Recent comments in /f/rva

Daemonrealm t1_j7dv8o8 wrote

Reply to comment by bigdaddyman6969 in RPD lies again! by MeanMasheen5

Also I hope it’s known that magistrates are not judges. They almost all have a very close and many times blatantly 1 sided decision making process with regard to anything a police department wants or asks for. There is no decision making or due diligence on their end. They just sign off without reviewing a thing most of the time.

10

xZOMBIETAGx t1_j7duo0u wrote

“ultimately, it was for the jury to decide if Onorati had been assaulted”

even if we can see clearly what happened on camera

71

bigdaddyman6969 t1_j7du3in wrote

Reply to comment by MsKawasaki in RPD lies again! by MeanMasheen5

Dude this is literally directly from the article. The DA dropped the charges because key info in the case was ruled inadmissible. For better or worse.

> McEachin said that her office did not "have any issue with the legitimacy of the charge in this case," and that their decision not to proceed with charges "was unrelated to the implication suggested in your reporting."

> McEachin said that at a hearing the Friday before Holley's trial, the judge had ruled the 911 call for service that brought Yoon and Onorati to Maggie Walker Plaza was inadmissible.

> McEachin said the call for service was for a report of a man attacking people with a glass bottle.

> “The exclusion of the crucial evidence left our prosecutor in a position which she would no longer be able to present at trial the context and reported violence that led the officers to approach Mr. Holley," McEachin said

−2

opienandm t1_j7dtmlq wrote

Reply to comment by bigdaddyman6969 in RPD lies again! by MeanMasheen5

Meanwhile, whatever semblance of a normal life this guy had before a wrongful arrest was probably destroyed. The presumption of guilt is very very strong in this country.

Is the RPD going to reimburse him for lost time at work and attorneys fees?

16

bigdaddyman6969 t1_j7drs7w wrote

Reply to comment by augie_wartooth in RPD lies again! by MeanMasheen5

It’s from the article homie. I realize it goes against “POLICE ALL BAD” narrative Reddit loves. But if you think that cops just decide what charges are brought and that’s the end of the story I don’t know what to tell you.

−48

bigdaddyman6969 t1_j7dp65l wrote

Reply to comment by UnderThenOver in RPD lies again! by MeanMasheen5

I’m not a lawyer- but the DA obviously has to be on board for the case to move forward. So either the DA is just as corrupt as the police officers or something else is also at play.

Reading in between the lines a little bit it looks like the DA chose to drop the case when the reason for the call that brought the police out in the first place(suspect threatening people with a broken glass bottle) was ruled inadmissible.

−50

UnderThenOver t1_j7do5bi wrote

Reply to comment by bigdaddyman6969 in RPD lies again! by MeanMasheen5

Not true. Most charges are taken out by warrant at the Magistrate's office. The officer gives their version of events and the magistrate authorizes the warrant. Prosecutors can alter the charges and can bring direct indictments in circuit court but for charges like this--it's all based on the officer's testimony.

50