to avoid property crime as their primary objective.

OP, I honestly would not listen to any of the advice in this whole discussion.

0

InfiniteChicken t1_j20p6ns wrote

Get a crazy Khmer platter from Pailin. It’s fantastic, unusual, not very expensive, and really delicious. You won’t know what half of it is, and you won’t care (there’s no mystery meat or anything weird). Just call them and tell them how many people you need to feed.

1

iandavid t1_j20jwim wrote

I don’t know. But sincerely, thanks for sticking with this inane thread and sharing the source of the inaccurate info. I’ve been following this project closely for the last couple years, so the February 2023 date made no sense to me, and this isn’t the first time I’ve seen Channel 10 bungle their facts.

1

iandavid t1_j20h21o wrote

Thank you for providing sources!

I think the issue is that you were misled by WJAR’s shoddy reporting. The Mass Transit magazine piece has more accurate wording:

> Early construction activity will take place intermittently at the station through February 2023.

Meaning the preliminary work was expected to be done in February. But that same article quotes the MBTA GM as saying:

> “We’re excited to see these upcoming station upgrades reach 100 percent design and look forward to acquiring the necessary construction funding to make these critical repairs and important accessibility improvements at South Attleboro so that we can return Commuter Rail service to the station”

1

YesSharks_AreGood t1_j20etpt wrote

Not bad, no worse than the rest of Prov, as long as you’re not directly on the water. I actually find it nice living there when there’s flooding because recently it’s been the highway that has problems, which I can avoid, being on the east side of it!

2

lightningbolt1987 t1_j20dcww wrote

It’s not causing any traffic, that’s one of the reasons it’s time to let it be.

With regards to use, I hear you, but we have an issue currently with proving out these bike lanes, in that they were built in disconnected fragments. Until they connect and you can actually safely and seamlessly bike through the city it’s hard to measure impact because they aren’t that useable. Generally, in other cities, widespread connected bike infrastructure has led to a major increase in biking. There’s no reason to believe Providence (a sense, compact city) would be any different in this regard.

1