Recent comments in /f/providence

Educational_Leg36 t1_j4wv4yk wrote

You need a min 800sqft fenced in area with a chicken coop for a maximum of 6 chickens, absolutely no roosters.

The shitty parts of providence doesn't have Karen's like the good parts, so you won't have animal control called on you, so you can have more and have a smaller keep, living in the shitty parts of providence also let's you have roosters. You could even play music outside for them.

1

RandomChurn OP t1_j4wmpff wrote

Eerie is a good word for it. There are masses of perennial daisies at India Point Park. All of their foliage has a couple inches of new growth on the tips.

Witchhazel is in bloom, a month early. Crocus shoots have been up an inch or more for a couple weeks.

From mid-November until mid-December the cherry trees at the entrance to Swan Point were in bloom. That's supposed to happen in mid-April 😳

I've never seen this.

9

JohnProvidence t1_j4wldv9 wrote

RIOT - a nonprofit org - rents practice space in their basement / offices. I know that RIOT primarily caters to rock bands, but if you just need a space to practice they probably would not care if you practice your bassoon there. You could possibly leave it there (assuming you felt comfortable doing so). I’m not sure how much of a pain it is to transport a bassoon

Here is their site - http://riotri.org They don’t mention space rentals on the site. I would reach out via their contact info.

3

BabyTooph t1_j4w2q4l wrote

Ahhh, even if it’s still sorta stooping to their level, the context of this person being a troll makes sense; i only pop my head in the comment sections from time to time and don’t tend to remember usernames.

1

MrSneaki t1_j4v07ej wrote

The only one pushing anything here is you, my friend, pushing your assumptions and prejudices onto my comments! I'm sorry if you've had your feelings hurt, or had bad experiences in the past, but try to step outside of your evident distaste for ENM folks for just a moment and actually view my comments objectively.

> ...you asked to be included on the email list, "what about ENM?"

I explained that this was intended as a jest, not a serious call to action. Neglecting that clarification is classic bad-faith discourse. In any case, you'd still be off base, even if we were to take that comment literally and disregard my clarification: "what about ENM?" and "ENM should be on this list" are very much not the same.

> I don't need an "offline" conversation as I previously stated I'm quite familiar with what you term the "nuances" of polyamory

Read that request again and you'll see the reason I asked was to spare this comments section the pains of any further dialogue on our part. You also assume too much about my intent in extending a dialogue - I never gave any indication that I was going to proselytize. For the record, I would have opened with questions about your definitions, and wanted to work towards a mutual understanding wherein you would know I wasn't pushing anything. It's clear now that you have little interest in hearing that, though.

> Just because someone won't agree with you that those folks are single doesn't mean there needs to be a further conversation just more evidence of the pushiness of the community.

In any case, you also obviously would have gone into any such dialogue with your own preconceived notions, since I never made any indication that this is how I feel. When did I ever assert that these folks are single? (Hint: it's never) When did I ever insist that there needed to be a further conversation? (Hint: it's never. I extended an offer to continue, I never insisted that we must) When did I ever push anything onto anyone? (Hint: it's never)

> as I previously stated this conversation is over

If you really feel that's the case, then by all means, let the thread die.

0