Recent comments in /f/providence

Proof-Variation7005 t1_jdd3cfu wrote

>This is not an attack at the teamsters as an organization.

You singled them out pretty specifically without any sourcing and, frankly, in defiance of basic logic that says the lobbying arm most likely to push for something like this is the actual distribution companies.

This might have been not your intention, but it's what you did.

3

lestermagnum t1_jdd0ob1 wrote

Wouldn’t not passing this give an unfair advantage to the breweries with enough money the self-distribute? It costs a lot to set that up - you need your own trucks, drivers, insurance, and sales reps. It seems to me that having the same distribution rules for all breweries, both big and tiny, levels the playing field for everyone.

4

beerisgreatPA OP t1_jdd0ni2 wrote

This is not an attack at the teamsters as an organization. That being said, this is a move not to protect jobs this is them trying to keep the status quo. these distro operations are TEENY TINY compared to the three big distributors, who btw are in on this with them, again not to protect jobs.

​

This is about an industry (craft Beer) that is growing faster in Rhode Island than the national average and is hiring people left and right to keep up.

2

FIFAFanboy2023 t1_jdd07vl wrote

So you think they should be able to freely ride around like this? They should be allowed to not just break laws, but fucking laugh at them as they do it? Guarantee you won't be so laissez faire when its your property they destroy or people you know is killed by them. If they were joyriding to get from where they store it to a spot in the woods and wanted to fuck around that way, I'm sure we wouldn't care nearly as much, but these assholes are living with complete disregard for safety, law and societal norms. Hell, I've seen these assholes riding on fucking sidewalks and the bike trails... yknow places where people are leisurely walking, sometimes with headphones on. What do you think would happen to that person when they are hit by a 300 lb dirt bike going 30+?

10

FIFAFanboy2023 t1_jdcz73g wrote

It's not racist at all. The cost benefit analysis is that there would be a higher risk of property damage and loss of life to chase around vehicles that can almost literally go anywhere. The problem is that they don't track them down to their source. As I said before, they aren't keeping these things under their bed. There a couple of them I see in Worcester doing illegal shit that I also see parked plain as day on busy roads.

6

FIFAFanboy2023 t1_jdcyflb wrote

Can't they just use a helicopter to track these assholes? I know it's expensive, but what the fuck, someone is going to get hurt. I'm in Worcester and we have the same problem, just the other day someone whipped around me when traffic was stopped to allow an elderly couple to cross the road and the dickhead missed them by less than a foot; I'm pretty sure they would have died as they were both vey frail looking.

I understand not chasing them around in cars and even to go after one person, but they can easily track a group of them. Or how about offering up a reward to rat them out, obviously these shitheads have a storage spot. I'm sure some neighbor would love to snitch for a cash reward.

5

demon-dance t1_jdcwyh0 wrote

thats just not true. in fact, the majority of my friends live here or are moving here. we all drink coffee and everybody knows dunkin sucks ass. I'll only go to dunkin if I'm taking an early flight and it's the ONLY thing available. Even then, I'm gonna look hard for any alternative caffeine bc dunkin is so nasty.

2

Wonderful_Ad_7235 t1_jdcvrtx wrote

Teamsters are also trying to force wine and beer sales in groceries and convenience stores, threatening existing liquor stores, 99% of which are small, one-location/license (as mandated by law) family-operations, not rich & greedy power players. These Rhode Island-resident-owned brick & mortar businesses need our help too. It would be a shame to see our neighbors have to close up shop while Bezos cashes in even more.

6