Recent comments in /f/rva

Danger-Moose t1_j5ynocg wrote

We used to go to Regency Mall when the kids were younger and the weather was crap. I'm not sure if they've reopened their play area since COVID, but it was a good place where even if they escaped the admittedly lame play area, they certainly wouldn't be bothering anyone by running through an empty mall screaming.

1

GrayRVA t1_j5yme3w wrote

Timely subject. Today’s NYT The Daily podcast is about the American Academy of Pediatrics recommending really aggressive treatment for obese children, including RX weight loss medication and surgery.

0

twelvesteprevenge t1_j5ykm43 wrote

Geeeee, now who made that flag a political football? Step 1: identify a representation of a group you hate, Step 2: be offended by that representation, Step 3: call for that symbol to be banned by a government entity to protect your feelings when it’s really just about sticking your finger in the eye of the “others” you hate.

5

anthropophagoose t1_j5ykl9b wrote

This is the issue- this isn’t sides on an ideological discussion (no matter how bad folks on the right want to present it as such), the symbol is about recognizing people’s right to be treated as people, plain and simple.

Treating a rainbow flag like it’s representing some kind of special interest group, or even a symbols of “wokeness” is a discursive tactic that makes it seem like a political discussion but it’s really not- its very simply a message that a large spectrum (hence the rainbow) of sexual and gender identities that have a history of discrimination against them are accepted unilaterally and equally as human beings. This shouldn’t even be politicized at this point, let alone seen as a “battle” statement.

2

lennybriscoforthewin t1_j5yixze wrote

One thing I learned way too late with my kids- if you take kids to a museum and you really want to see the exhibits but you're sure they'll be bored, get them a headset. For some reason wearing a headset in a museum seems to entertain them enough that they can stay longer than normal.

7

TheStinkySkunk t1_j5yix4c wrote

>the words on this print out sufficiently state all are welcome

If all are welcome why did Hanover seek the ADF's review of policies regarding trans students? Hanover refused to adopt policies that allow a trans student to use the bathroom that aligns with their gender identity. And then they go and seek the opinion of ADF which has goals of "ensuring the law respects God created order for marriage, the family, and human sexuality.”

Are the words enough? No. Not when Hanover is seeking input from a group that doesn't see trans rights as human rights. Not when Hanover's school board has to individually approve which bathroom a trans student can or cannot use.

Edit: I did notice in your original comment you mentioned how you didn't feel the need to be in "battle mode" all the time. I don't know you or your political ideology, but trans people are continually being targeted by Republicans and the alt-right every day.

8